The Cognitive Firewall:Securing Browser Based AI Agents Against Indirect Prompt Injection Via Hybrid Edge Cloud Defense
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23791v1
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 23:49:15 GMT
- Title: The Cognitive Firewall:Securing Browser Based AI Agents Against Indirect Prompt Injection Via Hybrid Edge Cloud Defense
- Abstract summary: Cognitive Firewall is a three-stage split-compute architecture that distributes security checks across the client and the cloud.<n>System consists of a local visual Sentinel, a cloud-based Deep Planner, and a deterministic Guard that enforces execution-time policies.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Deploying large language models (LLMs) as autonomous browser agents exposes a significant attack surface in the form of Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI). Cloud-based defenses can provide strong semantic analysis, but they introduce latency and raise privacy concerns. We present the Cognitive Firewall, a three-stage split-compute architecture that distributes security checks across the client and the cloud. The system consists of a local visual Sentinel, a cloud-based Deep Planner, and a deterministic Guard that enforces execution-time policies. Across 1,000 adversarial samples, edge-only defenses fail to detect 86.9% of semantic attacks. In contrast, the full hybrid architecture reduces the overall attack success rate (ASR) to below 1% (0.88% under static evaluation and 0.67% under adaptive evaluation), while maintaining deterministic constraints on side-effecting actions. By filtering presentation-layer attacks locally, the system avoids unnecessary cloud inference and achieves an approximately 17,000x latency advantage over cloud-only baselines. These results indicate that deterministic enforcement at the execution boundary can complement probabilistic language models, and that split-compute provides a practical foundation for securing interactive LLM agents.
Related papers
- Who Pays the Price? Stakeholder-Centric Prompt Injection Benchmarking for Real-world Web Agents [93.19140872946842]
Web agents driven by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world environments.<n>This makes them vulnerable to prompt-injection attacks, in which seemingly benign content embeds adversarial instructions that manipulate agent behaviour.<n>We introduce textbfsysname, a benchmark to systematically categorize and attribute harm in real-world web agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-11T14:12:43Z) - Detecting and Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in OTA-FL Systems: A Two-Stage Robust Aggregation Scheme [27.75838619796163]
Over-the-air federated learning (OTA-FL) improves communication efficiency by exploiting the superposition property of wireless channels.<n>This creates a critical security vulnerability: the parameter server cannot access individual local updates.<n>We propose a two-stage robust aggregation framework for defending against backdoor attacks in OTA-FL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-19T01:57:31Z) - Parallax: Why AI Agents That Think Must Never Act [0.0]
This paper introduces Parallax, a paradigm for safe autonomous AI execution grounded in four principles.<n>We present OpenParallax, an open-source reference implementation in Go, and evaluate it usingAssume-Compromise Evaluation.<n>Across 280 adversarial test cases in nine attack categories, Parallax blocks 98.9% of attacks with zero false positives under its default configuration, and 100% of attacks under its maximum-security configuration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-14T17:20:48Z) - CaMeLs Can Use Computers Too: System-level Security for Computer Use Agents [60.98294016925157]
AI agents are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, where malicious content hijacks agent behavior to steal credentials or cause financial loss.<n>We introduce Single-Shot Planning for CUAs, where a trusted planner generates a complete execution graph with conditional branches before any observation of potentially malicious content.<n>Although this architectural isolation successfully prevents instruction injections, we show that additional measures are needed to prevent Branch Steering attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-14T23:06:35Z) - A Practical Honeypot-Based Threat Intelligence Framework for Cyber Defence in the Cloud [0.3714118205123091]
We introduce an automated defense framework that dynamically update firewall rules in real time.<n>The framework integrates deception sensors (Cowrie), Azure-native automation tools (Monitor, Sentinel, Logic Apps), and MITRE ATT&CK-aligned detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-04T23:39:25Z) - Proactive DDoS Detection and Mitigation in Decentralized Software-Defined Networking via Port-Level Monitoring and Zero-Training Large Language Models [3.6260109722491465]
Software-Defined Networking (cSDN) offers flexible and programmable control of networks but suffers from scalability and reliability issues.<n>Decentralized SDN (dSDN) Distributed alleviates these concerns by distributing control across multiple local controllers.<n>This architecture remains highly vulnerable to Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks.<n>We propose a novel detection and mitigation framework tailored for dSDN environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-01T08:57:29Z) - ZORRO: Zero-Knowledge Robustness and Privacy for Split Learning (Full Version) [58.595691399741646]
Split Learning (SL) is a distributed learning approach that enables resource-constrained clients to collaboratively train deep neural networks (DNNs)<n>This setup enables SL to leverage server capacities without sharing data, making it highly effective in resource-constrained environments dealing with sensitive data.<n>We present ZORRO, a private, verifiable, and robust SL defense scheme.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-11T18:44:09Z) - Reducing False Positives with Active Behavioral Analysis for Cloud Security [2.4631419586608225]
Rule-based cloud security posture management (CSPM) solutions are known to produce a lot of false positives.<n>This paper introduces a validation-driven methodology that integrates active behavioral testing in cloud security posture management solution(s) to evaluate the exploitability of policy violations in real time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-18T02:39:02Z) - ELBA-Bench: An Efficient Learning Backdoor Attacks Benchmark for Large Language Models [55.93380086403591]
Generative large language models are vulnerable to backdoor attacks.<n>$textitELBA-Bench$ allows attackers to inject backdoor through parameter efficient fine-tuning.<n>$textitELBA-Bench$ provides over 1300 experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-22T12:55:28Z) - Edge-Only Universal Adversarial Attacks in Distributed Learning [49.546479320670464]
In this work, we explore the feasibility of generating universal adversarial attacks when an attacker has access to the edge part of the model only.
Our approach shows that adversaries can induce effective mispredictions in the unknown cloud part by leveraging key features on the edge side.
Our results on ImageNet demonstrate strong attack transferability to the unknown cloud part.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-15T11:06:24Z) - G$^2$uardFL: Safeguarding Federated Learning Against Backdoor Attacks
through Attributed Client Graph Clustering [116.4277292854053]
Federated Learning (FL) offers collaborative model training without data sharing.
FL is vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where poisoned model weights lead to compromised system integrity.
We present G$2$uardFL, a protective framework that reinterprets the identification of malicious clients as an attributed graph clustering problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T07:15:04Z) - CrowdGuard: Federated Backdoor Detection in Federated Learning [39.58317527488534]
This paper presents a novel defense mechanism, CrowdGuard, that effectively mitigates backdoor attacks in Federated Learning.
CrowdGuard employs a server-located stacked clustering scheme to enhance its resilience to rogue client feedback.
The evaluation results demonstrate that CrowdGuard achieves a 100% True-Positive-Rate and True-Negative-Rate across various scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-14T11:27:49Z) - A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustness [105.88250594033053]
Adversarial examples can cause catastrophic mistakes in Deep Neural Network (DNNs) based vision systems.
This paper proposes a self-supervised adversarial training mechanism in the input space.
It provides significant robustness against the textbfunseen adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-08T20:42:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.