MultihopSpatial: Multi-hop Compositional Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision-Language Model
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18892v1
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 13:33:26 GMT
- Title: MultihopSpatial: Multi-hop Compositional Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for Vision-Language Model
- Abstract summary: We introduce MultihopSpatial, a benchmark for multi-hop and compositional spatial reasoning.<n>A complementary metric, Acc@50IoU, evaluates reasoning and visual grounding by requiring both answer selection and precise bounding box prediction.<n>A dedicated large-scale training corpus, MultihopSpatial-Train, fosters spatial intelligence.
- Score: 51.107890058344644
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Spatial reasoning is foundational for Vision-Language Models (VLMs), particularly when deployed as Vision-Language-Action (VLA) agents in physical environments. However, existing benchmarks predominantly focus on elementary, single-hop relations, neglecting the multi-hop compositional reasoning and precise visual grounding essential for real-world scenarios. To address this, we introduce MultihopSpatial, offering three key contributions: (1) A comprehensive benchmark designed for multi-hop and compositional spatial reasoning, featuring 1- to 3-hop complex queries across diverse spatial perspectives. (2) Acc@50IoU, a complementary metric that simultaneously evaluates reasoning and visual grounding by requiring both answer selection and precise bounding box prediction - capabilities vital for robust VLA deployment. (3) MultihopSpatial-Train, a dedicated large-scale training corpus to foster spatial intelligence. Extensive evaluation of 37 state-of-the-art VLMs yields eight key insights, revealing that compositional spatial reasoning remains a formidable challenge. Finally, we demonstrate that reinforcement learning post-training on our corpus enhances both intrinsic VLM spatial reasoning and downstream embodied manipulation performance.
Related papers
- Imaginative Perception Tokens Enhance Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Language Models [61.89854422423702]
Vision language models (VLMs) excel at many tasks but struggle with spatial reasoning when critical information is not directly observable.<n>We introduce Imaginative Perception Tokens (IPT), intermediate perceptual representations that externalize what a VLM would perceive under alternative spatial configurations.<n>IPT supervision consistently improves spatial reasoning and often outperforms textual chain of thought training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-02T17:59:17Z) - Actial: Activate Spatial Reasoning Ability of Multimodal Large Language Models [75.45940282834327]
We introduce Viewpoint Learning, a task designed to evaluate and improve the spatial reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.<n>We present the Viewpoint-100K dataset, consisting of 100K object-centric image pairs with diverse viewpoints and corresponding question-answer pairs.<n>Our approach employs a two-stage fine-tuning strategy, resulting in significant improvements across multiple tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-03T14:27:00Z) - See&Trek: Training-Free Spatial Prompting for Multimodal Large Language Model [33.18304419115947]
We introduce SEE&TREK, the first training-free prompting framework to enhance the spatial understanding of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLM) under vision-only constraints.<n>We focus on increasing visual diversity and motion reconstruction.<n>Our method is training&GPU-free, requiring only a single forward pass, and can be seamlessly integrated into existing MLLMS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-19T15:30:26Z) - Enhancing Spatial Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models through Reasoning-based Segmentation [50.81551581148339]
We introduce Relevant Reasoning (R$2$S), a reasoning-based segmentation framework.<n>We also introduce 3D ReasonSeg, a reasoning-based segmentation dataset.<n>Both experiments demonstrate that the R$2$S and 3D ReasonSeg effectively endow 3D point cloud perception with stronger spatial reasoning capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-29T06:58:08Z) - ViewSpatial-Bench: Evaluating Multi-perspective Spatial Localization in Vision-Language Models [68.46716645478661]
Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and reasoning about visual content.<n>Current VLMs excel primarily at egocentric spatial reasoning (from the camera's perspective) but fail to generalize to allocentric viewpoints.<n>We introduce ViewSpatial-Bench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed specifically for multi-viewpoint spatial localization recognition evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T17:59:26Z) - SpatialScore: Towards Unified Evaluation for Multimodal Spatial Understanding [64.15606979785355]
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive success in question-answering tasks, yet their capabilities for spatial understanding are less explored.<n>This work investigates a critical question: do existing MLLMs possess 3D spatial perception and understanding abilities?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T17:59:03Z) - Sparkle: Mastering Basic Spatial Capabilities in Vision Language Models Elicits Generalization to Spatial Reasoning [36.588008658084895]
Vision language models (VLMs) perform well on many tasks but often fail at spatial reasoning.<n>Our evaluation shows that state-of-the-art VLMs give implausible or incorrect answers to composite spatial problems.<n>We enhance 2D spatial reasoning in VLMs by training them only on basic spatial capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T16:26:09Z) - GSR-BENCH: A Benchmark for Grounded Spatial Reasoning Evaluation via Multimodal LLMs [3.2688425993442696]
The ability to understand and reason about spatial relationships between objects in images is an important component of visual reasoning.
We extend the previously released What'sUp dataset and propose a novel comprehensive evaluation for spatial relationship understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T06:15:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.