AI-Generated Figures in Academic Publishing: Policies, Tools, and Practical Guidelines
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16159v1
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 06:25:21 GMT
- Title: AI-Generated Figures in Academic Publishing: Policies, Tools, and Practical Guidelines
- Abstract summary: This paper surveys the current stance of major journals and publishers on the use of AI-generated figures.<n>We identify key concerns raised by publishers, including authorship attribution, and potential for visual misinformation.<n>We propose a set of best-practice guidelines for researchers seeking to use AI figure-generation tools in a compliant and transparent manner.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The rapid advancement of generative AI has introduced a new class of tools capable of producing publication-quality scientific figures, graphical abstracts, and data visualizations. However, academic publishers have responded with inconsistent and often ambiguous policies regarding AI-generated imagery. This paper surveys the current stance of major journals and publishers -- including Nature, Science, Cell Press, Elsevier, and PLOS -- on the use of AI-generated figures. We identify key concerns raised by publishers, including reproducibility, authorship attribution, and potential for visual misinformation. Drawing on practical examples from tools such as SciDraw, an AI-powered platform designed specifically for scientific illustration, we propose a set of best-practice guidelines for researchers seeking to use AI figure-generation tools in a compliant and transparent manner. Our findings suggest that, with appropriate disclosure and quality control, AI-generated figures can meaningfully accelerate scientific communication without compromising integrity.
Related papers
- SciToolAgent-Evo: An Ontology-Aware Self-Evolving Agent for Open-World Scientific Tool Acquisition [53.36281538053445]
We propose SciToolAgent-Evo, an ontology-aware self-evolving agent for open-world scientific tool acquisition.<n> Driven by an evolving memory of skills, experiences, and an ontologized tool graph, it distills generalizable knowledge from contrastive trajectories during accumulation.<n>Once a novel tool is acquired, its scientific knowledge is completed online for seamless integration into the known graph.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-30T08:47:11Z) - Querying Multimodal Scientific Papers with AI: Practices and Preferences Across Blind, Low-Vision, and Sighted Scientists [19.90873686121111]
Blind or low-vision (BLV) scientists have traditionally relied on static alternative text to access figures in papers.<n>The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has made interactive question-answering (QA) a feasible paradigm for visual exploration.<n>We interview five BLV and five sighted scientists across different STEM fields to understand how they use two AI tools, ChatGPT and Gemini, to query multimodal scientific documents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-20T21:14:26Z) - PaperBanana: Automating Academic Illustration for AI Scientists [58.120067704652314]
PaperBanana is an agentic framework for automated generation of publication-ready academic illustrations.<n>Powered by state-of-the-art VLMs and image generation models, PaperBanana orchestrates specialized agents to retrieve references, plan content and style, render images, and iteratively refine via self-critique.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-30T18:33:37Z) - Towards AI-Supported Research: a Vision of the TIB AIssistant [6.36260975777314]
We present the vision of the TIB AIssistant, a domain-agnostic human-machine collaborative platform designed to support researchers across disciplines in scientific discovery.<n>We describe the conceptual framework, system architecture, and implementation of an early prototype that demonstrates the feasibility and potential impact of our approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-18T12:08:46Z) - AI4X Roadmap: Artificial Intelligence for the advancement of scientific pursuit and its future directions [65.44445343399126]
We look at AI-enabled science across biology, chemistry, climate science, mathematics, materials science, physics, self-driving laboratories and unconventional computing.<n>Several shared themes emerge: the need for diverse and trustworthy data, transferable electronic-structure and interatomic models, AI systems integrated into end-to-end scientific synthesis.<n>Across domains, we highlight how large foundation models, active learning and self-driving laboratories can close loops between prediction and validation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-26T02:10:28Z) - Understanding Student Acceptance, Trust, and Attitudes Toward AI-Generated Images for Educational Purposes [1.0878040851637998]
This study assesses students' acceptance, trust, and positive attitudes towards AI-generated images for educational tasks.
The results reveal high acceptance, trust, and positive attitudes among students who value the ease of use and potential academic benefits.
These findings suggest a need for developing comprehensive guidelines that address ethical considerations and intellectual property issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-24T04:39:48Z) - Perceptions and Detection of AI Use in Manuscript Preparation for
Academic Journals [1.881901067333374]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have produced both excitement and worry about how AI will impact academic writing.
Authors of academic publications may decide to voluntarily disclose any AI tools they use to revise their manuscripts.
journals and conferences could begin mandating disclosure and/or turn to using detection services.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-19T06:04:46Z) - State of the Art on Diffusion Models for Visual Computing [191.6168813012954]
This report introduces the basic mathematical concepts of diffusion models, implementation details and design choices of the popular Stable Diffusion model.
We also give a comprehensive overview of the rapidly growing literature on diffusion-based generation and editing.
We discuss available datasets, metrics, open challenges, and social implications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-11T05:32:29Z) - AI-Generated Images as Data Source: The Dawn of Synthetic Era [61.879821573066216]
generative AI has unlocked the potential to create synthetic images that closely resemble real-world photographs.
This paper explores the innovative concept of harnessing these AI-generated images as new data sources.
In contrast to real data, AI-generated data exhibit remarkable advantages, including unmatched abundance and scalability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T06:55:19Z) - Measuring Ethics in AI with AI: A Methodology and Dataset Construction [1.6861004263551447]
We propose to use such newfound capabilities of AI technologies to augment our AI measuring capabilities.
We do so by training a model to classify publications related to ethical issues and concerns.
We highlight the implications of AI metrics, in particular their contribution towards developing trustful and fair AI-based tools and technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-26T00:26:12Z) - Self-Supervised Learning for Visual Summary Identification in Scientific
Publications [21.26121265868308]
We create a new benchmark dataset for selecting figures to serve as visual summaries of publications based on their abstracts.
We develop a self-supervised learning approach, based on matching of inline references to figures with figure captions.
Experiments in both biomedical and computer science domains show that our model is able to outperform the state of the art.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-21T09:48:58Z) - A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented.
This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.