Scaling Laws for Reranking in Information Retrieval

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04816v1
• Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2026 05:03:07 GMT
• Title: Scaling Laws for Reranking in Information Retrieval
• Authors: Rahul Seetharaman, Aman Bansal, Hamed Zamani, Kaustubh Dhole,
• Abstract summary: We present the first systematic study of scaling laws for rerankers.<n>Using a detailed case study with cross-encoder rerankers, we demonstrate that performance follows a predictable power law.<n>Our results establish scaling principles for reranking and provide actionable insights for building industrial-grade retrieval systems.
• Score: 24.00475965133032
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Scaling laws have been observed across a wide range of tasks, such as natural language generation and dense retrieval, where performance follows predictable patterns as model size, data, and compute grow. However, these scaling laws are insufficient for understanding the scaling behavior of multi-stage retrieval systems, which typically include a reranking stage. In large-scale multi-stage retrieval systems, reranking is the final and most influential step before presenting a ranked list of items to the end user. In this work, we present the first systematic study of scaling laws for rerankers by analyzing performance across model sizes and data budgets for three popular paradigms: pointwise, pairwise, and listwise reranking. Using a detailed case study with cross-encoder rerankers, we demonstrate that performance follows a predictable power law. This regularity allows us to accurately forecast the performance of larger models for some metrics more than others using smaller-scale experiments, offering a robust methodology for saving significant computational resources. For example, we accurately estimate the NDCG of a 1B-parameter model by training and evaluating only smaller models (up to 400M parameters), in both in-domain as well as out-of-domain settings. Our experiments encompass span several loss functions, models and metrics and demonstrate that downstream metrics like NDCG, MAP (Mean Avg Precision) show reliable scaling behavior and can be forecasted accurately at scale, while highlighting the limitations of metrics like Contrastive Entropy and MRR (Mean Reciprocal Rank) which do not follow predictable scaling behavior in all instances. Our results establish scaling principles for reranking and provide actionable insights for building industrial-grade retrieval systems.

Related papers

• Revisiting the Scaling Properties of Downstream Metrics in Large Language Model Training [11.179110411255708]
  We propose a direct framework to model the scaling of benchmark performance from the training budget.<n>Our results show that the direct approach extrapolates better than the previously proposed two-stage procedure.<n>We release the complete set of pretraining losses and downstream evaluation results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T18:33:48Z)
• Scaling Laws for Robust Comparison of Open Foundation Language-Vision Models and Datasets [5.8465717270452195]
  We show how scaling law derivation can be used for model and dataset comparison.<n>For the first time, full scaling laws are derived for two important language-vision learning procedures, CLIP and MaMMUT.<n>We show that comparison can also be performed when deriving scaling laws with a constant learning rate schedule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T03:35:59Z)
• Bayesian Neural Scaling Law Extrapolation with Prior-Data Fitted Networks [100.13335639780415]
  Scaling laws often follow the power-law and proposed several variants of power-law functions to predict the scaling behavior at larger scales.<n>Existing methods mostly rely on point estimation and do not quantify uncertainty, which is crucial for real-world applications.<n>In this work, we explore a Bayesian framework based on Prior-data Fitted Networks (PFNs) for neural scaling law extrapolation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T03:19:17Z)
• Exploring Training and Inference Scaling Laws in Generative Retrieval [50.82554729023865]
  Generative retrieval reformulates retrieval as an autoregressive generation task, where large language models generate target documents directly from a query.<n>We systematically investigate training and inference scaling laws in generative retrieval, exploring how model size, training data scale, and inference-time compute jointly influence performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T17:59:03Z)
• Optimizing Sequential Recommendation Models with Scaling Laws and Approximate Entropy [104.48511402784763]
  Performance Law for SR models aims to theoretically investigate and model the relationship between model performance and data quality.<n>We propose Approximate Entropy (ApEn) to assess data quality, presenting a more nuanced approach compared to traditional data quantity metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-30T10:56:30Z)
• A Hitchhiker's Guide to Scaling Law Estimation [56.06982415792523]
  Scaling laws predict the loss of a target machine learning model by extrapolating from easier-to-train models with fewer parameters or smaller training sets.<n>We estimate more than 1000 scaling laws, then derive a set of best practices for estimating scaling laws in new model families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T17:59:10Z)
• Scaling Laws For Dense Retrieval [22.76001461620846]
  We investigate whether the performance of dense retrieval models follows the scaling law as other neural models. Results indicate that, under our settings, the performance of dense retrieval models follows a precise power-law scaling related to the model size and the number of annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T15:27:36Z)
• Predicting Emergent Abilities with Infinite Resolution Evaluation [85.89911520190711]
  We introduce PassUntil, an evaluation strategy with theoretically infinite resolution, through massive sampling in the decoding phase. We predict the performance of the 2.4B model on code generation with merely 0.05% deviation before training starts. We identify a kind of accelerated emergence whose scaling curve cannot be fitted by standard scaling law function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T02:35:00Z)
• A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Laws [72.8349503901712]
  Large language models with a huge number of parameters, when trained on near internet-sized number of tokens, have been empirically shown to obey neural scaling laws. We propose a statistical model -- a joint generative data model and random feature model -- that captures this neural scaling phenomenology. Key findings are the manner in which the power laws that occur in the statistics of natural datasets are extended by nonlinear random feature maps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-30T15:13:18Z)
• Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruning [37.804100045519846]
  We show how in theory we can break beyond power law scaling and potentially even reduce it to exponential scaling. We develop a new simple, cheap and scalable self-supervised pruning metric that demonstrates comparable performance to the best supervised metrics. Overall, our work suggests that the discovery of good data-pruning metrics may provide a viable path forward to substantially improved neural scaling laws.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-29T09:20:47Z)
• Scaling Laws Under the Microscope: Predicting Transformer Performance from Small Scale Experiments [42.793379799720434]
  We investigate whether scaling laws can be used to accelerate model development. We find that scaling laws emerge at finetuning time in some NLP tasks. For tasks where scaling laws exist, they can be used to predict the performance of larger models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-13T19:13:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.