Fast and Faithful: Real-Time Verification for Long-Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23508v1
• Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2026 12:53:21 GMT
• Title: Fast and Faithful: Real-Time Verification for Long-Document Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
• Abstract summary: We present the design of a real-time verification component integrated into a production RAG pipeline.<n>The system processes documents up to 32K tokens and employs adaptive inference strategies to balance response time and verification coverage.
• Score: 9.927850680621038
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is increasingly deployed in enterprise search and document-centric assistants, where responses must be grounded in long and complex source materials. In practice, verifying that generated answers faithfully reflect retrieved documents is difficult: large language models can check long contexts but are too slow and costly for interactive services, while lightweight classifiers operate within strict context limits and frequently miss evidence outside truncated passages. We present the design of a real-time verification component integrated into a production RAG pipeline that enables full-document grounding under latency constraints. The system processes documents up to 32K tokens and employs adaptive inference strategies to balance response time and verification coverage across workloads. We describe the architectural decisions, operational trade-offs, and evaluation methodology used to deploy the verifier, and show that full-context verification substantially improves detection of unsupported responses compared with truncated validation. Our experience highlights when long-context verification is necessary, why chunk-based checking often fails in real documents, and how latency budgets shape model design. These findings provide practical guidance for practitioners building reliable large-scale retrieval-augmented applications. (Model, benchmark, and code: https://huggingface.co/llm-semantic-router)

Related papers

• RepoReasoner: Evaluating Repository-Level Code Reasoning Ability of Long-Context Language Models [54.53236295237077]
  We introduce RepoReasoner, a benchmark for evaluating repository-level code reasoning.<n> Output Prediction measures fine-grained, stateful execution reasoning across files.<n>Call Chain Prediction evaluates high-level architectural dependency understanding under noisy context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-28T17:12:41Z)
• DocSync: Agentic Documentation Maintenance via Critic-Guided Reflexion [0.0]
  DocSync is an agentic workflow that frames documentation maintenance as a structurally grounded, iterative generation task.<n>We empirically evaluate a resource-constrained implementation of DocSync-using a LoRA-adapted small language model.<n>Our findings demonstrate that this AST-aware agentic approach substantially outperforms standard encoder-decoder baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-04T02:41:33Z)
• DocSeeker: Structured Visual Reasoning with Evidence Grounding for Long Document Understanding [63.257540233507626]
  We propose a paradigm that requires the model to execute a structured Analysis, Localization and Reasoning workflow.<n>We show it robustly generalizes from short-page training to ultra-long documents and is naturally synergistic with visual Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-14T14:39:26Z)
• FS-Researcher: Test-Time Scaling for Long-Horizon Research Tasks with File-System-Based Agents [53.03492387564392]
  We introduce FS-Researcher, a file-system-based framework that scales deep research beyond the context window via a persistent workspace.<n>A Context Builder agent browses the internet, writes structured notes, and archives raw sources into a hierarchical knowledge base that can grow far beyond context length.<n>A Report Writer agent then composes the final report section by section, treating the knowledge base as the source of facts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T03:00:19Z)
• Resolving Evidence Sparsity: Agentic Context Engineering for Long-Document Understanding [49.26132236798123]
  Vision Language Models (VLMs) have gradually become a primary approach in document understanding.<n>We propose SLEUTH, a multi agent framework that orchestrates a retriever and four collaborative agents in a coarse to fine process.<n>The framework identifies key textual and visual clues within the retrieved pages, filters for salient visual evidence such as tables and charts, and analyzes the query to devise a reasoning strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-28T03:09:40Z)
• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• Benchmarking Deep Search over Heterogeneous Enterprise Data [73.55304268238474]
  We present a new benchmark for evaluating a form of retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>RAG requires source-aware, multi-hop reasoning over diverse, sparsed, but related sources.<n>We build it using a synthetic data pipeline that simulates business across product planning, development, and support stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-29T08:34:59Z)
• Hierarchical Document Refinement for Long-context Retrieval-augmented Generation [28.421675216147374]
  LongRefiner is an efficient plug-and-play refiner that leverages the inherent structural characteristics of long documents.<n>LongRefiner achieves competitive performance in various scenarios while using 10x fewer computational costs and latency compared to the best baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T15:34:15Z)
• Cognitive-Aligned Document Selection for Retrieval-augmented Generation [2.9060210098040855]
  We propose GGatrieval to dynamically update queries and filter high-quality, reliable retrieval documents.<n>We parse the user query into its syntactic components and perform fine-grained grounded alignment with the retrieved documents.<n>Our approach introduces a novel criterion for filtering retrieved documents, closely emulating human strategies for acquiring targeted information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T13:00:15Z)
• Don't Do RAG: When Cache-Augmented Generation is All You Need for Knowledge Tasks [11.053340674721005]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has gained traction as a powerful approach for enhancing language models by integrating external knowledge sources.<n>This paper proposes an alternative paradigm, cache-augmented generation (CAG) that bypasses real-time retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T06:58:32Z)
• Leave No Document Behind: Benchmarking Long-Context LLMs with Extended Multi-Doc QA [71.04146366608904]
  Long-context modeling capabilities have garnered widespread attention, leading to the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) with ultra-context windows. We propose a novel long-context benchmark, Loong, aligning with realistic scenarios through extended multi-document question answering (QA) Loong introduces four types of tasks with a range of context lengths: Spotlight Locating, Comparison, Clustering, and Chain of Reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T09:42:56Z)
• Grounding Language Model with Chunking-Free In-Context Retrieval [27.316315081648572]
  This paper presents a novel Chunking-Free In-Context (CFIC) retrieval approach, specifically tailored for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T07:22:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.