Diagnosing and Repairing Citation Failures in Generative Engine Optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09296v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 07:25:34 GMT
• Title: Diagnosing and Repairing Citation Failures in Generative Engine Optimization
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a diagnostic approach to GEO that asks why a document fails to be cited and intervenes accordingly.<n>We develop a unified framework comprising: (1) the first taxonomy of citation failure modes spanning different stages of a citation pipeline; (2) AgentGEO, an agentic system that diagnoses failures using this taxonomy; and (3) a document-centric benchmark evaluating whether optimizations generalize across held-out queries.
• Score: 21.43145230591834
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) aims to improve content visibility in AI-generated responses. However, existing methods measure contribution-how much a document influences a response-rather than citation, the mechanism that actually drives traffic back to creators. Also, these methods apply generic rewriting rules uniformly, failing to diagnose why individual document are not cited. This paper introduces a diagnostic approach to GEO that asks why a document fails to be cited and intervenes accordingly. We develop a unified framework comprising: (1) the first taxonomy of citation failure modes spanning different stages of a citation pipeline; (2) AgentGEO, an agentic system that diagnoses failures using this taxonomy, selects targeted repairs from a corresponding tool library, and iterates until citation is achieved; and (3) a document-centric benchmark evaluating whether optimizations generalize across held-out queries. AgentGEO achieves over 40% relative improvement in citation rates while modifying only 5% of content, compared to 25% for baselines. Our analysis reveals that generic optimization can harm long-tail content and some documents face challenges that optimization alone cannot fully address-findings with implications for equitable visibility in AI-mediated information access.

Related papers

• Fantastic Adaptive Taxonomies and How to Use Them [100.20614173157708]
  AdaMAST converts execution traces into a compact, evidence-grounded failure taxonomy.<n>No code is hand-authored, no trace human-annotated.<n>In agent-system search, taxonomy-coded diagnoses of failed candidates outperform free-form.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-17T17:41:16Z)
• Optimizing Visibility in Generative Engines: A Critical Survey of Generative Engine Optimization (2023-2026) [0.0]
  Generative Engine Optimization seeks to increase content's presence, likelihood of citation, or influence in answers produced by generative engines.<n>This critical survey reviews 45 studies selected under a November 2023-July 2026 publication window.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T17:03:08Z)
• TechGraphRAG: An Agentic Graph-Augmented RAG Framework for Technical Literature Reasoning [0.0]
  This paper presents an agentic retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework for domain-specific technical reasoning support.<n>The proposed architecture employs a 13-step autonomous pipeline that classifies queries by intent, scores evidence sufficiency against a multi-dimensional rubric, and searches external academic databases.<n>The framework is presented as a practical, implemented case study illustrating how agentic, evidence-grounded RAG can support literature navigation and technical reasoning over large, domain-specific corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T03:01:51Z)
• Adaptive Chunking: Optimizing Chunking-Method Selection for RAG [0.0]
  We introduce Adaptive Chunking, a framework that selects the most suitable chunking strategy for each document.<n>On a diverse corpus spanning legal, technical, and social science domains, our metric-merge adaptive method significantly improves downstream RAG performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-26T11:20:52Z)
• BibAgent: An Agentic Framework for Traceable Miscitation Detection in Scientific Literature [21.872874595027824]
  BibAgent is a scalable, end-to-end agentic framework for automated citation verification.<n>It integrates retrieval, reasoning, and adaptive evidence aggregation, applying strategies for accessible and paywalled sources.<n>Our results demonstrate that BibAgent outperforms state-of-the-art Large Language Model (LLM) baselines in citation verification accuracy and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T16:30:45Z)
• SemanticCite: Citation Verification with AI-Powered Full-Text Analysis and Evidence-Based Reasoning [0.0]
  We introduce SemanticCite, an AI-powered system that verifies citation accuracy through full-text source analysis.<n>Our approach combines multiple retrieval methods with a four-class classification system that captures nuanced claim-source relationships.<n>We contribute a comprehensive dataset of over 1,000 citations with detailed alignments, functional classifications, semantic annotations, and bibliometric metadata.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T10:05:21Z)
• VeriCite: Towards Reliable Citations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Rigorous Verification [107.75781898355562]
  We introduce a novel framework, called VeriCite, designed to rigorously validate supporting evidence and enhance answer attribution.<n>We conduct experiments across five open-source LLMs and four datasets, demonstrating that VeriCite can significantly improve citation quality while maintaining the correctness of the answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T13:38:54Z)
• Relevance to Utility: Process-Supervised Rewrite for RAG [38.81331265140413]
  We show how "bridge" modules fail to capture true document utility.<n>We propose R2U, with a key distinction of directly optimizing to maximize the probability of generating a correct answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T04:24:57Z)
• Document Attribution: Examining Citation Relationships using Large Language Models [62.46146670035751]
  We propose a zero-shot approach that frames attribution as a straightforward textual entailment task.<n>We also explore the role of the attention mechanism in enhancing the attribution process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T04:40:11Z)
• TrustRAG: An Information Assistant with Retrieval Augmented Generation [73.84864898280719]
  TrustRAG is a novel framework that enhances acRAG from three perspectives: indexing, retrieval, and generation.<n>We open-source the TrustRAG framework and provide a demonstration studio designed for excerpt-based question answering tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T13:45:27Z)
• On the Capacity of Citation Generation by Large Language Models [38.47160164251295]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) appears as a promising method to alleviate the "hallucination" problem in large language models (LLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T03:04:26Z)
• Ground Every Sentence: Improving Retrieval-Augmented LLMs with Interleaved Reference-Claim Generation [51.8188846284153]
  Attributed Text Generation (ATG) is proposed to enhance credibility and verifiability in RAG systems.<n>This paper proposes ReClaim, a fine-grained ATG method that alternates the generation of references and answers step by step.<n>With extensive experiments, we verify the effectiveness of ReClaim in extensive settings, achieving a citation accuracy rate of 90%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T20:47:47Z)
• GERE: Generative Evidence Retrieval for Fact Verification [57.78768817972026]
  We propose GERE, the first system that retrieves evidences in a generative fashion. The experimental results on the FEVER dataset show that GERE achieves significant improvements over the state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-12T03:49:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.