Improving Generalization on Cybersecurity Tasks with Multi-Modal Contrastive Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20181v1
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 17:57:00 GMT
- Title: Improving Generalization on Cybersecurity Tasks with Multi-Modal Contrastive Learning
- Abstract summary: We investigate contrastive multi-modal learning as a first step towards improving ML performance in cybersecurity tasks.<n>We propose a two-stage multi-modal contrastive learning framework that uses textual vulnerability descriptions to guide payload classification.<n>We evaluate the approach on a large-scale private dataset and a synthetic benchmark built from public CVE descriptions and LLM-generated payloads.
- Score: 4.010782812385566
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The use of ML in cybersecurity has long been impaired by generalization issues: Models that work well in controlled scenarios fail to maintain performance in production. The root cause often lies in ML algorithms learning superficial patterns (shortcuts) rather than underlying cybersecurity concepts. We investigate contrastive multi-modal learning as a first step towards improving ML performance in cybersecurity tasks. We aim at transferring knowledge from data-rich modalities, such as text, to data-scarce modalities, such as payloads. We set up a case study on threat classification and propose a two-stage multi-modal contrastive learning framework that uses textual vulnerability descriptions to guide payload classification. First, we construct a semantically meaningful embedding space using contrastive learning on descriptions. Then, we align payloads to this space, transferring knowledge from text to payloads. We evaluate the approach on a large-scale private dataset and a synthetic benchmark built from public CVE descriptions and LLM-generated payloads. The methodology appears to reduce shortcut learning over baselines on both benchmarks. We release our synthetic benchmark and source code as open source.
Related papers
- Key-Augmented Neural Triggers for Knowledge Sharing [3.8718804267599416]
Key-Augmented Neural Triggers embeds knowledge anchors into both training and inference.<n>It reduces fragmentation and grounding inference in localized context.<n>It is well-suited for scalable, low-latency, on-premise deployments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-05T11:40:56Z) - CAAD: Context-Aware Adaptive Decoding for Truthful Text Generation [31.469511576774252]
We propose a context-aware adaptive decoding method for large language models.<n>Our approach achieves a 2.8 percent average improvement on TruthfulQA.<n>Our model-agnostic, scalable, and efficient method requires only a single generation pass.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-04T08:28:25Z) - Con Instruction: Universal Jailbreaking of Multimodal Large Language Models via Non-Textual Modalities [76.9327488986162]
Existing attacks against multimodal language models (MLLMs) primarily communicate instructions through text accompanied by adversarial images.<n>We exploit the capabilities of MLLMs to interpret non-textual instructions, specifically, adversarial images or audio generated by our novel method, Con Instruction.<n>Our method achieves the highest attack success rates, reaching 81.3% and 86.6% on LLaVA-v1.5 (13B)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-31T13:11:14Z) - Unlearning Sensitive Information in Multimodal LLMs: Benchmark and Attack-Defense Evaluation [88.78166077081912]
We introduce a multimodal unlearning benchmark, UnLOK-VQA, and an attack-and-defense framework to evaluate methods for deleting specific multimodal knowledge from MLLMs.<n>Our results show multimodal attacks outperform text- or image-only ones, and that the most effective defense removes answer information from internal model states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-01T01:54:00Z) - Post-Incorporating Code Structural Knowledge into Pretrained Models via ICL for Code Translation [15.73070332657629]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant advancements in software mining.<n> handling the syntactic structure of source code remains a challenge.<n>This paper employs incontext learning (ICL) to integrate code structural knowledge into pre-trained LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-28T10:59:42Z) - How Robust Are Router-LLMs? Analysis of the Fragility of LLM Routing Capabilities [62.474732677086855]
Large language model (LLM) routing has emerged as a crucial strategy for balancing computational costs with performance.<n>We propose the DSC benchmark: Diverse, Simple, and Categorized, an evaluation framework that categorizes router performance across a broad spectrum of query types.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-20T19:52:30Z) - Enhancing Input-Label Mapping in In-Context Learning with Contrastive Decoding [71.01099784480597]
Large language models (LLMs) excel at a range of tasks through in-context learning (ICL)<n>We introduce In-Context Contrastive Decoding (ICCD), a novel method that emphasizes input-label mapping.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-19T14:04:46Z) - Soft Prompting for Unlearning in Large Language Models [11.504012974208466]
This work focuses on investigating machine unlearning for Large Language Models motivated by data protection regulations.
We propose a framework textbfSoft textbfPrompting for textbfUntextbflearning (SPUL)
We conduct a rigorous evaluation of the proposed method and our results indicate that SPUL can significantly improve the trade-off between utility and forgetting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T19:11:40Z) - Security Vulnerability Detection with Multitask Self-Instructed Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models [8.167614500821223]
We introduce MSIVD, multitask self-instructed fine-tuning for vulnerability detection, inspired by chain-of-thought prompting and LLM self-instruction.
Our experiments demonstrate that MSIVD achieves superior performance, outperforming the highest LLM-based vulnerability detector baseline (LineVul) with a F1 score of 0.92 on the BigVul dataset, and 0.48 on the PreciseBugs dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-09T19:18:05Z) - Enhancing Contextual Understanding in Large Language Models through Contrastive Decoding [9.2433070542025]
Large language models (LLMs) tend to inadequately integrate input context during text generation.
We introduce a novel approach integrating contrastive decoding with adversarial irrelevant passages as negative samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-04T20:38:41Z) - In-context Autoencoder for Context Compression in a Large Language Model [70.7621953091318]
We propose the In-context Autoencoder (ICAE) to compress a long context into short compact memory slots.
ICAE is first pretrained using both autoencoding and language modeling objectives on massive text data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-13T17:59:21Z) - Towards Accurate Knowledge Transfer via Target-awareness Representation
Disentanglement [56.40587594647692]
We propose a novel transfer learning algorithm, introducing the idea of Target-awareness REpresentation Disentanglement (TRED)
TRED disentangles the relevant knowledge with respect to the target task from the original source model and used as a regularizer during fine-tuning the target model.
Experiments on various real world datasets show that our method stably improves the standard fine-tuning by more than 2% in average.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-16T17:45:08Z) - Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representations [171.3046900127166]
Prototypical Contrastive Learning (PCL) is an unsupervised representation learning method.
PCL implicitly encodes semantic structures of the data into the learned embedding space.
PCL outperforms state-of-the-art instance-wise contrastive learning methods on multiple benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-11T09:53:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.