Safe-SAIL: Towards a Fine-grained Safety Landscape of Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoder Interpretation Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18127v2
• Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 03:58:59 GMT
• Title: Safe-SAIL: Towards a Fine-grained Safety Landscape of Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoder Interpretation Framework
• Authors: Jiaqi Weng, Han Zheng, Hanyu Zhang, Qinqin He, Jialing Tao, Hui Xue, Zhixuan Chu, Xiting Wang,
• Abstract summary: We propose Safe-SAIL, a framework for interpreting SAE features within large language models (LLMs)<n>Our approach systematically identifies SAE with best concept-specific interpretability, explains safety-related neurons, and introduces efficient strategies to scale up the interpretation process.
• Score: 31.278770676774325
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Increasing deployment of large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications raises significant safety concerns. Most existing safety research focuses on evaluating LLM outputs or specific safety tasks, limiting their ability to address broader, undefined risks. Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) facilitate interpretability research to clarify model behavior by explaining single-meaning atomic features decomposed from entangled signals. jHowever, prior applications on SAEs do not interpret features with fine-grained safety-related concepts, thus inadequately addressing safety-critical behaviors, such as generating toxic responses and violating safety regulations. For rigorous safety analysis, we must extract a rich and diverse set of safety-relevant features that effectively capture these high-risk behaviors, yet face two challenges: identifying SAEs with the greatest potential for generating safety concept-specific neurons, and the prohibitively high cost of detailed feature explanation. In this paper, we propose Safe-SAIL, a framework for interpreting SAE features within LLMs to advance mechanistic understanding in safety domains. Our approach systematically identifies SAE with best concept-specific interpretability, explains safety-related neurons, and introduces efficient strategies to scale up the interpretation process. We will release a comprehensive toolkit including SAE checkpoints and human-readable neuron explanations, which supports empirical analysis of safety risks to promote research on LLM safety.

Related papers

• SafeSci: Safety Evaluation of Large Language Models in Science Domains and Beyond [134.43113804188195]
  We introduce SafeSci, a comprehensive framework for safety evaluation and enhancement in scientific contexts.<n>SafeSci comprises SafeSciBench, a multi-disciplinary benchmark with 0.25M samples, and SafeSciTrain, a large-scale dataset containing 1.5M samples for safety enhancement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T08:16:04Z)
• Self-Aware Safety Augmentation: Leveraging Internal Semantic Understanding to Enhance Safety in Vision-Language Models [21.961325147038867]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) are vulnerable to harmful input compared to their language-only backbones.<n>We define these capabilities as safety perception, semantic understanding, and alignment for linguistic expression.<n>Motivated by these findings, we propose textbfSelf-Aware Safety Augmentation (SASA), a technique that projects informative semantic representations onto earlier safety-oriented layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T09:48:57Z)
• Should LLM Safety Be More Than Refusing Harmful Instructions? [6.5137518437747]
  This paper presents a systematic evaluation of Large Language Models' (LLMs) behavior on long-tail distributed (encrypted) texts.<n>We introduce a two-dimensional framework for assessing LLM safety.<n>We demonstrate that models that possess capabilities to decrypt ciphers may be susceptible to mismatched-generalization attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T05:00:12Z)
• SafeKey: Amplifying Aha-Moment Insights for Safety Reasoning [76.56522719330911]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) introduce a new generation paradigm of explicitly reasoning before answering.<n>LRMs pose great safety risks against harmful queries and adversarial attacks.<n>We propose SafeKey to better activate the safety aha moment in the key sentence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T03:46:03Z)
• Reasoning-to-Defend: Safety-Aware Reasoning Can Defend Large Language Models from Jailbreaking [54.10710423370126]
  We propose Reasoning-to-Defend (R2D), a training paradigm that integrates a safety-aware reasoning mechanism into Large Language Models' generation process.<n>CPO enhances the model's perception of the safety status of given dialogues.<n>Experiments demonstrate that R2D effectively mitigates various attacks and improves overall safety, while maintaining the original performances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:48:46Z)
• SafetyAnalyst: Interpretable, Transparent, and Steerable Safety Moderation for AI Behavior [56.10557932893919]
  We present SafetyAnalyst, a novel AI safety moderation framework.<n>Given an AI behavior, SafetyAnalyst uses chain-of-thought reasoning to analyze its potential consequences.<n>It aggregates effects into a harmfulness score using 28 fully interpretable weight parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T03:38:37Z)
• Multimodal Situational Safety [73.63981779844916]
  We present the first evaluation and analysis of a novel safety challenge termed Multimodal Situational Safety.<n>For an MLLM to respond safely, whether through language or action, it often needs to assess the safety implications of a language query within its corresponding visual context.<n>We develop the Multimodal Situational Safety benchmark (MSSBench) to assess the situational safety performance of current MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T16:16:07Z)
• SCANS: Mitigating the Exaggerated Safety for LLMs via Safety-Conscious Activation Steering [56.92068213969036]
  Safety alignment is indispensable for Large Language Models (LLMs) to defend threats from malicious instructions.<n>Recent researches reveal safety-aligned LLMs prone to reject benign queries due to the exaggerated safety issue.<n>We propose a Safety-Conscious Activation Steering (SCANS) method to mitigate the exaggerated safety concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T10:01:34Z)
• The Art of Defending: A Systematic Evaluation and Analysis of LLM Defense Strategies on Safety and Over-Defensiveness [56.174255970895466]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play an increasingly pivotal role in natural language processing applications. This paper presents Safety and Over-Defensiveness Evaluation (SODE) benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T17:37:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.