Safe Reinforcement Learning with Preference-based Constraint Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23565v1
• Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 08:54:03 GMT
• Title: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Preference-based Constraint Inference
• Abstract summary: We propose Preference-based Constrained Reinforcement Learning (PbCRL) for constraint inference in Safe RL.<n>PbCRL achieves superior alignment with true safety requirements and outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines in terms of safety and reward.
• Score: 28.363990267209584
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Safe reinforcement learning (RL) is a standard paradigm for safety-critical decision making. However, real-world safety constraints can be complex, subjective, and even hard to explicitly specify. Existing works on constraint inference rely on restrictive assumptions or extensive expert demonstrations, which is not realistic in many real-world applications. How to cheaply and reliably learn these constraints is the major challenge we focus on in this study. While inferring constraints from human preferences offers a data-efficient alternative, we identify the popular Bradley-Terry (BT) models fail to capture the asymmetric, heavy-tailed nature of safety costs, resulting in risk underestimation. It is still rare in the literature to understand the impacts of BT models on the downstream policy learning. To address the above knowledge gaps, we propose a novel approach namely Preference-based Constrained Reinforcement Learning (PbCRL). We introduce a novel dead zone mechanism into preference modeling and theoretically prove that it encourages heavy-tailed cost distributions, thereby achieving better constraint alignment. Additionally, we incorporate a Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) loss to encourage exploration by cost variances, which is found to benefit policy learning. Further, two-stage training strategy are deployed to lower online labeling burdens while adaptively enhancing constraint satisfaction. Empirical results demonstrate that PbCRL achieves superior alignment with true safety requirements and outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines in terms of safety and reward. Our work explores a promising and effective way for constraint inference in Safe RL, which has great potential in a range of safety-critical applications.

Related papers

• BarrierSteer: LLM Safety via Learning Barrier Steering [83.12893815611052]
  BarrierSteer is a novel framework that formalizes safety by embedding learned non-linear safety constraints directly into the model's latent representation space.<n>We show that BarrierSteer substantially reduces adversarial success rates, decreases unsafe generations, and outperforms existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T18:19:46Z)
• Vulnerability Analysis of Safe Reinforcement Learning via Inverse Constrained Reinforcement Learning [1.4707788677208018]
  We propose an adversarial attack framework to reveal vulnerabilities of Safe RL policies.<n>Our framework learns a constraint model and a surrogate (learner) policy, enabling gradient-based attack optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T15:43:36Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning via Recovery-based Shielding with Gaussian Process Dynamics Models [57.006252510102506]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful framework for optimal decision-making and control but often lacks provable guarantees for safety-critical applications.<n>We introduce a novel recovery-based shielding framework that enables safe RL with a provable safety lower bound for unknown and non-linear continuous dynamical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T22:03:35Z)
• Towards Sample-Efficient and Stable Reinforcement Learning for LLM-based Recommendation [56.92367609590823]
  Long Chain-of-Thought (Long CoT) reasoning has shown promise in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We argue that Long CoT is inherently ill-suited for the sequential recommendation domain.<n>We propose RISER, a novel Reinforced Item Space Exploration framework for Recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-31T10:02:43Z)
• Anchoring Refusal Direction: Mitigating Safety Risks in Tuning via Projection Constraint [52.878820730054365]
  Instruction Fine-Tuning (IFT) has been widely adopted as an effective post-training strategy to enhance abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Recent research into the internal mechanisms of LLMs has identified the refusal direction (r-direction) in the hidden states, which plays a pivotal role in governing refusal behavior.<n>To mitigate such drift, our proposed ProCon method introduces a projection-constrained loss term that regularizes the projection magnitude of each training sample's hidden state onto the r-direction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T15:24:33Z)
• Viability of Future Actions: Robust Safety in Reinforcement Learning via Entropy Regularization [47.30677525394649]
  We analyze the interplay between two well-established techniques in model-free reinforcement learning: entropy regularization and constraints penalization.<n>We show that entropy regularization in constrained RL inherently biases learning toward maximizing the number of future viable actions, thereby promoting constraints satisfaction robust to action noise.<n>We conclude that the connection between entropy regularization and robustness is a promising avenue for further empirical and theoretical investigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T16:34:19Z)
• Latent Safety-Constrained Policy Approach for Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning [7.888219789657414]
  In safe offline reinforcement learning (RL), the objective is to develop a policy that maximizes cumulative rewards while strictly adhering to safety constraints.<n>We address these issues with a novel approach that begins by learning a conservatively safe policy through the use of Conditional Variational Autoencoders.<n>We frame this as a Constrained Reward-Return Maximization problem, wherein the policy aims to optimize rewards while complying with the inferred latent safety constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-11T22:00:07Z)
• Concurrent Learning of Policy and Unknown Safety Constraints in Reinforcement Learning [4.14360329494344]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has revolutionized decision-making across a wide range of domains over the past few decades. Yet, deploying RL policies in real-world scenarios presents the crucial challenge of ensuring safety. Traditional safe RL approaches have predominantly focused on incorporating predefined safety constraints into the policy learning process. We propose a novel approach that concurrently learns a safe RL control policy and identifies the unknown safety constraint parameters of a given environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T20:01:15Z)
• Safe Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with an Uncertainty-Aware Reachability Certificate [6.581362609037603]
  We build a safe reinforcement learning framework to resolve constraints required by the DRC and its corresponding shield policy. We also devise a line search method to maintain safety and reach higher returns simultaneously while leveraging the shield policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T06:16:53Z)
• Enforcing Hard Constraints with Soft Barriers: Safe Reinforcement Learning in Unknown Stochastic Environments [84.3830478851369]
  We propose a safe reinforcement learning approach that can jointly learn the environment and optimize the control policy. Our approach can effectively enforce hard safety constraints and significantly outperform CMDP-based baseline methods in system safe rate measured via simulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-29T20:49:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.