GenAI Integration into Engineering Education: A Case Study of an Introductory Undergraduate Engineering Course

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13269v1
• Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 20:57:09 GMT
• Title: GenAI Integration into Engineering Education: A Case Study of an Introductory Undergraduate Engineering Course
• Abstract summary: This study purported to describe an engineering instructor's and seven teaching assistants' initial experiences of integrating GenAI into their undergraduate engineering course.<n>Overall, after GenAI integration, students' formative exercise performance increased, and a critical and reflective practice of learning about how to integrate GenAI into instruction provided informative insights.
• Score: 0.5541644538483946
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: GenAI has a potential to enhance the learning and teaching processes in engineering education. For instance, GenAI feedback on students' task performance can be effective depending on when such feedback is provided. However, little is known about how engineering faculty and instructors discover such potential within the scope of their instruction when they try out the technology for the first time. To this end, this study purported to describe an engineering instructor's and seven teaching assistants' initial experiences of integrating GenAI into their undergraduate engineering course and the corresponding changes in students' formative exercise performance. An embedded descriptive single case study design was employed. The corresponding research data included four interviews conducted at the beginning, middle and end of an academic semester, and students' formative exercise performance. Overall, after GenAI integration, students' formative exercise performance increased, and a critical and reflective practice of learning about how to integrate GenAI into instruction provided informative insights. Still, technology integration stayed at the level of replacing other instructional methods or increasing the efficiency of solving coding problems. It turned out to be exciting and surprising for students to be able to use GenAI in course work even though their use of the technology weakened over time. Our findings suggest that engineering teaching staff's initial experimental experiences with GenAI integration can be informative and provide context-specific practical insights. Therefore, it is reasonable for higher education institutions to encourage such experiences especially when there is a lot of unknown regarding an emerging technology.

Related papers

• Quick Build, Careful Check? Generative AI Use in Hackathons [83.0493885475068]
  We report an exploratory interview study with participants at an AI-themed hackathon in central Europe.<n>We found that participants used GenAI for purposes beyond coding, including learning unfamiliar topics, brainstorming, and preparing documentation.<n>We also found that all participants converged on an unwritten practice of checking GenAI output before using it, yet their ability to actually verify was constrained by time pressure and limited domain knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T08:59:18Z)
• Is Solving Better Than Evaluating GenAI Solutions? [45.714140455691485]
  This study compares evaluating GenAI-generated solutions with traditional problem solving in a junior-level algorithms course.<n>We found no statistically significant differences between groups in midterm scores, final exam scores, overall course grades, or exam problems structurally aligned with the homework interventions.<n>Students received significantly higher homework scores when evaluating GenAI-generated solutions, but this localized advantage did not translate into downstream gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-30T02:08:29Z)
• On the Role and Impact of GenAI Tools in Software Engineering Education [2.867517731896504]
  generative AI (GenAI) tools like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot have transformed how software is learned and written.<n>In software engineering (SE) education, these tools offer new opportunities for support, but also raise concerns about over-reliance, ethical use, and impacts on learning.<n>This study investigates how undergraduate SE students use GenAI tools, focusing on the benefits, challenges, ethical concerns, and instructional expectations that shape their experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T20:51:16Z)
• Generative AI in Training and Coaching: Redefining the Design Process of Learning Materials [44.99833362998488]
  We explore how AI integrates into the design process of learning materials, assessing its impact on efficiency, pedagogical quality, and the evolving role of human trainers and coaches.<n>Through qualitative interviews with professionals in education and corporate training, we identify the following key topics.<n>We derive how tools based on GenAI can successfully be implemented for trainers and coaches on an individual, organizational, systemic, and strategic level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T03:42:43Z)
• Using Generative AI in Software Design Education: An Experience Report [0.6827423171182154]
  Students were required to use GenAI to help complete a team-based assignment.<n>Students identified numerous ways ChatGPT helped them in their design process.<n>We identified several key lessons for educators in how to deploy GenAI in a software design class effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T18:40:16Z)
• From Recall to Reasoning: Automated Question Generation for Deeper Math Learning through Large Language Models [44.99833362998488]
  We investigated the first steps for optimizing content creation for advanced math.<n>We looked at the ability of GenAI to produce high-quality practice problems that are relevant to the course content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T08:30:10Z)
• Engineering Educators' Perspectives on the Impact of Generative AI in Higher Education [4.06279597585806]
  This study reports findings from a survey of engineering educators on their use of and perspectives toward generative AI.<n>We asked them about their use of and comfort with GenAI, their overall perspectives on GenAI, the challenges and potential harms of using it for teaching, learning, and research, and examined whether their approach to using and integrating GenAI in their classroom influenced their experiences with GenAI and perceptions of it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T21:29:53Z)
• Lessons for GenAI Literacy From a Field Study of Human-GenAI Augmentation in the Workplace [0.11704154007740832]
  This study compares the use of GenAI across three different functions - product development, software engineering, and digital content creation.<n>Findings show a wide variance in the use of GenAI and in the level of computing knowledge of users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T21:26:31Z)
• Beyond the Hype: A Comprehensive Review of Current Trends in Generative AI Research, Teaching Practices, and Tools [4.352985782794601]
  In 2024, new research started to emerge on the effects of GenAI usage in the computing classroom.<n>New data involve the use of GenAI to support classroom instruction at scale and to teach students how to code with GenAI.<n>New class of tools is emerging that can provide personalized feedback to students on their programming assignments or teach both programming and prompting skills at the same time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T11:01:11Z)
• Early Adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Computing Education: Emergent Student Use Cases and Perspectives in 2023 [38.83649319653387]
  There is limited prior research on computing students' use and perceptions of GenAI. We surveyed all computer science majors in a small engineering-focused R1 university. We discuss the impact of our findings on the emerging conversation around GenAI and education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-17T20:17:47Z)
• Hey GPT, Can You be More Racist? Analysis from Crowdsourced Attempts to Elicit Biased Content from Generative AI [41.96102438774773]
  This work presents the findings from a university-level competition, which challenged participants to design prompts for eliciting biased outputs from GenAI tools. We quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the competition submissions and identify a diverse set of biases in GenAI and strategies employed by participants to induce bias in GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T18:44:45Z)
• Model-based Maintenance and Evolution with GenAI: A Look into the Future [47.93555901495955]
  We argue that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) can be used as a means to address the limitations of Model-Based Engineering (MBM&E) We propose that GenAI can be used in MBM&E for: reducing engineers' learning curve, maximizing efficiency with recommendations, or serving as a reasoning tool to understand domain problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T23:13:26Z)
• An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence Education in the United Arab Emirates [53.04281982845422]
  We present an experience report of teaching an AI course to business executives in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Rather than focusing only on theoretical and technical aspects, we developed a course that teaches AI with a view to enabling students to understand how to incorporate it into existing business processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-02T20:59:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.