Left Behind: Cross-Lingual Transfer as a Bridge for Low-Resource Languages in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21036v1
• Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 03:27:47 GMT
• Title: Left Behind: Cross-Lingual Transfer as a Bridge for Low-Resource Languages in Large Language Models
• Abstract summary: We benchmark large language models on accuracy, fluency, and completeness in English, Kazakh, and Mongolian.<n>We find a consistent performance gap of 13.8-16.7 percentage points between English and low-resource language conditions.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We investigate how large language models perform on low-resource languages by benchmarking eight LLMs across five experimental conditions in English, Kazakh, and Mongolian. Using 50 hand-crafted questions spanning factual, reasoning, technical, and culturally grounded categories, we evaluate 2,000 responses on accuracy, fluency, and completeness. We find a consistent performance gap of 13.8-16.7 percentage points between English and low-resource language conditions, with models maintaining surface-level fluency while producing significantly less accurate content. Cross-lingual transfer-prompting models to reason in English before translating back-yields selective gains for bilingual architectures (+2.2pp to +4.3pp) but provides no benefit to English-dominant models. Our results demonstrate that current LLMs systematically underserve low-resource language communities, and that effective mitigation strategies are architecture-dependent rather than universal.

Related papers

• Winning with Less for Low Resource Languages: Advantage of Cross-Lingual English_Persian Argument Mining Model over LLM Augmentation [0.12744523252873352]
  This paper aims at utilizing a cross-lingual approach to argument mining for low-resource languages.<n>We examine the models on English, as a high-resource language, and Persian, as a low-resource language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T21:36:39Z)
• Evaluating Modern Large Language Models on Low-Resource and Morphologically Rich Languages:A Cross-Lingual Benchmark Across Cantonese, Japanese, and Turkish [12.286855282078305]
  GPT-4o, GPT-4, Claude3.5Sonnet, LLaMA3.1, MistralLarge2, LLaMA-2Chat13B, and Mistral7BInstruct are evaluated.<n>Our benchmark spans four diverse tasks: open-domain question answering, document summarization, English-to-X translation, and culturally grounded dialogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T22:09:53Z)
• Towards Inclusive NLP: Assessing Compressed Multilingual Transformers across Diverse Language Benchmarks [33.2185998586144]
  This study benchmarks the performance of multilingual and monolingual Large Language Models (LLMs) across Arabic, English, and Indic languages.<n>Findings show significant performance differences driven by linguistic diversity and resource availability.<n> Quantization (4-bit and 8-bit) is effective in maintaining model accuracy while promoting efficiency, but aggressive pruning significantly compromises performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T22:35:10Z)
• MuBench: Assessment of Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models Across 61 Languages [33.450081592217074]
  We introduce MuBench, a benchmark covering 61 languages and evaluating a broad range of capabilities.<n>We evaluate several state-of-the-art multilingual LLMs and find notable gaps between claimed and actual language coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-24T09:53:00Z)
• Cross-Lingual Pitfalls: Automatic Probing Cross-Lingual Weakness of Multilingual Large Language Models [55.14276067678253]
  This paper introduces a novel methodology for efficiently identifying inherent cross-lingual weaknesses in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We construct a new dataset of over 6,000 bilingual pairs across 16 languages using this methodology, demonstrating its effectiveness in revealing weaknesses even in state-of-the-art models.<n>Further experiments investigate the relationship between linguistic similarity and cross-lingual weaknesses, revealing that linguistically related languages share similar performance patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T12:31:27Z)
• SLAM: Towards Efficient Multilingual Reasoning via Selective Language Alignment [78.4550589538805]
  We propose an efficient multilingual reasoning alignment approach that precisely identifies and fine-tunes the layers responsible for handling multilingualism.<n> Experimental results show that our method, SLAM, only tunes 6 layers' feed-forward sub-layers including 6.5-8% of all parameters within 7B and 13B LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T10:29:43Z)
• Exploring Multilingual Probing in Large Language Models: A Cross-Language Analysis [20.79017989484242]
  Probing techniques for large language models (LLMs) have primarily focused on English, overlooking the vast majority of the world's languages.<n>We conduct experiments on several open-source LLM models, analyzing probing accuracy, trends across layers, and similarities between probing vectors for multiple languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-22T14:14:05Z)
• The Power of Question Translation Training in Multilingual Reasoning: Broadened Scope and Deepened Insights [108.40766216456413]
  We propose a question alignment framework to bridge the gap between large language models' English and non-English performance. Experiment results show it can boost multilingual performance across diverse reasoning scenarios, model families, and sizes. We analyze representation space, generated response and data scales, and reveal how question translation training strengthens language alignment within LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T14:49:50Z)
• Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Reranking with Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languages [51.301942056881146]
  We investigate how large language models (LLMs) function as rerankers in cross-lingual information retrieval systems for African languages. Our implementation covers English and four African languages (Hausa, Somali, Swahili, and Yoruba) We examine cross-lingual reranking with queries in English and passages in the African languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T18:38:54Z)
• Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars. We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English. Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
• Harnessing Multilinguality in Unsupervised Machine Translation for Rare Languages [48.28540903568198]
  We show that multilinguality is critical to making unsupervised systems practical for low-resource settings. We present a single model for 5 low-resource languages (Gujarati, Kazakh, Nepali, Sinhala, and Turkish) to and from English directions. We outperform all current state-of-the-art unsupervised baselines for these languages, achieving gains of up to 14.4 BLEU.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-23T15:07:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.