On the Learnability of Offline Model-Based Optimization: A Ranking Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04000v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 12:45:41 GMT
• Title: On the Learnability of Offline Model-Based Optimization: A Ranking Perspective
• Authors: Shen-Huan Lyu, Rong-Xi Tan, Ke Xue, Yi-Xiao He, Yu Huang, Qingfu Zhang, Chao Qian,
• Abstract summary: offline model-based optimization (MBO) seeks to discover high-performing designs using only a fixed dataset of past evaluations.<n>Most existing methods rely on learning a surrogate model via regression and implicitly assume that good predictive accuracy leads to good optimization performance.<n>We argue that offline optimization is fundamentally a problem of ranking high-quality designs rather than accurate value prediction.
• Score: 28.667834180549686
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Offline model-based optimization (MBO) seeks to discover high-performing designs using only a fixed dataset of past evaluations. Most existing methods rely on learning a surrogate model via regression and implicitly assume that good predictive accuracy leads to good optimization performance. In this work, we challenge this assumption and study offline MBO from a learnability perspective. We argue that offline optimization is fundamentally a problem of ranking high-quality designs rather than accurate value prediction. Specifically, we introduce an optimization-oriented risk based on ranking between near-optimal and suboptimal designs, and develop a unified theoretical framework that connects surrogate learning to final optimization. We prove the theoretical advantages of ranking over regression, and identify distributional mismatch between the training data and near-optimal designs as the dominant error. Inspired by this, we design a distribution-aware ranking method to reduce this mismatch. Empirical results across various tasks show that our approach outperforms twenty existing methods, validating our theoretical findings. Additionally, both theoretical and empirical results reveal intrinsic limitations in offline MBO, showing a regime in which no offline method can avoid over-optimistic extrapolation.

Related papers

• Optimizers Qualitatively Alter Solutions And We Should Leverage This [62.662640460717476]
  Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) can not guarantee convergence to a unique global minimum of the loss when using only local information, such as SGD.<n>We argue that the community should aim at understanding the biases of already existing methods, as well as aim to build new DNNs with the explicit intent of inducing certain properties of the solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T13:33:31Z)
• Divergence Minimization Preference Optimization for Diffusion Model Alignment [66.31417479052774]
  Divergence Minimization Preference Optimization (DMPO) is a principled method for aligning diffusion models by minimizing reverse KL divergence.<n>DMPO can consistently outperform or match existing techniques across different base models and test sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T07:57:30Z)
• Learning Design-Score Manifold to Guide Diffusion Models for Offline Optimization [15.663508678977468]
  This paper introduces ManGO, a diffusion-based framework that learns the design-score manifold.<n>ManGO unifies the design-score interdependencies holistically, attaining generalization beyond training data.<n>It outperforms 24 single- and 10 multi-objective optimization methods across diverse domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T02:11:10Z)
• Preference-Guided Diffusion for Multi-Objective Offline Optimization [64.08326521234228]
  We propose a preference-guided diffusion model for offline multi-objective optimization.<n>Our guidance is a preference model trained to predict the probability that one design dominates another.<n>Our results highlight the effectiveness of classifier-guided diffusion models in generating diverse and high-quality solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T16:49:38Z)
• Incorporating Surrogate Gradient Norm to Improve Offline Optimization Techniques [8.750390242872138]
  We develop a model-agnostic approach to offline optimization.<n>We show that reducing surrogate sharpness on the offline dataset provably reduces its generalized sharpness on unseen data.<n>Our analysis extends existing theories from bounding generalized prediction loss (on unseen data) with loss sharpness to bounding the worst-case generalized surrogate sharpness with its empirical estimate on training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T09:24:23Z)
• Learning Surrogates for Offline Black-Box Optimization via Gradient Matching [29.831762991506242]
  We present a theoretical framework to understand offline black-box optimization, by explicitly bounding the optimization quality based on how well the surrogate matches the latent gradient field that underlines the offline data.<n>Inspired by our principled analysis, we propose a black-box gradient matching algorithm to create effective surrogate models for offline optimization, improving over prior approaches on various real-world benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T22:35:54Z)
• Offline Model-Based Optimization by Learning to Rank [26.21886715050762]
  We argue that regression models trained with mean squared error (MSE) are not well-aligned with the primary goal of offline model-based optimization.<n>We propose learning a ranking-based model that leverages learning to rank techniques to prioritize promising designs based on their relative scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T11:15:03Z)
• Functional Graphical Models: Structure Enables Offline Data-Driven Optimization [111.28605744661638]
  We show how structure can enable sample-efficient data-driven optimization. We also present a data-driven optimization algorithm that infers the FGM structure itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-08T22:33:14Z)
• From Function to Distribution Modeling: A PAC-Generative Approach to Offline Optimization [30.689032197123755]
  This paper considers the problem of offline optimization, where the objective function is unknown except for a collection of offline" data examples. Instead of learning and then optimizing the unknown objective function, we take on a less intuitive but more direct view that optimization can be thought of as a process of sampling from a generative model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T01:32:50Z)
• COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization [120.55713363569845]
  Uncertainty estimation with complex models, such as deep neural networks, can be difficult and unreliable. We develop a new model-based offline RL algorithm, COMBO, that regularizes the value function on out-of-support state-actions. We find that COMBO consistently performs as well or better as compared to prior offline model-free and model-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-16T18:50:32Z)
• Fast Rates for Contextual Linear Optimization [52.39202699484225]
  We show that a naive plug-in approach achieves regret convergence rates that are significantly faster than methods that directly optimize downstream decision performance. Our results are overall positive for practice: predictive models are easy and fast to train using existing tools, simple to interpret, and, as we show, lead to decisions that perform very well.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-05T18:43:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.