Efficient Brood Cell Detection in Layer Trap Nests for Bees and Wasps: Balancing Labeling Effort and Species Coverage

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16652v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 15:21:30 GMT
• Title: Efficient Brood Cell Detection in Layer Trap Nests for Bees and Wasps: Balancing Labeling Effort and Species Coverage
• Abstract summary: Layer trap nests (LTNs) are emerging as a valuable tool to study the abundance and species richness of wild bees and wasps.<n> manually evaluating LTNs to detect and classify brood cells is labor-intensive and time-consuming.<n>We propose a deep learning based approach for efficient brood cell detection and classification in LTNs.
• Score: 1.2508502162035755
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Monitoring cavity-nesting wild bees and wasps is vital for biodiversity research and conservation. Layer trap nests (LTNs) are emerging as a valuable tool to study the abundance and species richness of these insects, offering insights into their nesting activities and ecological needs. However, manually evaluating LTNs to detect and classify brood cells is labor-intensive and time-consuming. To address this, we propose a deep learning based approach for efficient brood cell detection and classification in LTNs. LTNs present additional challenges due to densely packed brood cells, leading to a high labeling effort per image. Moreover, we observe a significant imbalance in class distribution, with common species having notably more occurrences than rare species. Comprehensive labeling of common species is time-consuming and exacerbates data imbalance, while partial labeling introduces data incompleteness which degrades model performance. To reduce labeling effort and mitigate the impact of unlabeled data, we introduce a novel Constrained False Positive Loss (CFPL) strategy. CFPL dynamically masks predictions from unlabeled data, preventing them from interfering with the classification loss during training. We evaluate our approach on a dataset of 712 LTN images collected over one season, covering 28 fine-grained classes describing the taxonomy and status of brood cells. To minimize labeling effort, we limit the training set to a maximum of 300 labels per class. Experimental results demonstrate that deep learning can be effectively used to detect brood cells in LTNs. Our CFPL method further improves performance and balances model accuracy and labeling effort while also mitigating class imbalance.

Related papers

• Co-Training with Active Contrastive Learning and Meta-Pseudo-Labeling on 2D Projections for Deep Semi-Supervised Learning [42.56511266791916]
  SSL tackles this challenge by capitalizing on scarce labeled and abundant unlabeled data.<n>We present active-DeepFA, a method that effectively combines CL, teacher-student-based meta-pseudo-labeling and AL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T19:41:45Z)
• Revisiting Class Imbalance for End-to-end Semi-Supervised Object Detection [1.6249267147413524]
  Semi-supervised object detection (SSOD) has made significant progress with the development of pseudo-label-based end-to-end methods. Many methods face challenges due to class imbalance, which hinders the effectiveness of the pseudo-label generator. In this paper, we examine the root causes of low-quality pseudo-labels and present novel learning mechanisms to improve the label generation quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-04T06:01:53Z)
• All Points Matter: Entropy-Regularized Distribution Alignment for Weakly-supervised 3D Segmentation [67.30502812804271]
  Pseudo-labels are widely employed in weakly supervised 3D segmentation tasks where only sparse ground-truth labels are available for learning. We propose a novel learning strategy to regularize the generated pseudo-labels and effectively narrow the gaps between pseudo-labels and model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-25T08:19:31Z)
• Revisiting Pretraining for Semi-Supervised Learning in the Low-Label Regime [15.863530936691157]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) addresses the lack of labeled data by exploiting large unlabeled data through pseudolabeling. Recent studies combined finetuning (FT) from pretrained weights with SSL to mitigate the challenges and claimed superior results in the low-label regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-06T03:53:25Z)
• Incorporating Semi-Supervised and Positive-Unlabeled Learning for Boosting Full Reference Image Quality Assessment [73.61888777504377]
  Full-reference (FR) image quality assessment (IQA) evaluates the visual quality of a distorted image by measuring its perceptual difference with pristine-quality reference. Unlabeled data can be easily collected from an image degradation or restoration process, making it encouraging to exploit unlabeled training data to boost FR-IQA performance. In this paper, we suggest to incorporate semi-supervised and positive-unlabeled (PU) learning for exploiting unlabeled data while mitigating the adverse effect of outliers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-19T09:10:06Z)
• L2B: Learning to Bootstrap Robust Models for Combating Label Noise [52.02335367411447]
  This paper introduces a simple and effective method, named Learning to Bootstrap (L2B) It enables models to bootstrap themselves using their own predictions without being adversely affected by erroneous pseudo-labels. It achieves this by dynamically adjusting the importance weight between real observed and generated labels, as well as between different samples through meta-learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-09T05:57:08Z)
• Weakly Supervised Attention-based Models Using Activation Maps for Citrus Mite and Insect Pest Classification [7.6197178280107725]
  This work proposes an attention-based activation map approach developed to improve the classification of tiny regions. We apply our method in a two-stage network process called Attention-based Multiple Instance Learning Guided by Saliency Maps. Our approach infers bounding box locations for salient insects, even training without any location labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-02T21:42:22Z)
• Rethinking Pseudo Labels for Semi-Supervised Object Detection [84.697097472401]
  We introduce certainty-aware pseudo labels tailored for object detection. We dynamically adjust the thresholds used to generate pseudo labels and reweight loss functions for each category to alleviate the class imbalance problem. Our approach improves supervised baselines by up to 10% AP using only 1-10% labeled data from COCO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-01T01:32:03Z)
• Disentangling Sampling and Labeling Bias for Learning in Large-Output Spaces [64.23172847182109]
  We show that different negative sampling schemes implicitly trade-off performance on dominant versus rare labels. We provide a unified means to explicitly tackle both sampling bias, arising from working with a subset of all labels, and labeling bias, which is inherent to the data due to label imbalance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-12T15:40:13Z)
• Dynamic $\beta$-VAEs for quantifying biodiversity by clustering optically recorded insect signals [0.6091702876917281]
  We propose an adaptive variant of the variational autoencoder (VAE) capable of clustering data by phylogenetic groups. We demonstrate the usefulness of the dynamic $beta$-VAE on optically recorded insect signals from regions of southern Scandinavia.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-10T16:14:13Z)
• In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learning [53.1047775185362]
  Pseudo-labeling (PL) is a general SSL approach that does not have this constraint but performs relatively poorly in its original formulation. We argue that PL underperforms due to the erroneous high confidence predictions from poorly calibrated models. We propose an uncertainty-aware pseudo-label selection (UPS) framework which improves pseudo labeling accuracy by drastically reducing the amount of noise encountered in the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T23:29:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.