Pitfalls in Evaluating Interpretability Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20101v1
• Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 16:27:17 GMT
• Title: Pitfalls in Evaluating Interpretability Agents
• Abstract summary: We build an agentic system in which a research agent iteratively designs experiments and refines hypotheses.<n>Our work demonstrates fundamental challenges in evaluating complex automated interpretability systems.
• Score: 91.49742416116635
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Automated interpretability systems aim to reduce the need for human labor and scale analysis to increasingly large models and diverse tasks. Recent efforts toward this goal leverage large language models (LLMs) at increasing levels of autonomy, ranging from fixed one-shot workflows to fully autonomous interpretability agents. This shift creates a corresponding need to scale evaluation approaches to keep pace with both the volume and complexity of generated explanations. We investigate this challenge in the context of automated circuit analysis -- explaining the roles of model components when performing specific tasks. To this end, we build an agentic system in which a research agent iteratively designs experiments and refines hypotheses. When evaluated against human expert explanations across six circuit analysis tasks in the literature, the system appears competitive. However, closer examination reveals several pitfalls of replication-based evaluation: human expert explanations can be subjective or incomplete, outcome-based comparisons obscure the research process, and LLM-based systems may reproduce published findings via memorization or informed guessing. To address some of these pitfalls, we propose an unsupervised intrinsic evaluation based on the functional interchangeability of model components. Our work demonstrates fundamental challenges in evaluating complex automated interpretability systems and reveals key limitations of replication-based evaluation.

Related papers

• From Atomic to Agentic: Towards Interpretable Evaluation of LLMs' Agentic Mathematical Capabilities [103.60384544335072]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving from performing end-to-end mathematical reasoning to integrating agentic intelligence.<n>Our framework aligns problem-solving agentic behaviors with a structured taxonomy of reusable mathematical atomic capabilities.<n> Experiments reveal that models with similar end-to-end accuracy can exhibit markedly different agentic capability profiles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-27T10:52:06Z)
• An Experimental Design Approach to Evaluating Agentic AI's Autonomous Model Discovery [4.502708670326481]
  Large language model coding agents increasingly perform open-ended data modeling and analysis.<n>We propose an experimental design and analysis framework for evaluating this discovery process.<n>We develop a utility-aligned canonical decomposition to characterize the dominant direction of the reasoning-effort effect.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T15:43:22Z)
• The Story is Not the Science: Execution-Grounded Evaluation of Mechanistic Interpretability Research [56.80927148740585]
  We address the challenges of scalability and rigor by flipping the dynamic and developing AI agents as research evaluators.<n>We use mechanistic interpretability research as a testbed, build standardized research output, and develop MechEvalAgent.<n>Our work demonstrates the potential of AI agents to transform research evaluation and pave the way for rigorous scientific practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T19:00:02Z)
• PARC: An Autonomous Self-Reflective Coding Agent for Robust Execution of Long-Horizon Tasks [0.0]
  We introduce PARC, a coding agent for the autonomous execution of long-horizon computational tasks.<n>We evaluate PARC across computational science and data science tasks.<n>Results highlight the potential of integrating a hierarchical multi-agent system with self-assessment and self-feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T08:15:10Z)
• SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents [79.10991818561907]
  SelfAI is a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations.<n>An Experiment Manager orchestrates parallel, fault-tolerant training across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback.<n>Across regression, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-29T09:18:39Z)
• AgenticIQA: An Agentic Framework for Adaptive and Interpretable Image Quality Assessment [69.06977852423564]
  Image quality assessment (IQA) reflects both the quantification and interpretation of perceptual quality rooted in the human visual system.<n>AgenticIQA decomposes IQA into four subtasks -- distortion detection, distortion analysis, tool selection, and tool execution.<n>To support training and evaluation, we introduce AgenticIQA-200K, a large-scale instruction dataset tailored for IQA agents, and AgenticIQA-Eval, the first benchmark for assessing the planning, execution, and summarization capabilities of VLM-based IQA agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T09:37:01Z)
• Benchmarking LLM-based Agents for Single-cell Omics Analysis [6.915378212190715]
  AI agents offer a paradigm shift, enabling adaptive planning, executable code generation, traceable decisions, and real-time knowledge fusion.<n>We introduce a novel benchmarking evaluation system to rigorously assess agent capabilities in single-cell omics analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-16T04:26:18Z)
• Understanding Software Engineering Agents: A Study of Thought-Action-Result Trajectories [17.975121612118752]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly employed to automate complex software engineering tasks.<n>We present a large-scale empirical study of the thought-action-result trajectories of three state-of-the-art LLM-based agents.<n>We identify key trajectory characteristics, such as counts and token consumption, recurring action sequences, and the semantic coherence of thoughts, actions, and their results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T16:34:52Z)
• Investigating the Role of Instruction Variety and Task Difficulty in Robotic Manipulation Tasks [50.75902473813379]
  This work introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework that systematically examines the role of instructions and inputs in the generalisation abilities of such models. The proposed framework uncovers the resilience of multimodal models to extreme instruction perturbations and their vulnerability to observational changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T14:36:49Z)
• Learning Causal Models of Autonomous Agents using Interventions [11.351235628684252]
  We extend the analysis of an agent assessment module that lets an AI system execute high-level instruction sequences in simulators. We show that such a primitive query-response capability is sufficient to efficiently derive a user-interpretable causal model of the system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-21T21:33:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.