To Words and Beyond: Probing Large Language Models for Sentence-Level Psycholinguistic Norms of Memorability and Reading Times

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.12105v1
• Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 16:10:27 GMT
• Title: To Words and Beyond: Probing Large Language Models for Sentence-Level Psycholinguistic Norms of Memorability and Reading Times
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models produce estimates of psycholinguistic norms that correlate with human judgments.<n>We extend this approach to the previously unstudied features of sentence memorability and reading times.
• Score: 4.5166266531313966
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently been shown to produce estimates of psycholinguistic norms, such as valence, arousal, or concreteness, for words and multiword expressions, that correlate with human judgments. These estimates are obtained by prompting an LLM, in zero-shot fashion, with a question similar to those used in human studies. Meanwhile, for other norms such as lexical decision time or age of acquisition, LLMs require supervised fine-tuning to obtain results that align with ground-truth values. In this paper, we extend this approach to the previously unstudied features of sentence memorability and reading times, which involve the relationship between multiple words in a sentence-level context. Our results show that via fine-tuning, models can provide estimates that correlate with human-derived norms and exceed the predictive power of interpretable baseline predictors, demonstrating that LLMs contain useful information about sentence-level features. At the same time, our results show very mixed zero-shot and few-shot performance, providing further evidence that care is needed when using LLM-prompting as a proxy for human cognitive measures.

Related papers

• Presupposition and Reasoning in Conditionals: A Theory-Based Study of Humans and LLMs [1.0599607477285324]
  We compare human judgments and LLM predictions on a normed dataset of conditional sentences.<n>Results show that humans integrate probabilistic and pragmatic cues in their judgment.<n>We observe models that best match human ratings often lack coherent pragmatic reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T13:08:20Z)
• ExpliCa: Evaluating Explicit Causal Reasoning in Large Language Models [75.05436691700572]
  We introduce ExpliCa, a new dataset for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in explicit causal reasoning.<n>We tested seven commercial and open-source LLMs on ExpliCa through prompting and perplexity-based metrics.<n>Surprisingly, models tend to confound temporal relations with causal ones, and their performance is also strongly influenced by the linguistic order of the events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T14:23:14Z)
• Aggregation Artifacts in Subjective Tasks Collapse Large Language Models' Posteriors [74.04775677110179]
  In-context Learning (ICL) has become the primary method for performing natural language tasks with Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>In this work, we examine whether this is the result of the aggregation used in corresponding datasets, where trying to combine low-agreement, disparate annotations might lead to annotation artifacts that create detrimental noise in the prompt.<n>Our results indicate that aggregation is a confounding factor in the modeling of subjective tasks, and advocate focusing on modeling individuals instead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:16:00Z)
• Evaluating the Correctness of Inference Patterns Used by LLMs for Judgment [53.17596274334017]
  We evaluate the correctness of the detailed inference patterns of an LLM behind its seemingly correct outputs.<n>Experiments show that even when the language generation results appear correct, a significant portion of the inference patterns used by the LLM for the legal judgment may represent misleading or irrelevant logic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T08:33:39Z)
• Predicting Emotion Intensity in Polish Political Texts: Comparing Supervised Models and Large Language Models in a Resource-Poor Language [0.0]
  This study explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to predict emotion intensity in Polish political texts. The research compares the performance of several LLMs against a supervised model trained on an annotated corpus of 10,000 social media texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T19:53:14Z)
• Bayesian Statistical Modeling with Predictors from LLMs [5.5711773076846365]
  State of the art large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on a variety of benchmark tasks. This raises questions about the human-likeness of LLM-derived information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T11:33:30Z)
• Uncertainty Quantification for In-Context Learning of Large Language Models [52.891205009620364]
  In-context learning has emerged as a groundbreaking ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose a novel formulation and corresponding estimation method to quantify both types of uncertainties. The proposed method offers an unsupervised way to understand the prediction of in-context learning in a plug-and-play fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T18:46:24Z)
• Psychometric Predictive Power of Large Language Models [32.31556074470733]
  We find that instruction tuning does not always make large language models human-like from a cognitive modeling perspective. Next-word probabilities estimated by instruction-tuned LLMs are often worse at simulating human reading behavior than those estimated by base LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T17:19:14Z)
• Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
  We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools. Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions. Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z)
• Investigating the Utility of Surprisal from Large Language Models for Speech Synthesis Prosody [4.081433571732691]
  This paper investigates the use of word surprisal, a measure of the predictability of a word in a given context, as a feature to aid speech prosody synthesis. We conduct experiments using a large corpus of English text and large language models (LLMs) of varying sizes. We find that word surprisal and word prominence are moderately correlated, suggesting that they capture related but distinct aspects of language use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T12:49:44Z)
• Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarization [79.37850439866938]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for automatic summarization but the reasons behind their successes are poorly understood. We find instruction tuning, and not model size, is the key to the LLM's zero-shot summarization capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-31T18:46:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.