SafeSci: Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models in Science Domains and Beyond

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01589v1
• Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2026 08:16:04 GMT
• Title: SafeSci: Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models in Science Domains and Beyond
• Abstract summary: We introduce SafeSci, a comprehensive framework for safety evaluation and enhancement in scientific contexts.<n>SafeSci comprises SafeSciBench, a multi-disciplinary benchmark with 0.25M samples, and SafeSciTrain, a large-scale dataset containing 1.5M samples for safety enhancement.
• Score: 134.43113804188195
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The success of large language models (LLMs) in scientific domains has heightened safety concerns, prompting numerous benchmarks to evaluate their scientific safety. Existing benchmarks often suffer from limited risk coverage and a reliance on subjective evaluation. To address these problems, we introduce SafeSci, a comprehensive framework for safety evaluation and enhancement in scientific contexts. SafeSci comprises SafeSciBench, a multi-disciplinary benchmark with 0.25M samples, and SafeSciTrain, a large-scale dataset containing 1.5M samples for safety enhancement. SafeSciBench distinguishes between safety knowledge and risk to cover extensive scopes and employs objective metrics such as deterministically answerable questions to mitigate evaluation bias. We evaluate 24 advanced LLMs, revealing critical vulnerabilities in current models. We also observe that LLMs exhibit varying degrees of excessive refusal behaviors on safety-related issues. For safety enhancement, we demonstrate that fine-tuning on SafeSciTrain significantly enhances the safety alignment of models. Finally, we argue that knowledge is a double-edged sword, and determining the safety of a scientific question should depend on specific context, rather than universally categorizing it as safe or unsafe. Our work provides both a diagnostic tool and a practical resource for building safer scientific AI systems.

Related papers

• When Helpers Become Hazards: A Benchmark for Analyzing Multimodal LLM-Powered Safety in Daily Life [36.244977974241245]
  We investigate and evaluate the safety impact of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on human behavior in daily life.<n>We introduce SaLAD, a multimodal safety benchmark which contains 2,013 real-world image-text samples.<n>Results on 18 MLLMs demonstrate that the top-performing models achieve a safe response rate of only 57.2% on unsafe queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T15:59:07Z)
• Safe-SAIL: Towards a Fine-grained Safety Landscape of Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoder Interpretation Framework [31.278770676774325]
  We propose Safe-SAIL, a framework for interpreting SAE features within large language models (LLMs)<n>Our approach systematically identifies SAE with best concept-specific interpretability, explains safety-related neurons, and introduces efficient strategies to scale up the interpretation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T11:22:43Z)
• Think in Safety: Unveiling and Mitigating Safety Alignment Collapse in Multimodal Large Reasoning Model [29.63418384788804]
  We conduct a safety evaluation of 11 Multimodal Large Reasoning Models (MLRMs) across 5 benchmarks.<n>Our analysis reveals distinct safety patterns across different benchmarks.<n>It is a potential approach to address safety issues in MLRMs by leveraging the intrinsic reasoning capabilities of the model to detect unsafe intent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-10T06:59:36Z)
• Safe Vision-Language Models via Unsafe Weights Manipulation [75.04426753720551]
  We revise safety evaluation by introducing Safe-Ground, a new set of metrics that evaluate safety at different levels of granularity.<n>We take a different direction and explore whether it is possible to make a model safer without training, introducing Unsafe Weights Manipulation (UWM)<n>UWM uses a calibration set of safe and unsafe instances to compare activations between safe and unsafe content, identifying the most important parameters for processing the latter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T17:00:22Z)
• Can't See the Forest for the Trees: Benchmarking Multimodal Safety Awareness for Multimodal LLMs [56.440345471966666]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have expanded the capabilities of traditional language models by enabling interaction through both text and images.<n>This paper introduces MMSafeAware, the first comprehensive multimodal safety awareness benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs across 29 safety scenarios.<n> MMSafeAware includes both unsafe and over-safety subsets to assess models abilities to correctly identify unsafe content and avoid over-sensitivity that can hinder helpfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T16:12:40Z)
• SafeBench: A Safety Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Large Language Models [75.67623347512368]
  We propose toolns, a comprehensive framework designed for conducting safety evaluations of MLLMs. Our framework consists of a comprehensive harmful query dataset and an automated evaluation protocol. Based on our framework, we conducted large-scale experiments on 15 widely-used open-source MLLMs and 6 commercial MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:14:40Z)
• Multimodal Situational Safety [73.63981779844916]
  We present the first evaluation and analysis of a novel safety challenge termed Multimodal Situational Safety.<n>For an MLLM to respond safely, whether through language or action, it often needs to assess the safety implications of a language query within its corresponding visual context.<n>We develop the Multimodal Situational Safety benchmark (MSSBench) to assess the situational safety performance of current MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T16:16:07Z)
• The Art of Defending: A Systematic Evaluation and Analysis of LLM Defense Strategies on Safety and Over-Defensiveness [56.174255970895466]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play an increasingly pivotal role in natural language processing applications. This paper presents Safety and Over-Defensiveness Evaluation (SODE) benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T17:37:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.