From Stateless to Situated: Building a Psychological World for LLM-Based Emotional Support
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25031v1
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 04:54:24 GMT
- Title: From Stateless to Situated: Building a Psychological World for LLM-Based Emotional Support
- Abstract summary: In psychological support and emotional companionship scenarios, the core limitation of large language models (LLMs) lies in their reliance on local next-token prediction.<n>We argue that the key challenge in process-oriented emotional support is not simply generating natural language, but constructing a sustainably updatable external situational structure for the model.
- Score: 0.594744418467423
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: In psychological support and emotional companionship scenarios, the core limitation of large language models (LLMs) lies not merely in response quality, but in their reliance on local next-token prediction, which prevents them from maintaining the temporal continuity, stage awareness, and user consent boundaries required for multi-turn intervention. This stateless characteristic makes systems prone to premature advancement, stage misalignment, and boundary violations in continuous dialogue. To address this problem, we argue that the key challenge in process-oriented emotional support is not simply generating natural language, but constructing a sustainably updatable external situational structure for the model. We therefore propose LEKIA 2.0, a situated LLM architecture that separates the cognitive layer from the executive layer, thereby decoupling situational modeling from intervention execution. This design enables the system to maintain stable representations of the user's situation and consent boundaries throughout ongoing interaction. To evaluate this process-control capability, we further introduce a Static-to-Dynamic online evaluation protocol for multi-turn interaction. LEKIA achieved an average absolute improvement of approximately 31% over prompt-only baselines in deep intervention loop completion. The results suggest that an external situational structure is a key enabling condition for building stable, controllable, and situated emotional support systems.
Related papers
- Adaptive Capitulation: A Structural Failure Mode of LLM Responses in Vulnerability Contexts [0.0]
We show that the trilemma is structural rather than incidental, and propose Minimal Reattributive Sufficiency (MRS)<n>MRS embeds a single reattributive cue within an otherwise validating response, preserving a pathway toward autonomous reattribution without contesting the user's stated goal.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-21T23:38:59Z) - Care-Conditioned Neuromodulation for Autonomy-Preserving Supportive Dialogue Agents [3.7958475517455947]
We introduce Care-Conditioned Neuromodulation (CCN), a state-dependent control framework.<n>We define a utility function that rewards autonomy support and helpfulness while penalizing dependency and coercion.<n>These results suggest that state-dependent control combined with utility-based selection is a practical approach to multi-objective alignment in autonomy-sensitive dialogue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-02T03:44:58Z) - Chain-of-Authorization: Internalizing Authorization into Large Language Models via Reasoning Trajectories [21.063230721511726]
Chain-of-Authorization (CoA) framework internalizes authorization logic into Large Language Models' core capabilities.<n>CoA integrates policy execution with task responses, making authorization a causal prerequisite for substantive responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-24T07:13:01Z) - The Silent Thought: Modeling Internal Cognition in Full-Duplex Spoken Dialogue Models via Latent Reasoning [76.96796481909581]
Internal cognitive processing is instrumental in formulating high-quality responses.<n>We propose a novel method named FLAIR that conducts latent thinking simultaneously with speech perception.<n>Our approach aligns seamlessly with spoken dialogue systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-18T15:30:29Z) - SocialOmni: Benchmarking Audio-Visual Social Interactivity in Omni Models [86.19617358080016]
Social Omni is a benchmark that operationalizes the evaluation of conversational interactivity across three core dimensions.<n>Social Omni features 2,000 perception samples and a quality-controlled diagnostic set of 209 interaction-generation instances.<n>Our analysis reveals a pronounced decoupling between a model's perceptual accuracy and its ability to generate contextually appropriate interruptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-17T17:58:44Z) - State-Dependent Safety Failures in Multi-Turn Language Model Interaction [70.52906620450847]
We study safety failures from a state-space perspective and show that many multi-turn failures arise from structured contextual state evolution.<n>We introduce STAR, a state-oriented diagnostic framework that treats dialogue history as a state transition operator.<n>We find that systems that appear robust under static evaluation can undergo rapid and reproducible safety collapse under structured multi-turn interaction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-15T12:13:01Z) - When the Loop Closes: Architectural Limits of In-Context Isolation, Metacognitive Co-option, and the Two-Target Design Problem in Human-LLM Systems [0.0]
We report a detailed autoethnographic case study of a single-subject who operated a multi-modal prompt-engineering system.<n>Within 48 hours of the system's completion, a cascade of observable behavioral changes occurred.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-14T04:06:57Z) - A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z) - The ASIR Courage Model: A Phase-Dynamic Framework for Truth Transitions in Human and AI Systems [1.4524117432184773]
ASIR Courage Model formalizes truth-disclosure as a state transition rather than a personality trait.<n>Phase-dynamic framework initially formulated for human truth-telling under asymmetric stakes.<n>Same architecture extends to AI systems operating under policy constraints and alignment filters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-25T09:56:26Z) - Controlling Long-Horizon Behavior in Language Model Agents with Explicit State Dynamics [0.0]
Large language model (LLM) agents exhibit abrupt shifts in tone and persona during extended interaction.<n>The role of explicit affective dynamics in shaping long-horizon agent behavior remains underexplored.<n>We introduce an agent-level affective subsystem that maintains a continuous Valence-Arousal-Dominance (VAD) state external to the language model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-22T16:34:05Z) - Top 10 Open Challenges Steering the Future of Diffusion Language Model and Its Variants [85.33837131101342]
We propose a strategic roadmap organized into four pillars: foundational infrastructure, algorithmic optimization, cognitive reasoning, and unified multimodal intelligence.<n>We argue that this transition is essential for developing next-generation AI capable of complex structural reasoning, dynamic self-correction, and seamless multimodal integration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-20T14:58:23Z) - The Path Ahead for Agentic AI: Challenges and Opportunities [4.52683540940001]
This chapter examines the emergence of agentic AI systems that operate autonomously in complex environments.<n>We trace the architectural progression from statistical models to transformer-based systems, identifying capabilities that enable agentic behavior.<n>Unlike existing surveys, we focus on the architectural transition from language understanding to autonomous action, emphasizing the technical gaps that must be resolved before deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-06T06:31:42Z) - Making LLMs Reliable When It Matters Most: A Five-Layer Architecture for High-Stakes Decisions [51.56484100374058]
Current large language models (LLMs) excel in verifiable domains where outputs can be checked before action but prove less reliable for high-stakes strategic decisions with uncertain outcomes.<n>This gap, driven by mutually cognitive biases in both humans and artificial intelligence (AI) systems, threatens the defensibility of valuations and sustainability of investments in the sector.<n>This report describes a framework emerging from systematic qualitative assessment across 7 frontier-grade LLMs and 3 market-facing venture vignettes under time pressure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-10T22:24:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.