Turning Trust to Transactions: Tracking Affiliate Marketing and FTC Compliance in YouTube's Influencer Economy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04383v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 18:47:12 GMT
• Title: Turning Trust to Transactions: Tracking Affiliate Marketing and FTC Compliance in YouTube's Influencer Economy
• Abstract summary: We analyze the prevalence of affiliate marketing on YouTube and the rates of non-compliant behavior.<n>Our findings reveal that affiliate links are widespread, yet dis- closure compliance remains low.<n>We recommend that regulators and affiliate partners collaborate with platforms to enhance transparency, accountability, and trust in the influencer economy.
• Score: 14.711670297954457
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: YouTube has evolved into a powerful platform that where creators monetize their influence through affiliate marketing, raising concerns about transparency and ethics, especially when creators fail to disclose their affiliate relationships. Although regulatory agencies like the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have issued guidelines to address these issues, non-compliance and consumer harm persist, and the extent of these problems remains unclear. In this paper, we introduce tools, developed with insights from recent advances in Web measurement and NLP research, to examine the state of the affiliate marketing ecosystem on YouTube. We apply these tools to a 10-year dataset of 2 million videos from nearly 540,000 creators, analyzing the prevalence of affiliate marketing on YouTube and the rates of non-compliant behavior. Our findings reveal that affiliate links are widespread, yet dis- closure compliance remains low, with most videos failing to meet FTC standards. Furthermore, we analyze the effects of different stakeholders in improving disclosure behavior. Our study suggests that the platform is highly associated with improved compliance through standardized disclosure features. We recommend that regulators and affiliate partners collaborate with platforms to enhance transparency, accountability, and trust in the influencer economy.

Related papers

• Learning from Online User Feedback for Shopping Agents [54.03311028861336]
  Large language model-based shopping agents are increasingly deployed in real-world e-commerce platforms.<n>Existing approaches rely on offline training signals, such as user-item interactions or synthetic preference data.<n>We propose LOFA, a framework that enables shopping agents to learn directly from real online interaction logs without human annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-12T03:24:44Z)
• Finfluencers on TikTok: A Longitudinal Analysis of Content, Engagement, and Disclaimer Practices [0.0]
  We analyze UK finfluencer content, engagement dynamics, disclaimer practices, audience sentiment, and network structure.<n>Using topic modeling, we identify four dominant themes: Entrepreneurship & Side Hustles, Property Investing, Active Trading, and Saving & Budgeting.<n>We discuss implications for consumer protection and the design of clearer and more standardized financial risk disclosures on social media platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-06T15:17:18Z)
• Fairness Dynamics in Digital Economy Platforms with Biased Ratings [50.29721091981893]
  We study how digital platforms can perpetuate or counteract rating-based discrimination.<n>Our results demonstrate a fundamental trade-off between user experience and fairness.<n>Our results also provide evidence that intervening by tuning the demographics of the search results is a highly effective way of reducing unfairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T18:41:16Z)
• Why Authors and Maintainers Link (or Don't Link) Their PyPI Libraries to Code Repositories and Donation Platforms [83.16077040470975]
  Metadata of libraries on the Python Package Index (PyPI) plays a critical role in supporting the transparency, trust, and sustainability of open-source libraries.<n>This paper presents a large-scale empirical study combining two targeted surveys sent to 50,000 PyPI authors and maintainers.<n>We analyze more than 1,400 responses using large language model (LLM)-based topic modeling to uncover key motivations and barriers related to linking repositories and donation platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T16:13:57Z)
• UK Finfluencers: Exploring Content, Reach, and Responsibility [0.0]
  This study investigates the patterns and behaviours of finfluencers in the UK on TikTok.<n>The aim is to identify common engagement patterns and propose guidelines that can help protect the public from potential financial harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-03T22:28:36Z)
• The Monetisation of Toxicity: Analysing YouTube Content Creators and Controversy-Driven Engagement [1.3108652488669736]
  This paper presents a quantitative analysis of controversial content on YouTube, focusing on the relationship between controversy, toxicity, and monetisation. We introduce a curated dataset comprising 20 controversial YouTube channels extracted from Reddit discussions, including 16,349 videos and more than 105 million comments. We identify and categorise monetisation cues from video descriptions into various models, including affiliate marketing and direct selling. Our findings reveal that while toxic comments correlate with higher engagement, they negatively impact monetisation, indicating that controversy-driven interaction does not necessarily lead to financial gain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T13:10:35Z)
• Across Platforms and Languages: Dutch Influencers and Legal Disclosures on Instagram, YouTube and TikTok [6.070078201123852]
  This paper proposes a transparent methodology for measuring whether and how influencers comply with disclosures based on legal standards. We apply this methodology to an original dataset reflecting the content of 150 Dutch influencers publicly registered with the Dutch Media Authority. We find that influencer marketing remains generally underdisclosed on social media, and that bigger influencers are not necessarily more compliant with disclosure standards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T09:59:52Z)
• The Conspiracy Money Machine: Uncovering Telegram's Conspiracy Channels and their Profit Model [45.36255876305057]
  We discover that conspiracy channels can be clustered into four distinct communities comprising over 17,000 channels.<n>We find conspiracy theorists leverage e-commerce platforms to sell questionable products or lucratively promote them through affiliate links.<n>We uncover the "Conspiracy Money Machine," revealing how most conspiracy channels actively seek to profit from their subscribers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T16:25:52Z)
• A Multimodal Analysis of Influencer Content on Twitter [40.41635575764701]
  Line between personal opinions and commercial content promotion is frequently blurred. This makes automatic detection of regulatory compliance breaches related to influencer advertising difficult. We introduce a new Twitter (now X) dataset consisting of 15,998 influencer posts mapped into commercial and non-commercial categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T15:07:23Z)
• Welcome to the Dark Side: Analyzing the Revenue Flows of Fraud in the Online Ad Ecosystem [2.1456348289599134]
  Bad actors have found ways to circumvent restrictions, and generate substantial revenue that can support websites with objectionable or even illegal content.<n>We show how shady actors take advantage of gaps to absorb ad revenues while putting the brand safety of advertisers in danger.<n>We publish a Web monitoring service that enhances the transparency of supply chains and business relationships between publishers and ad networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T10:28:07Z)
• Protecting User Privacy in Online Settings via Supervised Learning [69.38374877559423]
  We design an intelligent approach to online privacy protection that leverages supervised learning. By detecting and blocking data collection that might infringe on a user's privacy, we can restore a degree of digital privacy to the user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T05:20:16Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
  We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news. In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities. We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z)
• Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics [43.98568073610101]
  We use a social media model to quantify the impacts of several adversarial manipulation tactics on the quality of content. We find that the presence of influential accounts, a hallmark of social media, exacerbates the vulnerabilities of online communities to manipulation. These insights suggest countermeasures that platforms could employ to increase the resilience of social media users to manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-13T21:12:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.