RILEC: Detection and Generation of L1 Russian Interference Errors in English Learner Texts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.07366v1
• Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2026 22:33:22 GMT
• Title: RILEC: Detection and Generation of L1 Russian Interference Errors in English Learner Texts
• Abstract summary: L1 interference refers to errors influenced by a speaker's first language, such as using stadion instead of stadium.<n>We introduce RILEC, a large-scale dataset of over 18,000 sentences, combining expert-annotated data from REALEC with synthetic examples generated through rule-based and neural augmentation.<n>We propose a framework for generating L1-motivated errors using generative language models optimized with PPO, prompt-based control, and rule-based patterns.
• Score: 1.4837169131671546
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Many errors in student essays can be explained by influence from the native language (L1). L1 interference refers to errors influenced by a speaker's first language, such as using stadion instead of stadium, reflecting lexical transliteration from Russian. In this work, we address the task of detecting such errors in English essays written by Russian-speaking learners. We introduce RILEC, a large-scale dataset of over 18,000 sentences, combining expert-annotated data from REALEC with synthetic examples generated through rule-based and neural augmentation. We propose a framework for generating L1-motivated errors using generative language models optimized with PPO, prompt-based control, and rule-based patterns. Models fine-tuned on RILEC achieve strong performance, particularly on word-level interference types such as transliteration and tense semantics. We find that the proposed augmentation pipeline leads to a significant performance improvement, making it a potentially valuable tool for learners and teachers to more effectively identify and address such errors.

Related papers

• Reasoning over Grammar: Can Synthetic Linguistic Reasoning Traces Enhance Low-Resource Machine Translation? [49.7935995447581]
  We investigate whether low-resource machine translation can benefit from structured intermediate steps of linguistic analysis and grammatical reasoning.<n>We propose a pipeline for automatically generating step-by-step linguistic reasoning traces from Universal Dependencies treebanks, dictionaries, and grammar-rule banks.<n>Our results show that linguistic reasoning traces are most effective as inference-time guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-02T15:36:12Z)
• The Impact of Editorial Intervention on Detecting Native Language Traces [1.6210510806456278]
  Native Language Identification (NLI) is the task of determining an author's native language (L1) from their non-native writings.<n>With the advent of human-AI co-authorship, non-native texts are routinely corrected and rewritten by large language models.<n>We investigate the robustness of L1 traces across increasing degrees of editorial intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T08:58:08Z)
• Parallel Universes, Parallel Languages: A Comprehensive Study on LLM-based Multilingual Counterfactual Example Generation [49.2073409243885]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel at generating English counterfactuals and demonstrate multilingual proficiency.<n>We conduct automatic evaluations on both directly generated counterfactuals in the target languages and those derived via English translation across six languages.<n>We identify and categorize four main types of errors that consistently appear in the generated counterfactuals across languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-01T08:53:49Z)
• FEANEL: A Benchmark for Fine-Grained Error Analysis in K-12 English Writing [68.23874413455594]
  We present the Fine-grained Error ANalysis for English learners (FEANEL) Benchmark.<n>The benchmark comprises 1,000 essays written by elementary and secondary school students.<n>Each error is annotated by language education experts and categorized by type, severity, and explanatory feedback, using a part-of-speech-based taxonomy they co-developed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T05:17:45Z)
• Mitigating the Language Mismatch and Repetition Issues in LLM-based Machine Translation via Model Editing [39.375342978538654]
  We focus on utilizing Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform machine translation. We observe that two patterns of errors frequently occur and drastically affect the translation quality: language mismatch and repetition. We explore the potential for mitigating these two issues by leveraging model editing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T16:51:21Z)
• Generative error correction for code-switching speech recognition using large language models [49.06203730433107]
  Code-switching (CS) speech refers to the phenomenon of mixing two or more languages within the same sentence. We propose to leverage large language models (LLMs) and lists of hypotheses generated by an ASR to address the CS problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T14:49:48Z)
• BiPhone: Modeling Inter Language Phonetic Influences in Text [12.405907573933378]
  A large number of people are forced to use the Web in a language they have low literacy in due to technology asymmetries. Written text in the second language (L2) from such users often contains a large number of errors that are influenced by their native language (L1) We propose a method to mine phoneme confusions (sounds in L2 that an L1 speaker is likely to conflate) for pairs of L1 and L2. These confusions are then plugged into a generative model (Bi-Phone) for synthetically producing corrupted L2 text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T22:31:55Z)
• Learning from Mistakes via Cooperative Study Assistant for Large Language Models [17.318591492264023]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated their potential to refine their generation based on their own feedback. We propose Study Assistant for Large LAnguage Model (SALAM), a novel framework with an auxiliary agent to assist the main LLM in learning from mistakes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T08:51:08Z)
• Shapley Head Pruning: Identifying and Removing Interference in Multilingual Transformers [54.4919139401528]
  We show that it is possible to reduce interference by identifying and pruning language-specific parameters. We show that removing identified attention heads from a fixed model improves performance for a target language on both sentence classification and structural prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T18:11:37Z)
• Towards Language Modelling in the Speech Domain Using Sub-word Linguistic Units [56.52704348773307]
  We propose a novel LSTM-based generative speech LM based on linguistic units including syllables and phonemes. With a limited dataset, orders of magnitude smaller than that required by contemporary generative models, our model closely approximates babbling speech. We show the effect of training with auxiliary text LMs, multitask learning objectives, and auxiliary articulatory features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-31T22:48:30Z)
• Pre-training for Spoken Language Understanding with Joint Textual and Phonetic Representation Learning [4.327558819000435]
  We propose a novel joint textual-phonetic pre-training approach for learning spoken language representations. Experimental results on spoken language understanding benchmarks, Fluent Speech Commands and SNIPS, show that the proposed approach significantly outperforms strong baseline models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-21T05:19:13Z)
• Joint Contextual Modeling for ASR Correction and Language Understanding [60.230013453699975]
  We propose multi-task neural approaches to perform contextual language correction on ASR outputs jointly with language understanding (LU) We show that the error rates of off the shelf ASR and following LU systems can be reduced significantly by 14% relative with joint models trained using small amounts of in-domain data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-28T22:09:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.