Distributed Partial Information Puzzles: Examining Common Ground Construction Under Epistemic Asymmetry

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05450v1
• Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2026 18:22:55 GMT
• Title: Distributed Partial Information Puzzles: Examining Common Ground Construction Under Epistemic Asymmetry
• Authors: Yifan Zhu, Mariah Bradford, Kenneth Lai, Timothy Obiso, Videep Venkatesha, James Pustejovsky, Nikhil Krishnaswamy,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the Distributed Partial Information Puzzle (DPIP), a collaborative construction task that elicits rich multimodal communication under epistemic asymmetry.<n>We present a multimodal dataset of these interactions, annotated and temporally aligned across speech, gesture, and action modalities to support reasoning over propositional content and belief dynamics.<n>We then evaluate two paradigms for modeling common ground (CG): (1) state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs), prompted to infer shared beliefs from multimodal updates, and (2) an axiomatic pipeline grounded in Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) that incrementally performs the same task.
• Score: 12.909843280558986
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Establishing common ground, a shared set of beliefs and mutually recognized facts, is fundamental to collaboration, yet remains a challenge for current AI systems, especially in multimodal, multiparty settings, where the collaborators bring different information to the table. We introduce the Distributed Partial Information Puzzle (DPIP), a collaborative construction task that elicits rich multimodal communication under epistemic asymmetry. We present a multimodal dataset of these interactions, annotated and temporally aligned across speech, gesture, and action modalities to support reasoning over propositional content and belief dynamics. We then evaluate two paradigms for modeling common ground (CG): (1) state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs), prompted to infer shared beliefs from multimodal updates, and (2) an axiomatic pipeline grounded in Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) that incrementally performs the same task. Results on the annotated DPIP data indicate that it poses a challenge to modern LLMs' abilities to track both task progression and belief state.

Related papers

• MMhops-R1: Multimodal Multi-hop Reasoning [89.68086555694084]
  We introduce MMhops, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate and foster multi-modal multi-hop reasoning.<n> MMhops dataset comprises two challenging task formats, Bridging and Comparison.<n>We propose MMhops-R1, a novel multi-modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework for dynamic reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T17:29:02Z)
• Graph4MM: Weaving Multimodal Learning with Structural Information [52.16646463590474]
  Graphs provide powerful structural information for modeling intra- and inter-modal relationships.<n>Previous works fail to distinguish multi-hop neighbors and treat the graph as a standalone modality.<n>We propose Graph4MM, a graph-based multimodal learning framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-19T20:13:03Z)
• Uni-MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Unified Benchmark [69.8473923357969]
  Unified multimodal models aim to jointly enable visual understanding and generation, yet current benchmarks rarely examine their true integration.<n>We present Uni-MMMU, a comprehensive benchmark that unfolds the bidirectional synergy between generation and understanding across eight reasoning-centric domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T17:10:35Z)
• Beyond Spurious Signals: Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models via Counterfactual Inference and Adaptive Expert Routing [10.66971486730557]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown substantial capabilities in integrating visual and textual information, yet frequently rely on spurious correlations.<n>This paper addresses the critical challenge of superficial correlation bias in MLLMs through a novel causal mediation-based debiasing framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T19:01:11Z)
• UniHR: Hierarchical Representation Learning for Unified Knowledge Graph Link Prediction [59.84402324458322]
  Real-world knowledge graphs (KGs) contain not only standard triple-based facts, but also more complex, heterogeneous types of facts.<n>We propose UniHR, a learning framework that unifies hyper-relational KGs, temporal KGs, and nested factual KGs into triple-based representations.<n>Experiments on 9 datasets across 5 types of KGs demonstrate the effectiveness of UniHR and highlight the strong potential of unified representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T14:22:42Z)
• Common Ground Tracking in Multimodal Dialogue [13.763043173931024]
  We present a method for automatically identifying the current set of shared beliefs and questions under discussion'' (QUDs) of a group with a shared goal. We annotate a dataset of multimodal interactions in a shared physical space with speech transcriptions, prosodic features, gestures, actions, and facets of collaboration. We cascade into a set of formal closure rules derived from situated evidence and belief axioms and update operations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T00:25:01Z)
• Unified Multi-modal Unsupervised Representation Learning for Skeleton-based Action Understanding [62.70450216120704]
  Unsupervised pre-training has shown great success in skeleton-based action understanding. We propose a Unified Multimodal Unsupervised Representation Learning framework, called UmURL. UmURL exploits an efficient early-fusion strategy to jointly encode the multi-modal features in a single-stream manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T13:56:57Z)
• Quantifying & Modeling Multimodal Interactions: An Information Decomposition Framework [89.8609061423685]
  We propose an information-theoretic approach to quantify the degree of redundancy, uniqueness, and synergy relating input modalities with an output task. To validate PID estimation, we conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic datasets where the PID is known and on large-scale multimodal benchmarks. We demonstrate their usefulness in (1) quantifying interactions within multimodal datasets, (2) quantifying interactions captured by multimodal models, (3) principled approaches for model selection, and (4) three real-world case studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T18:59:05Z)
• High-Modality Multimodal Transformer: Quantifying Modality & Interaction Heterogeneity for High-Modality Representation Learning [112.51498431119616]
  This paper studies efficient representation learning for high-modality scenarios involving a large set of diverse modalities. A single model, HighMMT, scales up to 10 modalities (text, image, audio, video, sensors, proprioception, speech, time-series, sets, and tables) and 15 tasks from 5 research areas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T18:56:20Z)
• Multimodal Representations Learning Based on Mutual Information Maximization and Minimization and Identity Embedding for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis [33.73730195500633]
  We propose a multimodal representation model based on Mutual information Maximization and Identity Embedding. Experimental results on two public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T01:41:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.