EnterpriseOps-Gym: Environments and Evaluations for Stateful Agentic Planning and Tool Use in Enterprise Settings

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.13594v1
• Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 21:09:39 GMT
• Title: EnterpriseOps-Gym: Environments and Evaluations for Stateful Agentic Planning and Tool Use in Enterprise Settings
• Abstract summary: We introduce EnterpriseOps-Gym, a benchmark designed to evaluate agentic planning in realistic enterprise settings.<n>Within this environment, agents are evaluated on 1,150 expert-curated tasks across eight mission-critical verticals.<n>Our evaluation of 14 frontier models reveals critical limitations in state-of-the-art models.
• Score: 8.341628877927244
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models are shifting from passive information providers to active agents intended for complex workflows. However, their deployment as reliable AI workers in enterprise is stalled by benchmarks that fail to capture the intricacies of professional environments, specifically, the need for long-horizon planning amidst persistent state changes and strict access protocols. In this work, we introduce EnterpriseOps-Gym, a benchmark designed to evaluate agentic planning in realistic enterprise settings. Specifically, EnterpriseOps-Gym features a containerized sandbox with 164 database tables and 512 functional tools to mimic real-world search friction. Within this environment, agents are evaluated on 1,150 expert-curated tasks across eight mission-critical verticals (including Customer Service, HR, and IT). Our evaluation of 14 frontier models reveals critical limitations in state-of-the-art models: the top-performing Claude Opus 4.5 achieves only 37.4% success. Further analysis shows that providing oracle human plans improves performance by 14-35 percentage points, pinpointing strategic reasoning as the primary bottleneck. Additionally, agents frequently fail to refuse infeasible tasks (best model achieves 53.9%), leading to unintended and potentially harmful side effects. Our findings underscore that current agents are not yet ready for autonomous enterprise deployment. More broadly, EnterpriseOps-Gym provides a concrete testbed to advance the robustness of agentic planning in professional workflows.

Related papers

• AgentMercury: Your Agent Can Synthesize Verifiable Environments for Business Scenarios at scale [6.489568846701505]
  We introduce AgentMercury, a framework for synthesizing executable environments from high-level business scenarios.<n>We construct 4,783 executable environments spanning 14 industries and 50 countries, and use them as training substrates for reinforcement learning.<n>We show that fine-tuning Qwen3.5-35B-A3B on construction traces increases executable authoring success from 3.3% to 83.3% on held-out business scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-21T00:15:45Z)
• ORAgentBench: Can LLM Agents Solve Challenging Operations Research Tasks End to End? [28.383940617377856]
  We introduce ORAgentBench, an execution-grounded benchmark for evaluating autonomous agents on operations research tasks.<n>It contains 107 human-reviewed tasks across diverse operational scenarios, each packaged with a natural-language brief, multi-file data, configuration artifacts, and a required submission schema.<n>Experiments with fourteen frontier agent-model configurations show that current agents remain far from reliable OR practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-18T04:43:23Z)
• Running the Gauntlet: Re-evaluating the Capabilities of Agents Beyond Familiar Environments [67.2234316079859]
  GauntletBench is a web-based benchmark for evaluating agent generalisation in challenging scenarios.<n>It focuses on three underexplored capabilities (temporal perception, graphical understanding, and 3D reasoning) across five less-covered professional applications.<n>Our empirical results reveal that frontier agentic systems remain far from achieving human-level performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-12T12:32:24Z)
• The Meta-Agent Challenge: Are Current Agents Capable of Autonomous Agent Development? [80.24951682268332]
  We introduce the Meta-Agent Challenge (MAC), an evaluation framework designed to test the capacity of frontier models for autonomous agent development.<n>To ensure evaluation integrity, this framework is secured by multi-layer defenses against reward hacking.<n>We demonstrate that meta-agents rarely match human-engineered baseline policies, and the few that do are dominated by proprietary frontier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T04:58:17Z)
• OccuBench: Evaluating AI Agents on Real-World Professional Tasks via Language Environment Simulation [57.505743202759646]
  OccuBench is a benchmark covering 100 real-world professional task scenarios across 10 industry categories and 65 specialized domains.<n>Our multi-agent synthesis pipeline automatically produces evaluation instances with guaranteed solvability, calibrated difficulty, and document-grounded diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T00:27:32Z)
• EnterpriseBench Corecraft: Training Generalizable Agents on High-Fidelity RL Environments [0.10934862523101825]
  We show that training AI agents on high-fidelity reinforcement learning environments produces capabilities that generalize beyond the training distribution.<n>We introduce CoreCraft, the first environment in EnterpriseBench, Surge AI's suite of agentic RL environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T04:35:46Z)
• OmniEAR: Benchmarking Agent Reasoning in Embodied Tasks [52.87238755666243]
  We present OmniEAR, a framework for evaluating how language models reason about physical interactions, tool usage, and multi-agent coordination in embodied tasks.<n>We model continuous physical properties and complex spatial relationships across 1,500 scenarios spanning household and industrial domains.<n>Our systematic evaluation reveals severe performance degradation when models must reason from constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T17:54:15Z)
• Routine: A Structural Planning Framework for LLM Agent System in Enterprise [10.989149053905587]
  The deployment of agent systems in an enterprise environment is often hindered by several challenges.<n>Common models lack domain-specific process knowledge, leading to disorganized plans, missing key tools, and poor execution stability.<n>This paper introduces Routine, a multi-step agent planning framework designed with a clear structure, explicit instructions, and seamless parameter passing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-19T02:46:19Z)
• SetupBench: Assessing Software Engineering Agents' Ability to Bootstrap Development Environments [2.184775414778289]
  We introduce setupbench, a benchmark that isolates the environment-bootstrap skill.<n>Our tasks span seven language ecosystems, five database engines, and multi-service orchestration scenarios.<n>We find low success rates across task categories, with particular challenges in repository setup (38.9-57.4%) and local database configuration (20.0-53.3%)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T22:45:07Z)
• OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safety [58.201189860217724]
  We introduce OpenAgentSafety, a comprehensive framework for evaluating agent behavior across eight critical risk categories.<n>Unlike prior work, our framework evaluates agents that interact with real tools, including web browsers, code execution environments, file systems, bash shells, and messaging platforms.<n>It combines rule-based analysis with LLM-as-judge assessments to detect both overt and subtle unsafe behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T16:18:54Z)
• SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints [59.645885492637845]
  SOPBench is an evaluation pipeline that transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions.<n>Our approach transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions and requires agents to call these functions based on natural language SOP descriptions.<n>We evaluate 18 leading models, and results show the task is challenging even for top-tier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T17:53:02Z)
• WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agents [92.3291458543633]
  We build an environment for language-guided agents that is highly realistic and reproducible. We focus on agents that perform tasks on the web, and create an environment with fully functional websites from four common domains. We release a set of benchmark tasks focusing on evaluating the functional correctness of task completions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T22:59:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.