MLLM-based Textual Explanations for Face Comparison

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16629v2
• Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 19:45:53 GMT
• Title: MLLM-based Textual Explanations for Face Comparison
• Abstract summary: We systematically analyze MLLM-generated explanations for the unconstrained face verification task.<n>Our results show that even when MLLMs produce correct verification decisions, the accompanying explanations frequently rely on non-verifiable or hallucinated facial attributes.
• Score: 9.423763930383755
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently been proposed as a means to generate natural-language explanations for face recognition decisions. While such explanations facilitate human interpretability, their reliability on unconstrained face images remains underexplored. In this work, we systematically analyze MLLM-generated explanations for the unconstrained face verification task on the challenging IJB-S dataset, with a particular focus on extreme pose variation and surveillance imagery. Our results show that even when MLLMs produce correct verification decisions, the accompanying explanations frequently rely on non-verifiable or hallucinated facial attributes that are not supported by visual evidence. We further study the effect of incorporating information from traditional face recognition systems, viz., scores and decisions, alongside the input images. Although such information improves categorical verification performance, it does not consistently lead to faithful explanations. To evaluate the explanations beyond decision accuracy, we introduce a likelihood-ratio-based framework that measures the evidential strength of textual explanations. Our findings highlight fundamental limitations of current MLLMs for explainable face recognition and underscore the need for a principled evaluation of reliable and trustworthy explanations in biometric applications. Code is available at https://github.com/redwankarimsony/LR-MLLMFR-Explainability.

Related papers

• Vision Language Model Fusion for Explainable Face Recognition [8.078681487621667]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) provide a promising foundation for explainable face recognition.<n>This work investigates whether multiple VLMs can be combined to improve recognition accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-25T11:44:31Z)
• Faithfulness Serum: Mitigating the Faithfulness Gap in Textual Explanations of LLM Decisions via Attribution Guidance [57.17102098930037]
  Large language models (LLMs) achieve strong performance and have revolutionized NLP.<n>Their lack of explainability keeps them treated as black boxes, limiting their use in domains that demand transparency and trust.<n>We introduce a training-free method that enhances faithfulness by guiding explanation generation through attention-level interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-15T18:32:32Z)
• VerLM: Explaining Face Verification Using Natural Language [50.56081916981731]
  We introduce an innovative Vision-Language Model (VLM) for Face Verification.<n>Our model is uniquely trained using two complementary explanation styles.<n>The proposed VLM integrates sophisticated feature extraction techniques with advanced reasoning capabilities, enabling clear articulation of its verification process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T05:16:07Z)
• Seeing Before Reasoning: A Unified Framework for Generalizable and Explainable Fake Image Detection [58.82268659497348]
  We argue that the root of this failure lies in a fundamental mismatch: MLLMs are asked to reason about fakes before they can truly see them.<n>We propose Forensic-Chat, a generalizable, explainable, and still-conversational assistant for fake image detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T20:59:19Z)
• ForenX: Towards Explainable AI-Generated Image Detection with Multimodal Large Language Models [82.04858317800097]
  We present ForenX, a novel method that not only identifies the authenticity of images but also provides explanations that resonate with human thoughts.<n>ForenX employs the powerful multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to analyze and interpret forensic cues.<n>We introduce ForgReason, a dataset dedicated to descriptions of forgery evidences in AI-generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T15:21:26Z)
• FaceInsight: A Multimodal Large Language Model for Face Perception [69.06084304620026]
  We propose FaceInsight, a versatile face perception large language model (MLLM) that provides fine-grained facial information.<n>Our approach introduces visual-textual alignment of facial knowledge to model both uncertain dependencies and deterministic relationships among facial information.<n> Comprehensive experiments and analyses across three face perception tasks demonstrate that FaceInsight consistently outperforms nine compared MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T06:31:57Z)
• VERIFY: A Benchmark of Visual Explanation and Reasoning for Investigating Multimodal Reasoning Fidelity [34.29409506366145]
  VERIFY is a benchmark designed to isolate and rigorously evaluate the visual reasoning capabilities of state-of-the-art MLLMs.<n>Each problem is accompanied by a human-annotated reasoning path, making it the first to provide in-depth evaluation of model decision-making processes.<n>We propose novel metrics that assess visual reasoning fidelity beyond mere accuracy, highlighting critical imbalances in current model reasoning patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T16:26:11Z)
• Can LLMs Produce Faithful Explanations For Fact-checking? Towards Faithful Explainable Fact-Checking via Multi-Agent Debate [75.10515686215177]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in text generation, but their capability for producing faithful explanations in fact-checking remains underexamined. We propose the Multi-Agent Debate Refinement (MADR) framework, leveraging multiple LLMs as agents with diverse roles. MADR ensures that the final explanation undergoes rigorous validation, significantly reducing the likelihood of unfaithful elements and aligning closely with the provided evidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T04:32:33Z)
• FaithLM: Towards Faithful Explanations for Large Language Models [60.45183469474916]
  We introduce FaithLM, a model-agnostic framework that evaluates and improves the faithfulness of large language models.<n>We show that FaithLM consistently increases faithfulness and produces explanations more aligned with human rationales than strong self-explanation baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T09:09:14Z)
• From Understanding to Utilization: A Survey on Explainability for Large Language Models [27.295767173801426]
  This survey underscores the imperative for increased explainability in Large Language Models (LLMs) Our focus is primarily on pre-trained Transformer-based LLMs, which pose distinctive interpretability challenges due to their scale and complexity. When considering the utilization of explainability, we explore several compelling methods that concentrate on model editing, control generation, and model enhancement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T16:09:53Z)
• Quantifying Uncertainty in Natural Language Explanations of Large Language Models [29.34960984639281]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as powerful tools for high-stakes natural language processing (NLP) applications. We propose two novel metrics -- $textitVerbalized Uncertainty$ and $textitProbing Uncertainty$ -- to quantify the uncertainty of generated explanations. Our empirical analysis of benchmark datasets reveals that verbalized uncertainty is not a reliable estimate of explanation confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T21:14:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.