Whose Knowledge Counts? Co-Designing Community-Centered AI Auditing Tools with Educators in Hawai`i
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16646v1
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:17:08 GMT
- Title: Whose Knowledge Counts? Co-Designing Community-Centered AI Auditing Tools with Educators in Hawai`i
- Abstract summary: generative AI is being deployed into classrooms with promises of aiding teachers.<n> educators caution that these tools can have unintended pedagogical repercussions.<n>We investigate these challenges in Hawaii, where public schools operate under a statewide mandate to integrate Hawaiian language and culture into education.
- Score: 47.69971984043272
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Although generative AI is being deployed into classrooms with promises of aiding teachers, educators caution that these tools can have unintended pedagogical repercussions, including cultural misrepresentation and bias. These concerns are heightened in low-resource language and Indigenous education settings, where AI systems frequently underperform. We investigate these challenges in Hawai`i, where public schools operate under a statewide mandate to integrate Hawaiian language and culture into education. Through four co-design workshops with 22 public school educators, we surfaced concerns about using generative AI in educational settings, particularly around cultural misrepresentation, and corresponding designs for auditing tools that address these issues. We find that educators envision tools grounded in specific Hawaiian cultural values and practices, such as tracing the genealogy of knowledge in source materials. Building on these insights, we conceptualize AI auditing as a community-oriented process rather than the work of isolated individuals, and discuss implications for designing auditing tools.
Related papers
- Learning by Chatting? Investigating the Impact of Generative AI on Information Seeking and Learning [33.12893683348563]
Generative AI (GenAI) tools offer opportunities for augmenting human cognitive tasks.<n>Among these tasks, information seeking is rapidly reshaped by GenAI tools, with potentially profound implications for learning and knowledge acquisition.<n>We conducted a field experiment in which participants sought information through either ChatGPT or Google Search over a span of 8 days.<n>Our findings show that participants in the ChatGPT group experienced diminished agency in their information-seeking processes, as they offloaded much of the information selection to AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-10T05:28:32Z) - Human Experts' Evaluation of Generative AI for Contextualizing STEAM Education in the Global South [0.639147752530381]
STEAM education in many parts of the Global South remains abstract and weakly connected to learners sociocultural realities.<n>This study examines how human experts evaluate the capacity of Generative AI (GenAI) to contextualize STEAM instruction in these settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-23T01:14:17Z) - "I Would Never Trust Anything Western": Kumu (Educator) Perspectives on Use of LLMs for Culturally Revitalizing CS Education in Hawaiian Schools [0.0]
This study explores the perceived benefits and limitations of using large language models for computer science education in Hawaiian public schools with Kaiapuni programs.<n>Our findings highlight AI's time-saving advantages while exposing challenges such as cultural misalignment and reliability concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-29T19:05:33Z) - "From Unseen Needs to Classroom Solutions": Exploring AI Literacy Challenges & Opportunities with Project-based Learning Toolkit in K-12 Education [0.3994567502796064]
There is a growing need to equip K-12 students with AI literacy skills that extend beyond computer science.<n>This paper explores the integration of a Project-Based Learning (PBL) AI toolkit into diverse subject areas, aimed at helping educators teach AI concepts more effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-23T03:31:02Z) - Navigating the Future of Education: Educators' Insights on AI Integration and Challenges in Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Ireland and Armenia [1.7205106391379026]
This paper aims to explore how teachers currently use AI and how it can enhance the educational process.
We conducted a cross-national study spanning Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Ireland, and Armenia, surveying 1754 educators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-28T10:22:05Z) - Higher education assessment practice in the era of generative AI tools [0.37282630026096586]
This study experimented using three assessment instruments from data science, data analytics, and construction management disciplines.
Our findings revealed that GenAI tools exhibit subject knowledge, problem-solving, analytical, critical thinking, and presentation skills.
Based on our findings, we made recommendations on how AI tools can be utilised for teaching and learning in HE.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-01T10:43:50Z) - Generative AI in Education: A Study of Educators' Awareness, Sentiments, and Influencing Factors [2.217351976766501]
This study delves into university instructors' experiences and attitudes toward AI language models.
We find no correlation between teaching style and attitude toward generative AI.
While CS educators show far more confidence in their technical understanding of generative AI tools, they show no more confidence in their ability to detect AI-generated work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-22T19:21:29Z) - Charting the Future of AI in Project-Based Learning: A Co-Design
Exploration with Students [35.05435052195561]
The increasing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by students in learning presents new challenges for assessing their learning outcomes.
This paper introduces a co-design study to explore the potential of students' AI usage data as a novel material for assessment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-26T14:49:29Z) - Exploring User Perspectives on ChatGPT: Applications, Perceptions, and
Implications for AI-Integrated Education [40.38809129759498]
ChatGPT is most commonly used in the domains of higher education, K-12 education, and practical skills training.
On one hand, some users view it as a transformative tool capable of amplifying student self-efficacy and learning motivation.
On the other hand, there is a degree of apprehension among concerned users.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-22T15:13:14Z) - Supporting Human-AI Collaboration in Auditing LLMs with LLMs [33.56822240549913]
Large language models have been shown to be biased and behave irresponsibly.
It is crucial to audit these language models rigorously.
Existing auditing tools leverage either or both humans and AI to find failures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-19T21:59:04Z) - Creation and Evaluation of a Pre-tertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Curriculum [58.86139968005518]
The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)-Jockey Club AI for the Future Project (AI4Future) co-created an AI curriculum for pre-tertiary education.
A team of 14 professors with expertise in engineering and education collaborated with 17 principals and teachers from 6 secondary schools to co-create the curriculum.
The co-creation process generated a variety of resources which enhanced the teachers knowledge in AI, as well as fostered teachers autonomy in bringing the subject matter into their classrooms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-19T11:26:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.