FATE: Closed-Loop Feasibility-Aware Task Generation with Active Repair for Physically Grounded Robotic Curricula

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01505v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2026 06:29:42 GMT
• Title: FATE: Closed-Loop Feasibility-Aware Task Generation with Active Repair for Physically Grounded Robotic Curricula
• Abstract summary: We propose FATE, a closed-loop, self-correcting framework that reimagines task generation as an iterative validation-and-refinement process.<n>FATE embeds a generalist embodied agent directly into the generation loop to proactively guarantee the physical groundedness of the resulting curriculum.
• Score: 8.106402582760406
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent breakthroughs in generative simulation have harnessed Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate diverse robotic task curricula, yet these open-loop paradigms frequently produce linguistically coherent but physically infeasible goals, stemming from ungrounded task specifications or misaligned objective formulations. To address this critical limitation, we propose FATE (Feasibility-Aware Task gEneration), a closed-loop, self-correcting framework that reimagines task generation as an iterative validation-and-refinement process. Unlike conventional methods that decouple generation and verification into discrete stages, FATE embeds a generalist embodied agent directly into the generation loop to proactively guarantee the physical groundedness of the resulting curriculum. FATE instantiates a sequential auditing pipeline: it first validates static scene attributes (e.g., object affordances, layout compatibility) and subsequently verifies execution feasibility via simulated embodied interaction. Critical to its performance, upon detecting an infeasible task, FATE deploys an active repair module that autonomously adapts scene configurations or policy specifications, converting unworkable proposals into physically valid task instances. Extensive experiments validate that FATE generates semantically diverse, physically grounded task curricula while achieving a substantial reduction in execution failure rates relative to state-of-the-art generative baselines.

Related papers

• FACET: Preserving Source Intent and Executable State in Terminal Task Synthesis [37.074035615771066]
  FACET (Fine-grained Agentic Construction of Executable Tasks) is a framework that addresses both information preservation and cross-artifact consistency.<n>It reconstructs related agent skills into coherent, information-rich scenarios, then realizes and repairs the execution environment.<n>It produces complex terminal tasks with dense executable checks, and successful trajectories collected from these tasks provide effective, data-efficient supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-19T06:19:20Z)
• Breaking Planner Integrity Boundary: Enviroment State-Text Injection Attack on LLM-Driven Embodied Agents [19.561832878935505]
  We present the first Environment State-Text Injection (ESTI) attack for large language model (LLM)-driven embodied agents.<n>ESTI reformulates an adversarial objective as false state evidence compatible with the current environment.<n>We show that ESTI consistently outperforms existing baselines, improving planning-level and execution-level attack success rates by up to 89.32% and 43.69%, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-17T17:02:07Z)
• PhyAgentOS: A Self-Evolving Operating System for Embodied Agents with Decoupled Cognitive Planning and Physical Execution [49.776611937968]
  We present PhyAgentOS, a foundation delivering scheduling, verification, memory, benchmarking, and safety as system-level services.<n>Its Session-Centered treats a session, not an action, as the minimum unit of scheduling, compatibility, supervised execution, evidence collection, and acceptance.<n>SessionVerifier distinguishes execution termination from semantic task completion via evidence-grounded verdicts of success, failure, or replan.<n> Benchmarking reuses the deployment session and verification path, so results trace to real execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-18T04:46:53Z)
• VASO: Formally Verifiable Self-Evolving Skills for Physical AI Agents [57.240036084348354]
  We introduce VASO, a framework for verification-guided self-evolution of robot skill contracts.<n>VASO verifies logically inconsistent skill contracts, then verifies plans induced by the skill against global and local temporal specifications.<n>On Clearpath Jackal and PX4 quadcopter tasks, VASO reaches 97.2% formal-specification compliance using fewer than 100 optimization samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T20:02:35Z)
• Act, Think or Abstain: Complexity-Aware Adaptive Inference for Vision-Language-Action Models [7.802379200026965]
  We propose an adaptive framework that dynamically routes VLA execution based on the complexity of the perceived state.<n>Our approach transforms the VLA's vision-language backbone into an active detection tool by projecting latent embeddings into an ensemble of parametric and non-parametric estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T13:14:41Z)
• Validating Generalist Robots with Situation Calculus and STL Falsification [6.728104012295723]
  Generalist robots are becoming a reality, capable of interpreting natural language instructions and executing diverse operations.<n>We propose a two-layer validation framework that combines abstract reasoning with concrete system falsification.<n> Experiments on tabletop manipulation tasks show that our framework effectively uncovers failure cases in the NVIDIA GR00T controller.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T14:13:33Z)
• BOTS: A Unified Framework for Bayesian Online Task Selection in LLM Reinforcement Finetuning [82.925106913459]
  Reinforcement finetuning (RFT) is a key technique for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences and enhancing reasoning.<n>We introduce BOTS, a unified framework for Bayesian Online Task Selection in RFT reinforcement finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T11:15:23Z)
• A Unified Framework for Real-Time Failure Handling in Robotics Using Vision-Language Models, Reactive Planner and Behavior Trees [1.3481665321936716]
  This paper presents a unified failure recovery framework that combines Vision-Language Models (VLMs), a reactive planner, and Behavior Trees (BTs) to enable real-time failure handling.<n>Our approach includes pre-execution verification, which checks for potential failures before execution, and reactive failure handling, which detects and corrects failures during execution.<n>We evaluate our framework through real-world experiments with an ABB YuMi robot on tasks like peg insertion, object sorting, and drawer placement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T13:40:56Z)
• Self-Corrective Task Planning by Inverse Prompting with Large Language Models [9.283971287618261]
  We introduce InversePrompt, a novel self-corrective task planning approach.<n>Our method incorporates reasoning steps to provide clear, interpretable feedback.<n>Results on benchmark datasets show an average 16.3% higher success rate over existing LLM-based task planning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T13:35:51Z)
• Model Predictive Task Sampling for Efficient and Robust Adaptation [57.414812940406996]
  We introduce Model Predictive Task Sampling (MPTS), a framework that bridges the task space and adaptation risk distributions.<n>MPTS employs a generative model to characterize the episodic optimization process and predicts task-specific adaptation risk via posterior inference.<n>MPTS seamlessly integrates into zero-shot, few-shot, and supervised finetuning settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-19T13:14:53Z)
• Task-Distributionally Robust Data-Free Meta-Learning [99.56612787882334]
  Data-Free Meta-Learning (DFML) aims to efficiently learn new tasks by leveraging multiple pre-trained models without requiring their original training data. For the first time, we reveal two major challenges hindering their practical deployments: Task-Distribution Shift ( TDS) and Task-Distribution Corruption (TDC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T15:46:54Z)
• Reasoning or Reciting? Exploring the Capabilities and Limitations of Language Models Through Counterfactual Tasks [71.19560970717495]
  Recent language models show impressive performance across a wide range of tasks. Are these skills general and transferable, or specialized to specific tasks seen during pretraining? We propose an evaluation framework based on "counterfactual" task variants that deviate from the default assumptions underlying standard tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-05T17:50:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.