User Involvement in Robotic Wheelchair Development: A Decade of Limited Progress

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26543v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 15:51:48 GMT
• Title: User Involvement in Robotic Wheelchair Development: A Decade of Limited Progress
• Abstract summary: Robotic wheelchairs (RWs) offer significant potential to enhance autonomy and participation for people with mobility impairments.<n>Yet many systems have failed to achieve sustained real-world adoption.<n>This review examined the extent and quality of end-user involvement in RW design, development, and evaluation over the past decade.
• Score: 6.833969902412417
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Robotic wheelchairs (RWs) offer significant potential to enhance autonomy and participation for people with mobility impairments, yet many systems have failed to achieve sustained real-world adoption. This narrative literature review examined the extent and quality of end-user involvement in RW design, development, and evaluation over the past decade (2015--2025), assessed against core principles shared by major user-involvement approaches (e.g., user-/human-centered design, participatory/co-design, and inclusive design). The findings indicate that user involvement remains limited and is predominantly concentrated in late-stage evaluation rather than in early requirements definition or iterative co-design. Of the 399 records screened, only 23 studies (about 6%) met the inclusion criteria of verifiable end-user involvement, and many relied on small samples, often around ten participants, with limited justification for sample size selection, proxy users, laboratory-based validation, and non-standardized feedback methods. Research teams were largely engineering-dominated (about 89%) and geographically concentrated in high-income countries. Despite strong evidence that sustained user engagement improves usability and adoption in assistive technology, its systematic implementation in RW research remains rare. Advancing the field requires embedding participatory methodologies throughout the design lifecycle and addressing systemic barriers that constrain meaningful user involvement.

Related papers

• Proactive Systems in HCI and AI: Concepts, Challenges, and Opportunities [21.556641782970335]
  The last few years have seen a significant rise in interest in highly autonomous and proactive systems, fueled by advances in AI.<n>The concept of proactivity remains loosely defined and inconsistently applied across research and practice.<n>This multidisciplinary workshop aims to establish a clearer and more rigorous foundation for understanding proactive systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-23T20:30:58Z)
• Human Identification at a Distance: Challenges, Methods and Results on the Competition HID 2025 [70.29305328364755]
  The International Competition on Human Identification at a Distance (HID) has been organized annually since 2020.<n>The best-performing method reached 94.2% accuracy, setting a new benchmark on this dataset.<n>We analyze key technical trends and outline potential directions for future research in gait recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T14:22:17Z)
• Measuring Agents in Production [133.77818981073457]
  We present the first large-scale systematic study of AI agents in production.<n>We find that production agents are typically built using simple, controllable approaches.<n> Reliability remains the top development challenge, driven by difficulties in ensuring and evaluating agent correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-02T16:45:10Z)
• Personalized Reasoning: Just-In-Time Personalization and Why LLMs Fail At It [81.50711040539566]
  Current large language model (LLM) development treats task-solving and preference alignment as separate challenges.<n>We introduce PREFDISCO, an evaluation methodology that transforms static benchmarks into interactive personalization tasks.<n>Our framework creates scenarios where identical questions require different reasoning chains depending on user context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T18:55:28Z)
• Towards Personalized Deep Research: Benchmarks and Evaluations [56.581105664044436]
  We introduce Personalized Deep Research Bench, the first benchmark for evaluating personalization in Deep Research Agents (DRAs)<n>It pairs 50 diverse research tasks with 25 authentic user profiles that combine structured persona attributes with dynamic real-world contexts, yielding 250 realistic user-task queries.<n>Our experiments on a range of systems highlight current capabilities and limitations in handling personalized deep research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T17:39:17Z)
• Generating Proto-Personas through Prompt Engineering: A Case Study on Efficiency, Effectiveness and Empathy [34.82692226532414]
  We propose and empirically investigate a prompt engineering-based approach to generate proto-personas with the support of Generative AI (GenAI)<n>Our goal is to evaluate the approach in terms of efficiency, effectiveness, user acceptance, and the empathy elicited by the generated personas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T13:42:12Z)
• Reasoning LLMs for User-Aware Multimodal Conversational Agents [3.533721662684487]
  Personalization in social robotics is critical for fostering effective human-robot interactions.<n>This paper proposes a novel framework called USER-LLM R1 for a user-aware conversational agent.<n>Our approach integrates chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning models to iteratively infer user preferences and vision-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T13:00:17Z)
• A system for objectively measuring behavior and the environment to support large-scale studies on childhood obesity [7.588188945850937]
  We present an integrated system that collects and extracts multiple behavioral and environmental indicators.<n>Our goal is to present a detailed account of the design principles, the implementation processes, and the evaluation of integrated algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T14:27:09Z)
• TrialBench: Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence-Ready Clinical Trial Datasets [54.98321887435557]
  This paper presents a suite of 23 meticulously curated AI-ready datasets covering multi-modal input features and 8 crucial prediction challenges in clinical trial design.<n>We provide basic validation methods for each task to ensure the datasets' usability and reliability.<n>We anticipate that the availability of such open-access datasets will catalyze the development of advanced AI approaches for clinical trial design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T09:13:10Z)
• Designing Mobile Health for User Engagement: The Importance of Socio-Technical Approach [1.7403133838762446]
  This research examines projects in Sierra Leone where semi-structured interviews were conducted with mHealth designers and developers. Barriers and facilitators to user engagement were identified and classified as either technical or socio-technical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-22T17:06:53Z)
• Towards Automatic Evaluation of Dialog Systems: A Model-Free Off-Policy Evaluation Approach [84.02388020258141]
  We propose a new framework named ENIGMA for estimating human evaluation scores based on off-policy evaluation in reinforcement learning. ENIGMA only requires a handful of pre-collected experience data, and therefore does not involve human interaction with the target policy during the evaluation. Our experiments show that ENIGMA significantly outperforms existing methods in terms of correlation with human evaluation scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-20T03:29:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.