Starting Off on the Wrong Foot: Pitfalls in Data Preparation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18190v1
• Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 18:37:33 GMT
• Title: Starting Off on the Wrong Foot: Pitfalls in Data Preparation
• Abstract summary: This study illustrates that conventional data preparation procedures often yield unreliable and unstable results.<n>We propose a novel data preparation framework leveraging two recent statistical advancements.<n>Our findings demonstrate that incorporating statistically rigorous data preparation methods significantly enhances model robustness and interpretability.
• Score: 6.654947289826598
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: When working with real-world insurance data, practitioners often encounter challenges during the data preparation stage that can undermine the statistical validity and reliability of downstream modeling. This study illustrates that conventional data preparation procedures such as random train-test partitioning, often yield unreliable and unstable results when confronted with highly imbalanced insurance loss data. To mitigate these limitations, we propose a novel data preparation framework leveraging two recent statistical advancements: support points for representative data splitting to ensure distributional consistency across partitions, and the Chatterjee correlation coefficient for initial, non-parametric feature screening to capture feature relevance and dependence structure. We further integrate these theoretical advances into a unified, efficient framework that also incorporates missing-data handling, and embed this framework within our custom InsurAutoML pipeline. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated using both simulated datasets and datasets often cited in the academic literature. Our findings definitively demonstrate that incorporating statistically rigorous data preparation methods not only significantly enhances model robustness and interpretability but also substantially reduces computational resource requirements across diverse insurance loss modeling tasks. This work provides a crucial methodological upgrade for achieving reliable results in high stakes insurance applications.

Related papers

• Conformal Reliability: A New Evaluation Metric for Conditional Generation [62.761166941396844]
  Conditional generative models have recently remarkable success in various applications.<n>We propose a novel evaluation metric called reliability based on prediction set at a pre-specified confidence level.<n>We introduce Conformal ReLiability (CReL), a framework that can (i) construct a prediction set and (ii) accurately optimize the reliability score within the constructed prediction set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T03:52:44Z)
• Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal Likelihood [53.29070892356214]
  We propose jointly learning individual feature and sample relevancies, enabling simultaneous model and data sparsification.<n>This symmetric pruning of model and data offers a natural extension that preserves conjugacy.<n> Empirical results across diverse regression tasks affirm that a joint ARD approach consistently yields both sparse and robust prediction models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T13:26:53Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Data-Efficient AI: An Information-Theoretic Perspective [48.073471560778984]
  In context-specific applications such as robotics, telecommunications, and healthcare, artificial intelligence systems often face the challenge of limited training data.<n>This review paper examines formal methodologies that address data-limited regimes through two complementary approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T21:44:22Z)
• Cross-Learning from Scarce Data via Multi-Task Constrained Optimization [70.90607489166648]
  This paper introduces a multi-task emphcross-learning framework to overcome data scarcity.<n>We formulate this joint estimation as a constrained optimization problem.<n>We show the efficiency of our cross-learning method in applications with real data including image classification and propagation of infectious diseases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T18:35:59Z)
• Improving the Generation and Evaluation of Synthetic Data for Downstream Medical Causal Inference [89.5628648718851]
  Causal inference is essential for developing and evaluating medical interventions.<n>Real-world medical datasets are often difficult to access due to regulatory barriers.<n>We present STEAM: a novel method for generating Synthetic data for Treatment Effect Analysis in Medicine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T16:16:00Z)
• Valid Inference with Imperfect Synthetic Data [39.10587411316875]
  We introduce a new estimator based on generalized method of moments.<n>We find that interactions between the moment residuals of synthetic data and those of real data can greatly improve estimates of the target parameter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T18:32:52Z)
• Frugal, Flexible, Faithful: Causal Data Simulation via Frengression [4.446798246007668]
  We introduce frengression, a deep generative realization of the frugal parameterization.<n>frengression provides accurate estimation and flexible, faithful simulation of time-varying data.<n>We envision this framework sparking new research into generative approaches for causal margin modelling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T18:43:59Z)
• A Theoretical Perspective: How to Prevent Model Collapse in Self-consuming Training Loops [55.07063067759609]
  High-quality data is essential for training large generative models, yet the vast reservoir of real data available online has become nearly depleted.<n>Models increasingly generate their own data for further training, forming Self-consuming Training Loops (STLs)<n>Some models degrade or even collapse, while others successfully avoid these failures, leaving a significant gap in theoretical understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T06:18:13Z)
• A Conformal Approach to Feature-based Newsvendor under Model Misspecification [2.801095519296785]
  We propose a model-free and distribution-free framework inspired by conformal prediction.<n>We validate our framework using both simulated data and a real-world dataset from the Capital Bikeshare program in Washington, D.C.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T18:34:43Z)
• MIBP-Cert: Certified Training against Data Perturbations with Mixed-Integer Bilinear Programs [50.41998220099097]
  Data errors, corruptions, and poisoning attacks during training pose a major threat to the reliability of modern AI systems.<n>We introduce MIBP-Cert, a novel certification method based on mixed-integer bilinear programming (MIBP)<n>By computing the set of parameters reachable through perturbed or manipulated data, we can predict all possible outcomes and guarantee robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T14:56:39Z)
• Ranking and Combining Latent Structured Predictive Scores without Labeled Data [2.5064967708371553]
  This paper introduces a novel structured unsupervised ensemble learning model (SUEL) It exploits the dependency between a set of predictors with continuous predictive scores, rank the predictors without labeled data and combine them to an ensembled score with weights. The efficacy of the proposed methods is rigorously assessed through both simulation studies and real-world application of risk genes discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T20:14:42Z)
• Perturbation-Assisted Sample Synthesis: A Novel Approach for Uncertainty Quantification [3.175239447683357]
  This paper introduces a novel Perturbation-Assisted Inference (PAI) framework utilizing synthetic data generated by the Perturbation-Assisted Sample Synthesis (PASS) method. The framework focuses on uncertainty quantification in complex data scenarios, particularly involving unstructured data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of PAI in advancing uncertainty quantification in complex, data-driven tasks by applying it to diverse areas such as image synthesis, sentiment word analysis, multimodal inference, and the construction of prediction intervals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T01:01:36Z)
• Training Deep Normalizing Flow Models in Highly Incomplete Data Scenarios with Prior Regularization [13.985534521589257]
  We propose a novel framework to facilitate the learning of data distributions in high paucity scenarios. The proposed framework naturally stems from posing the process of learning from incomplete data as a joint optimization task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-03T20:57:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.