First-Mover Bias in Gradient Boosting Explanations: Mechanism, Detection, and Resolution
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22346v1
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2026 02:59:40 GMT
- Title: First-Mover Bias in Gradient Boosting Explanations: Mechanism, Detection, and Resolution
- Abstract summary: First-mover bias is a concentration of feature importance caused by sequential residual fitting in gradient boosting.<n>We show that model independence is sufficient to resolve first-mover bias in the linear regime, and remains the most effective mitigation under nonlinear data-generating processes.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We isolate and empirically characterize first-mover bias -- a path-dependent concentration of feature importance caused by sequential residual fitting in gradient boosting -- as a specific mechanistic cause of the well-known instability of SHAP-based feature rankings under multicollinearity. When correlated features compete for early splits, gradient boosting creates a self-reinforcing advantage for whichever feature is selected first: subsequent trees inherit modified residuals that favor the incumbent, concentrating SHAP importance on an arbitrary feature rather than distributing it across the correlated group. Scaling up a single model amplifies this effect -- a Large Single Model with the same total tree count as our method produces the worst explanations of any approach tested. We demonstrate that model independence is sufficient to resolve first-mover bias in the linear regime, and remains the most effective mitigation under nonlinear data-generating processes. Both our proposed method, DASH (Diversified Aggregation of SHAP), and simple seed-averaging (Stochastic Retrain) restore stability by breaking the sequential dependency chain, confirming that the operative mechanism is independence between explained models. At rho=0.9, both achieve stability=0.977, while the single-best workflow degrades to 0.958 and the Large Single Model to 0.938. On the Breast Cancer dataset, DASH improves stability from 0.32 to 0.93 (+0.61) against a tree-count-matched baseline. DASH additionally provides two diagnostic tools -- the Feature Stability Index (FSI) and Importance-Stability (IS) Plot -- that detect first-mover bias without ground truth, enabling practitioners to audit explanation reliability before acting on feature rankings. Software and reproducible benchmarks are available at https://github.com/DrakeCaraker/dash-shap.
Related papers
- Multi-Source Complex Network Reconstruction via Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization and Algorithm Unrolling [9.526111877241602]
We propose MS-WDRO, a graph learning framework that fuses heterogeneous sources via their weighted Wasserstein barycenter.<n>Minimizing worst-case risk yields a tractable regularized Laplacian estimator solved efficiently via a provably convergent ADMM scheme.<n>MS-WDRO consistently outperforms seven baselines in graph recovery, sample efficiency, and downstream diagnostic utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-20T11:30:59Z) - Link Prediction or Perdition: the Seeds of Instability in Knowledge Graph Embeddings [2.1174215880331766]
Embedding models (KGEMs) constitute the main link prediction approach to complete knowledge graphs.<n>Standard evaluation protocols emphasize rank-based metrics such as MRR or Hits@$K$, but usually overlook the influence of random seeds on result stability.<n>We find that high-performance models actually produce divergent predictions at the triple level and highly variable spaces.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-02T09:13:50Z) - Joint Model and Data Sparsification via the Marginal Likelihood [53.29070892356214]
We propose jointly learning individual feature and sample relevancies, enabling simultaneous model and data sparsification.<n>This symmetric pruning of model and data offers a natural extension that preserves conjugacy.<n> Empirical results across diverse regression tasks affirm that a joint ARD approach consistently yields both sparse and robust prediction models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-28T13:26:53Z) - Clipping Bottleneck: Stabilizing RLVR via Stochastic Recovery of Near-Boundary Signals [83.0127582612634]
Near-boundary Rescue (NSR) is a minimal, plug-and-play modification that retains out-of-bound tokens to recover lost signals.<n>NSR substantially improves training stability and delivers consistent gains over strong baselines such as DAPO and GSPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-21T16:45:31Z) - Multimodal Learning on Low-Quality Data with Conformal Predictive Self-Calibration [72.0672328514289]
Multimodal learning often grapples with the challenge of low-quality data.<n>We propose a unified framework, termed Conformal Predictive Self-Calibration.<n>Our framework consistently outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-05T14:48:52Z) - Improving Search Agent with One Line of Code [68.58667107354253]
Tool-based Agentic Reinforcement Learning (TARL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training search agents to interact with external tools.<n>We propose textbfSearch textbfAgent textbfPolicy textbfOptimization (textbfSAPO), which stabilizes training via a conditional token-level KL constraint.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-10T04:07:39Z) - Observationally Informed Adaptive Causal Experimental Design [55.998153710215654]
We propose Active Residual Learning, a new paradigm that leverages the observational model as a foundational prior.<n>This approach shifts the experimental focus from learning target causal quantities from scratch to efficiently estimating the residuals required to correct observational bias.<n> Experiments on synthetic and semi-synthetic benchmarks demonstrate that R-Design significantly outperforms baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-04T06:52:37Z) - Function-Space Decoupled Diffusion for Forward and Inverse Modeling in Carbon Capture and Storage [65.51149575007149]
We present Fun-DDPS, a generative framework that combines function-space diffusion models with differentiable neural operator surrogates for both forward and inverse modeling.<n>Fun-DDPS produces physically consistent realizations free from the high-frequency artifacts observed in joint-state baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T18:58:12Z) - Representation-Aware Unlearning via Activation Signatures: From Suppression to Knowledge-Signature Erasure [2.0017902634527194]
We introduce Knowledge Immunization Framework (KIF), a representation-aware architecture that distinguishes genuine erasure from obfuscation.<n>Our approach combines dynamic suppression of subject-specific representations with parameter-efficient adaptation, enabling durable unlearning without full model retraining.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-15T16:28:14Z) - Decoupling the Effect of Chain-of-Thought Reasoning: A Human Label Variation Perspective [60.45433515408158]
We show that long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) serves as a decisive decision-maker for the top option but fails to function as a granular distribution calibrator for ambiguous tasks.<n>We observe a distinct "decoupled mechanism": while CoT improves distributional alignment, final accuracy is dictated by CoT content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T16:26:40Z) - MaP: A Unified Framework for Reliable Evaluation of Pre-training Dynamics [72.00014675808228]
Instability in Large Language Models evaluation process obscures true learning dynamics.<n>We introduce textbfMaP, a framework that integrates underlineMerging underlineand the underlinePass@k metric.<n>Experiments show that MaP yields significantly smoother performance curves, reduces inter-run variance, and ensures more consistent rankings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-10T11:40:27Z) - ResAD: Normalized Residual Trajectory Modeling for End-to-End Autonomous Driving [64.42138266293202]
ResAD is a Normalized Residual Trajectory Modeling framework.<n>It reframes the learning task to predict the residual deviation from an inertial reference.<n>On the NAVSIM benchmark, ResAD achieves a state-of-the-art PDMS of 88.6 using a vanilla diffusion policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T17:59:36Z) - ResAD++: Towards Class Agnostic Anomaly Detection via Residual Feature Learning [52.11294707895649]
This paper explores the problem of class-agnostic anomaly detection (AD)<n>The objective is to train one class-agnostic AD model that can generalize to detect anomalies in diverse new classes from different domains without any retraining or fine-tuning on the target data.<n> Comprehensive experiments on eight real-world AD datasets demonstrate that our ResAD++ can achieve remarkable AD results when directly used in new classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-28T08:41:05Z) - Controllable Feature Whitening for Hyperparameter-Free Bias Mitigation [26.926297904648393]
Deep neural networks are susceptible to learn spurious correlations present in datasets.<n>We quantify the linear correlation between the target and bias features by the covariance matrix, and eliminate it through the whitening module.<n>We show that our method outperforms existing approaches on four benchmark datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-27T14:01:30Z) - Doubly robust inference via calibration [0.9694940903078658]
We show that calibrating the nuisance estimators within a doubly robust procedure yields doubly robust normality for linear functionals.<n>Our theoretical analysis shows that the DML estimator remains calibratedally normal if either the regression or the Riesz representer of the functional is estimated sufficiently well.<n>Our method can be integrated into existing DML pipelines by adding just a few lines of code to calibrate cross-fitted estimates via isotonic regression.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-05T03:32:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.