Seeking Universal Shot Language Understanding Solutions
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18448v1
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 03:18:51 GMT
- Title: Seeking Universal Shot Language Understanding Solutions
- Abstract summary: Shot language understanding (SLU) is crucial for cinematic analysis but remains challenging due to its diverse cinematographic dimensions and subjective expert judgment.<n>We introduce SLU-SUITE, a comprehensive training and evaluation suite containing 490K human-annotated QA pairs across 33 tasks spanning six film-grounded dimensions.
- Score: 23.502892696009436
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Shot language understanding (SLU) is crucial for cinematic analysis but remains challenging due to its diverse cinematographic dimensions and subjective expert judgment. While vision-language models (VLMs) have shown strong ability in general visual understanding, recent studies reveal judgment discrepancies between VLMs and film experts on SLU tasks. To address this gap, we introduce SLU-SUITE, a comprehensive training and evaluation suite containing 490K human-annotated QA pairs across 33 tasks spanning six film-grounded dimensions. Using SLU-SUITE, we originally observe two insights into VLM-based SLU from: the model side, which diagnoses key bottlenecks of modules; the data side, which quantifies cross-dimensional influences among tasks. These findings motivate our universal SLU solutions from two complementary paradigms: UniShot, a balanced one-for-all generalist trained via dynamic-balanced data mixing, and AgentShots, a prompt-routed expert cluster that maximizes peak dimension performance. Extensive experiments show that our models outperform task-specific ensembles on in-domain tasks and surpass leading commercial VLMs by 22% on out-of-domain tasks.
Related papers
- A Comprehensive Information-Decomposition Analysis of Large Vision-Language Models [24.18585407100395]
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) achieve impressive performance, yet their internal decision-making processes remain opaque.<n>We introduce a novel framework using partial information decomposition (PID) to quantitatively measure the "information spectrum" of LVLMs.<n>Our analysis reveals two key results: (i) two task regimes (synergy-driven vs. knowledge-driven) and (ii) two stable, contrasting family-level strategies (fusion-centric vs. language-centric)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-31T12:32:29Z) - SECOND: Mitigating Perceptual Hallucination in Vision-Language Models via Selective and Contrastive Decoding [5.976839106353883]
SECOND: Selective and Contrastive Decoding is a novel approach that enables Vision-Language Models to leverage multi-scale visual information with an object-centric manner.<n> SECOND significantly reduces perceptual hallucinations and outperforms a wide range of benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-10T02:55:38Z) - Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Fine-Grained Image Tasks: A Comprehensive Evaluation [53.84282335629258]
We introduce a comprehensive fine-grained evaluation benchmark, i.e., FG-BMK, comprising 1.01 million questions and 0.33 million images.<n>Our evaluation systematically examines LVLMs from both human-oriented and machine-oriented perspectives.<n>We uncover key findings regarding the influence of training paradigms, modality alignment, perturbation susceptibility, and fine-grained category reasoning on task performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-21T09:30:41Z) - VOILA: Evaluation of MLLMs For Perceptual Understanding and Analogical Reasoning [63.0285363282581]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become a powerful tool for integrating visual and textual information.<n>We introduce VOILA, a benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs' perceptual understanding and abstract relational reasoning.<n>We reveal that current MLLMs struggle to comprehend inter-image relationships and exhibit limited capabilities in high-level relational reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T23:36:19Z) - iVISPAR -- An Interactive Visual-Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for VLMs [4.34964016971127]
iVISPAR is an interactive benchmark designed to evaluate the spatial reasoning capabilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) acting as agents.<n>The benchmark supports visual 3D, 2D, and text-based input modalities, enabling comprehensive assessments of VLMs' planning and reasoning skills.<n>Results indicate that while VLMs perform better on 2D tasks compared to 3D or text-based settings, they struggle with complex spatial configurations and consistently fall short of human performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-05T14:29:01Z) - Reasoning Paths with Reference Objects Elicit Quantitative Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models [61.899791071654654]
We introduce a benchmark, Q-Spatial Bench, with 271 questions across five categories designed for quantitative spatial reasoning.
We investigate the performance of state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs) on this task.
We develop a zero-shot prompting technique, SpatialPrompt, that encourages VLMs to answer quantitative spatial questions using reference objects as visual cues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-15T16:45:42Z) - Prism: A Framework for Decoupling and Assessing the Capabilities of VLMs [83.24033574914425]
We present Prism, an innovative framework designed to disentangle the perception and reasoning processes involved in visual question solving.
Prism comprises two distinct stages: a perception stage that utilizes a VLM to extract and articulate visual information in textual form, and a reasoning stage that formulates responses based on the extracted visual information.
Our analytical framework provides several valuable insights, underscoring Prism's potential as a cost-effective solution for vision-language tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T17:54:03Z) - Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models [73.40350756742231]
Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning.
Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T18:21:14Z) - Good Questions Help Zero-Shot Image Reasoning [110.1671684828904]
Question-Driven Visual Exploration (QVix) is a novel prompting strategy that enhances the exploratory capabilities of large vision-language models (LVLMs)
QVix enables a wider exploration of visual scenes, improving the LVLMs' reasoning accuracy and depth in tasks such as visual question answering and visual entailment.
Our evaluations on various challenging zero-shot vision-language benchmarks, including ScienceQA and fine-grained visual classification, demonstrate that QVix significantly outperforms existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-04T03:18:51Z) - ViCor: Bridging Visual Understanding and Commonsense Reasoning with Large Language Models [27.5219975853389]
We find that pre-trained vision-and-language models (VLMs) and large language models (LLMs) are good at different kinds of visual commonsense reasoning problems.
For problems where the goal is to infer conclusions beyond image content,VLMs face difficulties, while LLMs, given sufficient visual evidence, can use commonsense to infer the answer well.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T17:10:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.