Privacy and Safety Experiences and Concerns of U.S. Women Using Generative AI for Seeking Sexual and Reproductive Health Information
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.16918v1
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 20:53:13 GMT
- Title: Privacy and Safety Experiences and Concerns of U.S. Women Using Generative AI for Seeking Sexual and Reproductive Health Information
- Abstract summary: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 U.S.-based participants who had used GenAI chatbots to seek SRH information.<n>Participants identified multiple privacy risks, including excessive data collection, government surveillance, profiling, model training, and data commodification.<n>We offer design and policy recommendations, such as health-specific features and stronger moderation practices, to enhance privacy and safety in GenAI-supported SRH information seeking.
- Score: 10.983759918089456
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The rapid adoption of generative AI (GenAI) chatbots has reshaped access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information, particularly following the overturning of Roe v. Wade, as individuals assigned female at birth increasingly turn to online sources. However, existing research remains largely model-centered, paying limited attention to user privacy and safety. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 U.S.-based participants from both restrictive and non-restrictive states who had used GenAI chatbots to seek SRH information. Adoption was influenced by perceived utility, usability, credibility, accessibility, and anthropomorphism, and many participants disclosed sensitive personal SRH details. Participants identified multiple privacy risks, including excessive data collection, government surveillance, profiling, model training, and data commodification. While most participants accepted these risks in exchange for perceived utility, abortion-related queries elicited heightened safety concerns. Few participants employed protective strategies beyond minimizing disclosures or deleting data. Based on these findings, we offer design and policy recommendations, such as health-specific features and stronger moderation practices, to enhance privacy and safety in GenAI-supported SRH information seeking.
Related papers
- Neural Gate: Mitigating Privacy Risks in LVLMs via Neuron-Level Gradient Gating [71.55435880263238]
We introduce Neural Gate, a novel method for mitigating privacy risks through neuron-level model editing.<n>Our method improves a model's privacy safeguards by increasing its rate of refusal for privacy-related questions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-13T03:03:20Z) - SoK: Privacy Risks and Mitigations in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems [53.51921540246166]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques have become widely popular.<n>RAG involves the coupling of Large Language Models (LLMs) with domain-specific knowledge bases.<n>The proliferation of RAG has sparked concerns about data privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T14:50:41Z) - "I need to learn better searching tactics for privacy policy laws.'' Investigating Software Developers' Behavior When Using Sources on Privacy Issues [8.662963983664223]
Our study highlights major shortcomings in existing support for privacy-related development tasks.<n>Based on our findings, we discuss the need for more accessible, understandable, and actionable privacy resources for developers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-11T09:58:06Z) - "We are not Future-ready": Understanding AI Privacy Risks and Existing Mitigation Strategies from the Perspective of AI Developers in Europe [56.1653658714305]
We interviewed 25 AI developers based in Europe to understand which privacy threats they believe pose the greatest risk to users, developers, and businesses.<n>We find that there is little consensus among AI developers on the relative ranking of privacy risks.<n>While AI developers are aware of proposed mitigation strategies for addressing these risks, they reported minimal real-world adoption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-01T13:51:33Z) - Assessing metadata privacy in neuroimaging [2.176772544213644]
We reviewed data from six neuroimaging datasets openly available on OpenNeuro.<n>We found that privacy is generally well maintained, with serious vulnerabilities being rare.<n>We outline practical measures to address these risks, enabling safer data sharing practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-18T12:56:03Z) - Towards Privacy-aware Mental Health AI Models: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities [58.61680631581921]
Mental health disorders create profound personal and societal burdens, yet conventional diagnostics are resource-intensive and limit accessibility.<n>This paper examines these challenges and proposes solutions, including anonymization, synthetic data, and privacy-preserving training.<n>It aims to advance reliable, privacy-aware AI tools that support clinical decision-making and improve mental health outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-01T15:10:02Z) - Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks.<n>In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z) - Navigating AI to Unpack Youth Privacy Concerns: An In-Depth Exploration and Systematic Review [0.0]
This systematic literature review investigates perceptions, concerns, and expectations of young digital citizens regarding privacy in artificial intelligence (AI) systems.<n>Data extraction focused on privacy concerns, data-sharing practices, the balance between privacy and utility, trust factors in AI, and strategies to enhance user control over personal data.<n>Findings reveal significant privacy concerns among young users, including a perceived lack of control over personal information, potential misuse of data by AI, and fears of data breaches and unauthorized access.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-20T22:00:06Z) - Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Genomic Research: A Real-Life Deployment and Vision [2.7968600664591983]
This paper presents a privacy-preserving framework for genomic research, developed in collaboration with Lynx.MD.
The framework addresses critical cybersecurity and privacy challenges, enabling the privacy-preserving sharing and analysis of genomic data.
Implementing the framework within Lynx.MD involves encoding genomic data into binary formats and applying noise through controlled perturbation techniques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T05:43:13Z) - Privacy Risks of General-Purpose AI Systems: A Foundation for Investigating Practitioner Perspectives [47.17703009473386]
Powerful AI models have led to impressive leaps in performance across a wide range of tasks.
Privacy concerns have led to a wealth of literature covering various privacy risks and vulnerabilities of AI models.
We conduct a systematic review of these survey papers to provide a concise and usable overview of privacy risks in GPAIS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T07:49:48Z) - Generative AI for Secure and Privacy-Preserving Mobile Crowdsensing [74.58071278710896]
generative AI has attracted much attention from both academic and industrial fields.
Secure and privacy-preserving mobile crowdsensing (SPPMCS) has been widely applied in data collection/ acquirement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T04:00:58Z) - Security and Privacy on Generative Data in AIGC: A Survey [17.456578314457612]
We review the security and privacy on generative data in AIGC.
We reveal the successful experiences of state-of-the-art countermeasures in terms of the foundational properties of privacy, controllability, authenticity, and compliance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-18T02:35:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.