Model Context Protocol Threat Modeling and Analyzing Vulnerabilities to Prompt Injection with Tool Poisoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22489v1
• Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 18:59:04 GMT
• Title: Model Context Protocol Threat Modeling and Analyzing Vulnerabilities to Prompt Injection with Tool Poisoning
• Abstract summary: The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has rapidly emerged as a universal standard for connecting AI assistants to external tools and data sources.<n>While MCP simplifies integration between AI applications and various services, it introduces significant security vulnerabilities, particularly on the client side.<n>We conduct threat modelings of MCP implementations using STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and DREAD (Damage, Reproducibility, Exploitability, Affected Users, Discoverability) frameworks.
• Score: 3.010338494398494
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has rapidly emerged as a universal standard for connecting AI assistants to external tools and data sources. While MCP simplifies integration between AI applications and various services, it introduces significant security vulnerabilities, particularly on the client side. In this work we conduct threat modelings of MCP implementations using STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and DREAD (Damage, Reproducibility, Exploitability, Affected Users, Discoverability) frameworks across five key components: (1) MCP Host and Client, (2) LLM, (3) MCP Server, (4) External Data Stores, and (5) Authorization Server. This comprehensive analysis reveals tool poisoning-where malicious instructions are embedded in tool metadata-as the most prevalent and impactful client-side vulnerability. We therefore focus our empirical evaluation on this critical attack vector, providing a systematic comparison of how seven major MCP clients validate and defend against tool poisoning attacks. Our analysis reveals significant security issues with most tested clients due to insufficient static validation and parameter visibility. We propose a multi-layered defense strategy encompassing static metadata analysis, model decision path tracking, behavioral anomaly detection, and user transparency mechanisms. This research addresses a critical gap in MCP security, which has primarily focused on server-side vulnerabilities, and provides actionable recommendations and mitigation strategies for securing AI agent ecosystems.

Related papers

• ShieldNet: Network-Level Guardrails against Emerging Supply-Chain Injections in Agentic Systems [56.613157564882925]
  Malicious behaviors are embedded in seemingly benign tools, silently hijacking agent execution, leaking sensitive data, or triggering unauthorized actions.<n>Despite their growing impact, there is currently no comprehensive benchmark for evaluating such threats.<n>We propose ShieldNet, a network-level guardrail framework that detects supply-chain poisoning by observing real network interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-06T05:15:00Z)
• OMNI-LEAK: Orchestrator Multi-Agent Network Induced Data Leakage [59.3826294523924]
  We investigate the security vulnerabilities of a popular multi-agent pattern known as the orchestrator setup.<n>We report the susceptibility of frontier models to different categories of attacks, finding that both reasoning and non-reasoning models are vulnerable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T21:32:32Z)
• CHASE: LLM Agents for Dissecting Malicious PyPI Packages [2.384873896423002]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) offer promising capabilities for automated code analysis.<n>Their application to security-critical malware detection faces fundamental challenges, including hallucination and context confusion.<n>We present CHASE, a high-reliability multi-agent architecture that addresses these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T10:06:14Z)
• An Empirical Study on the Security Vulnerabilities of GPTs [48.12756684275687]
  GPTs are one kind of customized AI agents based on OpenAI's large language models.<n>We present an empirical study on the security vulnerabilities of GPTs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T13:30:25Z)
• MCPGuard : Automatically Detecting Vulnerabilities in MCP Servers [16.620755774987774]
  The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as a standardized interface enabling seamless integration between Large Language Models (LLMs) and external data sources and tools.<n>This paper systematically analyzes the security landscape of MCP-based systems, identifying three principal threat categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T05:12:51Z)
• A Systematic Survey of Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives [65.3369988566853]
  Recent studies have demonstrated that adversaries can replicate a target model's functionality.<n>Model Extraction Attacks pose threats to intellectual property, privacy, and system security.<n>We propose a novel taxonomy that classifies MEAs according to attack mechanisms, defense approaches, and computing environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T19:49:59Z)
• Systematic Analysis of MCP Security [13.801464032236481]
  The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as a universal standard that enables AI agents to seamlessly connect with external tools.<n> MCP introduces significant vulnerabilities, such as Tool Poisoning Attacks (TPA), where hidden malicious instructions exploit the sycophancy of large language models.<n>We present the MCP Attack Library (MCPLIB), which categorizes and implements 31 distinct attack methods under four key classifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T00:23:41Z)
• MCPSecBench: A Systematic Security Benchmark and Playground for Testing Model Context Protocols [7.10162765778832]
  We present the first systematic taxonomy of MCP security, identifying 17 attack types across 4 primary attack surfaces.<n>We introduce MCPSecBench, a comprehensive security benchmark and playground that integrates prompt datasets, MCP servers, MCP clients, attack scripts, and protection mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-17T11:49:16Z)
• OpenAgentSafety: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Real-World AI Agent Safety [58.201189860217724]
  We introduce OpenAgentSafety, a comprehensive framework for evaluating agent behavior across eight critical risk categories.<n>Unlike prior work, our framework evaluates agents that interact with real tools, including web browsers, code execution environments, file systems, bash shells, and messaging platforms.<n>It combines rule-based analysis with LLM-as-judge assessments to detect both overt and subtle unsafe behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T16:18:54Z)
• MCIP: Protecting MCP Safety via Model Contextual Integrity Protocol [47.98229326363512]
  This paper proposes a novel framework to enhance Model Context Protocol safety.<n>Based on the MAESTRO framework, we first analyze the missing safety mechanisms in MCP.<n>Next, we develop a fine-grained taxonomy that captures a diverse range of unsafe behaviors observed in MCP scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T16:41:45Z)
• MCP Guardian: A Security-First Layer for Safeguarding MCP-Based AI System [0.0]
  We present MCP Guardian, a framework that strengthens MCP-based communication with authentication, rate-limiting, logging, tracing, and Web Application Firewall (WAF) scanning.<n>Our approach fosters secure, scalable data access for AI assistants, underscoring the importance of a defense-in-depth approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T08:49:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.