Predicting Emotion Intensity in Polish Political Texts: Comparing Supervised Models and Large Language Models in a Resource-Poor Language

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12141v1
• Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 19:53:14 GMT
• Title: Predicting Emotion Intensity in Polish Political Texts: Comparing Supervised Models and Large Language Models in a Resource-Poor Language
• Authors: Hubert Plisiecki, Piotr Koc, Maria Flakus, Artur Pokropek,
• Abstract summary: This study explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to predict emotion intensity in Polish political texts. The research compares the performance of several LLMs against a supervised model trained on an annotated corpus of 10,000 social media texts.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This study explores the use of large language models (LLMs) to predict emotion intensity in Polish political texts, a resource-poor language context. The research compares the performance of several LLMs against a supervised model trained on an annotated corpus of 10,000 social media texts, evaluated for the intensity of emotions by expert judges. The findings indicate that while the supervised model generally outperforms LLMs, offering higher accuracy and lower variance, LLMs present a viable alternative, especially given the high costs associated with data annotation. The study highlights the potential of LLMs in low-resource language settings and underscores the need for further research on emotion intensity prediction and its application across different languages and continuous features. The implications suggest a nuanced decision-making process to choose the right approach to emotion prediction for researchers and practitioners based on resource availability and the specific requirements of their tasks.

Related papers

• Generating bilingual example sentences with large language models as lexicography assistants [2.6550899846546527]
  We present a study of LLMs' performance in generating and rating example sentences for bilingual dictionaries across languages with varying resource levels. We evaluate the quality of LLM-generated examples against the GDEX (Good Dictionary EXample) criteria: typicality, informativeness, and intelligibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T06:45:48Z)
• In-Context Example Selection via Similarity Search Improves Low-Resource Machine Translation [20.704153242284114]
  We focus on machine translation (MT), a task that has been shown to benefit from in-context translation examples. No systematic studies have been published on how best to select examples, and mixed results have been reported on the usefulness of similarity-based selection. We find that sentence embedding similarity can improve MT, especially for low-resource language directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T09:07:32Z)
• Evaluating Linguistic Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs in the Lens of Few-Shot Learning [15.919493497867567]
  This study aims to evaluate the performance of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on the VALSE benchmark. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of state-of-the-art MLLMs, varying in model size and pretraining datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T11:26:47Z)
• A Survey on Human Preference Learning for Large Language Models [81.41868485811625]
  The recent surge of versatile large language models (LLMs) largely depends on aligning increasingly capable foundation models with human intentions by preference learning. This survey covers the sources and formats of preference feedback, the modeling and usage of preference signals, as well as the evaluation of the aligned LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T03:52:51Z)
• CUDRT: Benchmarking the Detection Models of Human vs. Large Language Models Generated Texts [9.682499180341273]
  Large language models (LLMs) have greatly enhanced text generation across industries. Their human-like outputs make distinguishing between human and AI authorship challenging. Current benchmarks mainly rely on static datasets, limiting their effectiveness in assessing model-based detectors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T12:43:40Z)
• Bridging the Bosphorus: Advancing Turkish Large Language Models through Strategies for Low-Resource Language Adaptation and Benchmarking [1.3716808114696444]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming crucial across various fields, emphasizing the urgency for high-quality models in underrepresented languages. This study explores the unique challenges faced by low-resource languages, such as data scarcity, model selection, evaluation, and computational limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T21:58:45Z)
• Quantifying Multilingual Performance of Large Language Models Across Languages [48.40607157158246]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) perform better on high-resource languages like English, German, and French, while their capabilities in low-resource languages remain inadequate. We propose the Language Ranker, an intrinsic metric designed to benchmark and rank languages based on LLM performance using internal representations. Our analysis reveals that high-resource languages exhibit higher similarity scores with English, demonstrating superior performance, while low-resource languages show lower similarity scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T16:53:16Z)
• Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars. We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English. Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
• Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
  This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks. We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z)
• A Survey of Large Language Models [81.06947636926638]
  Language modeling has been widely studied for language understanding and generation in the past two decades. Recently, pre-trained language models (PLMs) have been proposed by pre-training Transformer models over large-scale corpora. To discriminate the difference in parameter scale, the research community has coined the term large language models (LLM) for the PLMs of significant size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T17:28:46Z)
• A Comparative Study of Lexical Substitution Approaches based on Neural Language Models [117.96628873753123]
  We present a large-scale comparative study of popular neural language and masked language models. We show that already competitive results achieved by SOTA LMs/MLMs can be further improved if information about the target word is injected properly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-29T18:43:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.