Teleological Inference in Structural Causal Models via Intentional Interventions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.18968v1
• Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 14:33:46 GMT
• Title: Teleological Inference in Structural Causal Models via Intentional Interventions
• Abstract summary: Structural causal models (SCMs) were conceived to formulate and answer causal questions.<n>This paper shows that SCMs can also be used to formulate and answer teleological questions, concerning the intentions of a state-aware, goal-directed agent intervening in a causal system.
• Score: 1.6451639748812477
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Structural causal models (SCMs) were conceived to formulate and answer causal questions. This paper shows that SCMs can also be used to formulate and answer teleological questions, concerning the intentions of a state-aware, goal-directed agent intervening in a causal system. We review limitations of previous approaches to modeling such agents, and then introduce intentional interventions, a new time-agnostic operator that induces a twin SCM we call a structural final model (SFM). SFMs treat observed values as the outcome of intentional interventions and relate them to the counterfactual conditions of those interventions (what would have happened had the agent not intervened). We show how SFMs can be used to empirically detect agents and to discover their intentions.

Related papers

• CDFM: Towards a General-Purpose Causal Discovery Foundation Model [62.32138962508216]
  Causal discovery is the process of recovering underlying causal structures from observational data.<n>We formulate the Causal Discovery Foundation Model (CDFM) as a unified, general-purpose framework for zero-shot structural inference.<n>CDFM consistently outperforms traditional algorithms, driving a paradigm shift toward a general-purpose causal discovery foundation model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-13T12:58:28Z)
• Position: Anthropomorphic Misalignment Research Needs Stronger Evidence [52.76826423649968]
  We show how conceptual ambiguity, non-robust datasets, experimental design, and insufficient causal interventions can lead to overinterpretation of model behaviors.<n>This position paper aims to offer guidance on evidentiary considerations that can help improve methodological rigor in AMR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T16:38:53Z)
• Partially Observed Structural Causal Models [4.065430726803998]
  We introduce Partially Observed Structural Causal Models (POSCMs)<n>POSCMs formalize causal systems where latent contexts co-determine both the interaction structure and downstream mechanisms on observed variables.<n>We provide an identifiability theory that clarifies which intervention families would suffice to disentangle structure formation from mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-05T01:40:14Z)
• Generative Intervention Models for Causal Perturbation Modeling [80.72074987374141]
  In many applications, it is a priori unknown which mechanisms of a system are modified by an external perturbation.<n>We propose a generative intervention model (GIM) that learns to map these perturbation features to distributions over atomic interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T10:37:57Z)
• A Practical Approach to Causal Inference over Time [17.660953125689105]
  We define causal interventions and their effects over time on discrete-time processes (DSPs) We show under which conditions the equilibrium states of a DSP, both before and after a causal intervention, can be captured by a structural causal model (SCM) The resulting causal VAR framework allows us to perform causal inference over time from observational time series data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T13:45:20Z)
• Characterising Interventions in Causal Games [1.2289361708127877]
  Causal games are probabilistic graphical models that enable causal queries to be answered in multi-agent settings. We demonstrate applications to the design of safe AI systems by considering causal mechanism design and commitment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:55:07Z)
• Evaluating Interventional Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models [58.52919374786108]
  Large language models (LLMs) are used to automate decision-making tasks.<n>In this paper, we evaluate whether LLMs can accurately update their knowledge of a data-generating process in response to an intervention.<n>We create benchmarks that span diverse causal graphs (e.g., confounding, mediation) and variable types.<n>These benchmarks allow us to isolate the ability of LLMs to accurately predict changes resulting from their ability to memorize facts or find other shortcuts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T14:15:56Z)
• Distribution-consistency Structural Causal Models [6.276417011421679]
  We introduce a novel textitdistribution-consistency assumption, and in alignment with it, we propose the Distribution-consistency Structural Causal Models (DiscoSCMs) To concretely reveal the enhanced model capacity, we introduce a new identifiable causal parameter, textitthe probability of consistency, which holds practical significance within DiscoSCM alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T06:46:15Z)
• Modeling Causal Mechanisms with Diffusion Models for Interventional and Counterfactual Queries [10.818661865303518]
  We consider the problem of answering observational, interventional, and counterfactual queries in a causally sufficient setting. We introduce diffusion-based causal models (DCM) to learn causal mechanisms, that generate unique latent encodings. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate significant improvements over existing state-of-the-art methods for answering causal queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T04:08:08Z)
• Neural Causal Models for Counterfactual Identification and Estimation [62.30444687707919]
  We study the evaluation of counterfactual statements through neural models. First, we show that neural causal models (NCMs) are expressive enough. Second, we develop an algorithm for simultaneously identifying and estimating counterfactual distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T18:29:09Z)
• Structural Causal Models Are (Solvable by) Credal Networks [70.45873402967297]
  Causal inferences can be obtained by standard algorithms for the updating of credal nets. This contribution should be regarded as a systematic approach to represent structural causal models by credal networks. Experiments show that approximate algorithms for credal networks can immediately be used to do causal inference in real-size problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T11:19:36Z)
• Estimating the Effects of Continuous-valued Interventions using Generative Adversarial Networks [103.14809802212535]
  We build on the generative adversarial networks (GANs) framework to address the problem of estimating the effect of continuous-valued interventions. Our model, SCIGAN, is flexible and capable of simultaneously estimating counterfactual outcomes for several different continuous interventions. To address the challenges presented by shifting to continuous interventions, we propose a novel architecture for our discriminator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T18:46:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.