Beyond Banning AI: A First Look at GenAI Governance in Open Source Software Communities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26487v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:48:46 GMT
• Title: Beyond Banning AI: A First Look at GenAI Governance in Open Source Software Communities
• Abstract summary: Generative AI (GenAI) is playing an increasingly important role in open source software (OSS)<n>We conduct a multi-stage analysis on various qualitative materials related to GenAI governance retrieved from 67 OSS projects.<n>We show that governing GenAI in OSS extends well beyond banning - it requires coordinated responses across accountability, verification, review capacity, code provenance, and platform infrastructure.
• Score: 13.02344624749338
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) is playing an increasingly important role in open source software (OSS). Beyond completing code and documentation, GenAI is increasingly involved in issues, pull requests, code reviews, and security reports. Yet, cheaper generation does not mean cheaper review - and the resulting maintenance burden has pushed OSS projects to experiment with GenAI-specific rules in contribution guidelines, security policies, and repository instructions, even including a total ban on AI-assisted contributions. However, governing GenAI in OSS is far more than a ban-or-not question. The responses remain scattered, with neither a shared governance framework in practice nor a systematic understanding in research. Therefore, in this paper, we conduct a multi-stage analysis on various qualitative materials related to GenAI governance retrieved from 67 highly visible OSS projects. Our analysis identifies recurring concerns across contribution workflows, derives three governance orientations, and maps out 12 governance strategies and their implementation patterns. We show that governing GenAI in OSS extends well beyond banning - it requires coordinated responses across accountability, verification, review capacity, code provenance, and platform infrastructure. Overall, our work distills dispersed community practices into a structured overview, providing a conceptual baseline for researchers and a practical reference for maintainers and platform designers.

Related papers

• On Automated and Explainable Provenance of AI-Generated Code [56.818202904805446]
  We argue that the next generation of CodeGenAI tools must be built on a foundation of explainable provenance.<n>We describe a research program combining large-scale empirical studies with post-hoc causal and interpretability techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T14:50:31Z)
• Quick Build, Careful Check? Generative AI Use in Hackathons [83.0493885475068]
  We report an exploratory interview study with participants at an AI-themed hackathon in central Europe.<n>We found that participants used GenAI for purposes beyond coding, including learning unfamiliar topics, brainstorming, and preparing documentation.<n>We also found that all participants converged on an unwritten practice of checking GenAI output before using it, yet their ability to actually verify was constrained by time pressure and limited domain knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-31T08:59:18Z)
• Generative AI for Software Project Management: Insights from a Review of Software Practitioner Literature [10.538929168757731]
  We performed a grey literature review using 47 publicly available practitioner sources including blogs, articles, and industry reports.<n>We found that software project managers primarily perceive GenAI as an "assistant", "copilot", or "friend" rather than as a "PM replacement"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T01:35:17Z)
• Product Manager Practices for Delegating Work to Generative AI: "Accountability must not be delegated to non-human actors" [14.99180726933919]
  Generative AI (GenAI) is changing the nature of knowledge work, particularly for Product Managers (PMs) in software development teams.<n>We conducted a mixed-methods study at Microsoft, a large, multinational software company.<n>We contribute: (1) PMs' current GenAI adoption rates, uses cases, and perceived benefits and barriers; (2) a framework capturing how PMs assess which tasks to delegate to GenAI; and (3) PMs adaptation practices for integrating GenAI into their roles and perceptions of how their role is evolving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T19:19:49Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• Charting Uncertain Waters: A Socio-Technical Framework for Navigating GenAI's Impact on Open Source Communities [53.812795099349295]
  We conduct a scenario-driven, conceptual exploration using a socio-technical framework inspired by McLuhan's Tetrad to surface both risks and opportunities for community resilience amid GenAI-driven disruption of OSS development across four domains: software practices, documentation, community engagement, and governance.<n>By adopting this lens, OSS leaders and researchers can proactively shape the future of their ecosystems, rather than simply reacting to technological upheaval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T22:54:15Z)
• Self-Admitted GenAI Usage in Open-Source Software [14.503048663131574]
  We introduce the concept of self-admitted GenAI usage, that is, developers explicitly referring to the use of GenAI tools for content creation in software artifacts.<n>We analyze a curated sample of more than 250,000 GitHub repositories, identifying 1,292 such self-admissions across 156 repositories in commit messages, code comments, and project documentation.<n>Our findings reveal that developers actively manage how GenAI is used in their projects, highlighting the need for project-level transparency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T16:05:49Z)
• Enterprise Architecture as a Dynamic Capability for Scalable and Sustainable Generative AI adoption: Bridging Innovation and Governance in Large Organisations [55.2480439325792]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence is a powerful new technology with the potential to boost innovation and reshape governance in many industries.<n>However, organisations face major challenges in scaling GenAI, including technology complexity, governance gaps and resource misalignments.<n>This study explores how Enterprise Architecture Management can meet the complex requirements of GenAI adoption within large enterprises.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T07:41:33Z)
• Approaches to Responsible Governance of GenAI in Organizations [0.09786690381850356]
  This paper draws on a literature review, established governance frameworks, and industry roundtable discussions to identify core principles for integrating responsible GenAI governance into diverse organizational structures.<n>Findings emphasize the need for adaptable risk assessment tools, continuous monitoring practices, and cross-sector collaboration to establish trustworthy GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-23T18:43:29Z)
• Securing the Future of GenAI: Policy and Technology [50.586585729683776]
  Governments globally are grappling with the challenge of regulating GenAI, balancing innovation against safety. A workshop co-organized by Google, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and Stanford University aimed to bridge this gap between GenAI policy and technology. This paper summarizes the discussions during the workshop which addressed questions, such as: How regulation can be designed without hindering technological progress?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T20:30:01Z)
• Governance of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Companies [1.2818275315985972]
  Despite extensive debates on GenAI's transformative nature and regulatory measures, limited research addresses organizational governance.<n>Our review paper fills this gap by surveying recent works with the purpose of better understanding fundamental characteristics of GenAI.<n>Our framework outlines the scope, objectives, and governance mechanisms tailored to harness business opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T14:20:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.