Prompting with the human-touch: evaluating model-sensitivity of foundation models for musculoskeletal CT segmentation
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10541v1
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:45:54 GMT
- Title: Prompting with the human-touch: evaluating model-sensitivity of foundation models for musculoskeletal CT segmentation
- Abstract summary: The selection of the most optimal FM for a human-driven setting remains challenging.<n>Even high-performing FMs are sensitive to variations in human input prompts.
- Score: 0.858656554664746
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Promptable Foundation Models (FMs), initially introduced for natural image segmentation, have also revolutionized medical image segmentation. The increasing number of models, along with evaluations varying in datasets, metrics, and compared models, makes direct performance comparison between models difficult and complicates the selection of the most suitable model for specific clinical tasks. In our study, 11 promptable FMs are tested using non-iterative 2D and 3D prompting strategies on a private and public dataset focusing on bone and implant segmentation in four anatomical regions (wrist, shoulder, hip and lower leg). The Pareto-optimal models are identified and further analyzed using human prompts collected through a dedicated observer study. Our findings are: 1) The segmentation performance varies a lot between FMs and prompting strategies; 2) The Pareto-optimal models in 2D are SAM and SAM2.1, in 3D nnInteractive and Med-SAM2; 3) Localization accuracy and rater consistency vary with anatomical structures, with higher consistency for simple structures (wrist bones) and lower consistency for complex structures (pelvis, tibia, implants); 4) The segmentation performance drops using human prompts, suggesting that performance reported on "ideal" prompts extracted from reference labels might overestimate the performance in a human-driven setting; 5) All models were sensitive to prompt variations. While two models demonstrated intra-rater robustness, it did not scale to inter-rater settings. We conclude that the selection of the most optimal FM for a human-driven setting remains challenging, with even high-performing FMs being sensitive to variations in human input prompts. Our code base for prompt extraction and model inference is available: https://github.com/CarolineMagg/segmentation-FM-benchmark/
Related papers
- A Systematic Evaluation of Imbalance Handling Methods in Biomedical Binary Classification [9.011003401201323]
This study systematically examined the impact of imbalance handling methods (IHMs) on predictive performance in biomedical binary classification.<n>We evaluated five representative IHMs: random undersampling (RUS), random oversampling (ROS), SMOTE, re-weighting (RW), and direct F1-score optimization (DMO)<n>Clear benefits were observed for more complex models and unstructured data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-13T21:57:38Z) - SAM 3D Body: Robust Full-Body Human Mesh Recovery [65.0108906331903]
We introduce SAM 3D Body (3DB), a promptable model for single-image full-body 3D human mesh recovery (HMR)<n>3DB estimates the human pose of the body, feet, and hands.<n>It is the first model to use a new parametric mesh representation, Momentum Human Rig (MHR), which decouples skeletal structure and surface shape.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-17T20:26:37Z) - Causal-SAM-LLM: Large Language Models as Causal Reasoners for Robust Medical Segmentation [4.286815457787583]
We introduce Causal-SAM-LLM, a novel framework that elevates Large Language Models (LLMs) to the role of causal reasoners.<n>First, Linguistic Adrial Disentanglement (LAD) employs a Vision-Language Model to generate rich, textual descriptions of confounding image styles.<n>Second, Test-Time Causal Intervention (TCI) provides an interactive mechanism where an LLM interprets a clinician's natural language command to modulate the segmentation decoder's features in real-time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-04T13:52:16Z) - Zero-shot capability of SAM-family models for bone segmentation in CT scans [1.6018376109260821]
We use non-iterative, optimal'' prompting strategies to test the zero-shot capability of SAM-family models for bone CT segmentation.
Our results show that the best settings depend on the model type and size, dataset characteristics and objective to optimize.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-13T14:16:22Z) - Enhanced segmentation of femoral bone metastasis in CT scans of patients using synthetic data generation with 3D diffusion models [0.06700983301090582]
We propose an automated data pipeline using 3D Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPM) to generalize on new images.
We created 5675 new volumes, then trained 3D U-Net segmentation models on real and synthetic data to compare segmentation performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-17T09:21:19Z) - PAM: A Propagation-Based Model for Segmenting Any 3D Objects across Multi-Modal Medical Images [11.373941923130305]
PAM (Propagating Anything Model) is a segmentation approach that uses a 2D prompt, like a bounding box or sketch, to create a complete 3D segmentation of medical image volumes.
It significantly outperformed existing models like MedSAM and SegVol, with an average improvement of over 18.1% in dice similarity coefficient (DSC) across 44 medical datasets and various object types.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-25T13:42:47Z) - The effect of data augmentation and 3D-CNN depth on Alzheimer's Disease
detection [51.697248252191265]
This work summarizes and strictly observes best practices regarding data handling, experimental design, and model evaluation.
We focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection, which serves as a paradigmatic example of challenging problem in healthcare.
Within this framework, we train predictive 15 models, considering three different data augmentation strategies and five distinct 3D CNN architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-13T10:40:41Z) - 3DSAM-adapter: Holistic adaptation of SAM from 2D to 3D for promptable tumor segmentation [52.699139151447945]
We propose a novel adaptation method for transferring the segment anything model (SAM) from 2D to 3D for promptable medical image segmentation.
Our model can outperform domain state-of-the-art medical image segmentation models on 3 out of 4 tasks, specifically by 8.25%, 29.87%, and 10.11% for kidney tumor, pancreas tumor, colon cancer segmentation, and achieve similar performance for liver tumor segmentation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-23T12:09:52Z) - Robustness Analysis on Foundational Segmentation Models [28.01242494123917]
In this work, we perform a robustness analysis of Visual Foundation Models (VFMs) for segmentation tasks.
We benchmark seven state-of-the-art segmentation architectures using 2 different datasets.
Our findings reveal several key insights: VFMs exhibit vulnerabilities to compression-induced corruptions, despite not outpacing all of unimodal models in robustness, multimodal models show competitive resilience in zero-shot scenarios, and VFMs demonstrate enhanced robustness for certain object categories.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-15T16:59:42Z) - Mine yOur owN Anatomy: Revisiting Medical Image Segmentation with Extremely Limited Labels [54.58539616385138]
We introduce a novel semi-supervised 2D medical image segmentation framework termed Mine yOur owN Anatomy (MONA)
First, prior work argues that every pixel equally matters to the model training; we observe empirically that this alone is unlikely to define meaningful anatomical features.
Second, we construct a set of objectives that encourage the model to be capable of decomposing medical images into a collection of anatomical features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-27T15:50:31Z) - Modelling the Distribution of 3D Brain MRI using a 2D Slice VAE [66.63629641650572]
We propose a method to model 3D MR brain volumes distribution by combining a 2D slice VAE with a Gaussian model that captures the relationships between slices.
We also introduce a novel evaluation method for generated volumes that quantifies how well their segmentations match those of true brain anatomy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-09T13:23:15Z) - Modeling Shared Responses in Neuroimaging Studies through MultiView ICA [94.31804763196116]
Group studies involving large cohorts of subjects are important to draw general conclusions about brain functional organization.
We propose a novel MultiView Independent Component Analysis model for group studies, where data from each subject are modeled as a linear combination of shared independent sources plus noise.
We demonstrate the usefulness of our approach first on fMRI data, where our model demonstrates improved sensitivity in identifying common sources among subjects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-11T17:29:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.