Bayesian Inference of Psychometric Variables From Brain and Behavior in Implicit Association Tests

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16741v1
• Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:20:55 GMT
• Title: Bayesian Inference of Psychometric Variables From Brain and Behavior in Implicit Association Tests
• Abstract summary: We establish a principled method for inferring mental health related psychometric variables from neural and behavioral data using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) as the data generation engine.<n>We propose a sparse hierarchical Bayesian model that leverages multi-modal data to predict experiences related to mental illness symptoms in new participants.
• Score: 0.786460153386845
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Objective. We establish a principled method for inferring mental health related psychometric variables from neural and behavioral data using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) as the data generation engine, aiming to overcome the limited predictive performance (typically under 0.7 AUC) of the gold-standard D-score method, which relies solely on reaction times. Approach. We propose a sparse hierarchical Bayesian model that leverages multi-modal data to predict experiences related to mental illness symptoms in new participants. The model is a multivariate generalization of the D-score with trainable parameters, engineered for parameter efficiency in the small-cohort regime typical of IAT studies. Data from two IAT variants were analyzed: a suicidality-related E-IAT ($n=39$) and a psychosis-related PSY-IAT ($n=34$). Main Results. Our approach overcomes a high inter-individual variability and low within-session effect size in the dataset, reaching AUCs of 0.73 (E-IAT) and 0.76 (PSY-IAT) in the best modality configurations, though corrected 95% confidence intervals are wide ($\pm 0.18$) and results are marginally significant after FDR correction ($q=0.10$). Restricting the E-IAT to MDD participants improves AUC to 0.79 $[0.62, 0.97]$ (significant at $q=0.05$). Performance is on par with the best reference methods (shrinkage LDA and EEGNet) for each task, even when the latter were adapted to the task, while the proposed method was not. Accuracy was substantially above near-chance D-scores (0.50-0.53 AUC) in both tasks, with more consistent cross-task performance than any single reference method. Significance. Our framework shows promise for enhancing IAT-based assessment of experiences related to entrapment and psychosis, and potentially other mental health conditions, though further validation on larger and independent cohorts will be needed to establish clinical utility.

Related papers

• Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Interpretable Keystroke Biomarkers in Parkinson's Disease [0.0]
  Keystroke dynamics have been explored extensively as a passive digital biomarker for Parkinson's disease (PD)<n>We apply inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) to keystroke data, modeling each keystroke as a discrete choice over typing speed and recovering.<n>To our knowledge this is the first application of IRL to keystroke dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-24T01:11:05Z)
• Predicting Neuromodulation Outcome for Parkinson's Disease with Generative Virtual Brain Model [95.41752463487008]
  Parkinson's disease affects over ten million people worldwide.<n>Inter-individual variability limits empirical treatment selection, increasing non-negligible surgical risk and cost.<n>We bridge this gap with a pretraining-finetuning framework to predict outcomes directly from resting-state fMRI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T02:36:10Z)
• An Adaptive Machine Learning Triage Framework for Predicting Alzheimer's Disease Progression [12.418201300163545]
  Accurate predictions of conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD) can enable effective personalized therapy.<n>We design a two-stage machine learning framework that selectively obtains advanced, costly features based on their predicted "value of information"<n>Our framework reduces the need for advanced testing by 20% while achieving a test AUROC of 0.929, comparable to the model that uses both basic and advanced features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T03:57:56Z)
• Causal Machine Learning for Surgical Interventions [3.701687265960785]
  Surgical decision-making is complex and requires understanding causal relationships between patient characteristics, interventions, and outcomes.<n>In this study, we develop a multi-task meta-learning framework, X-MultiTask, for ITE estimation.<n>By providing robust, patient-specific causal estimates, X-MultiTask offers a powerful tool to advance personalized surgical care and improve patient outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T02:31:43Z)
• Latent Space Data Fusion Outperforms Early Fusion in Multimodal Mental Health Digital Phenotyping Data [0.0]
  Mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety require improved methods for early detection and personalized intervention.<n>Traditional predictive models often rely on unimodal data or early fusion strategies that fail to capture the complex, multimodal nature of psychiatric data.<n>We evaluated intermediate (latent space) fusion for predicting daily depressive symptoms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T18:10:46Z)
• Comprehensive Methodology for Sample Augmentation in EEG Biomarker Studies for Alzheimers Risk Classification [0.0]
  Alzheimer's disease (AD), the leading type, accounts for 70% of cases.<n>EEG measures show promise in identifying AD risk, but obtaining large samples for reliable comparisons is challenging.<n>This study integrates signal processing, harmonization, and statistical techniques to enhance sample size and improve AD risk classification reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T10:31:02Z)
• Improving Bias Correction Standards by Quantifying its Effects on Treatment Outcomes [54.18828236350544]
  Propensity score matching (PSM) addresses selection biases by selecting comparable populations for analysis. Different matching methods can produce significantly different Average Treatment Effects (ATE) for the same task, even when meeting all validation criteria. To address this issue, we introduce a novel metric, A2A, to reduce the number of valid matches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T12:42:24Z)
• Understanding, Predicting and Better Resolving Q-Value Divergence in Offline-RL [86.0987896274354]
  We first identify a fundamental pattern, self-excitation, as the primary cause of Q-value estimation divergence in offline RL. We then propose a novel Self-Excite Eigenvalue Measure (SEEM) metric to measure the evolving property of Q-network at training. For the first time, our theory can reliably decide whether the training will diverge at an early stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T17:57:44Z)
• The effect of data augmentation and 3D-CNN depth on Alzheimer's Disease detection [51.697248252191265]
  This work summarizes and strictly observes best practices regarding data handling, experimental design, and model evaluation. We focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection, which serves as a paradigmatic example of challenging problem in healthcare. Within this framework, we train predictive 15 models, considering three different data augmentation strategies and five distinct 3D CNN architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T10:40:41Z)
• Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cost-Effective Medical Diagnosis [41.10546022107126]
  We use reinforcement learning to find a dynamic policy that selects lab test panels sequentially based on previous observations. We propose a Semi-Model-based Deep Diagnosis Policy Optimization framework that is compatible with end-to-end training and online learning. SM-DDPO is tested on diverse clinical tasks: ferritin abnormality detection, sepsis mortality prediction, and acute kidney injury diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-20T19:47:25Z)
• Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
  This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model. We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data. Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z)
• COVI-AgentSim: an Agent-based Model for Evaluating Methods of Digital Contact Tracing [68.68882022019272]
  COVI-AgentSim is an agent-based compartmental simulator based on virology, disease progression, social contact networks, and mobility patterns. We use COVI-AgentSim to perform cost-adjusted analyses comparing no DCT to: 1) standard binary contact tracing (BCT) that assigns binary recommendations based on binary test results; and 2) a rule-based method for feature-based contact tracing (FCT) that assigns a graded level of recommendation based on diverse individual features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T00:47:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.