Related papers: On the Carbon Footprint of Economic Research in the Age of Generative AI

On the Carbon Footprint of Economic Research in the Age of Generative AI

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26712v1
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:18:32 GMT
Title: On the Carbon Footprint of Economic Research in the Age of Generative AI
Abstract summary: Green AI research has largely measured the footprint of models rather than the downstream in which GenAI is a tool.<n>We shift the iteration unit of analysis from models to topic and treat prompts as decision policies that allocate discretion between researcher and system.<n>Results identify human in the loop governance as a practical lever to align GenAI productivity with environmental efficiency.
Score: 0.0
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to write and refactor research code, expanding computational workflows. At the same time, Green AI research has largely measured the footprint of models rather than the downstream workflows in which GenAI is a tool. We shift the unit of analysis from models to workflows and treat prompts as decision policies that allocate discretion between researcher and system, governing what is executed and when iteration stops. We contribute in two ways. First, we map the recent Green AI literature into seven themes: training footprint is the largest cluster, while inference efficiency and system level optimisation are growing rapidly, alongside measurement protocols, green algorithms, governance, and security and efficiency trade-offs. Second, we benchmark a modern economic survey workflow, an LDA-based literature mapping implemented with GenAI assisted coding and executed in a fixed cloud notebook, measuring runtime and estimated CO2e with CodeCarbon. Injecting generic green language into prompts has no reliable effect, whereas operational constraints and decision rule prompts deliver large and stable footprint reductions while preserving decision equivalent topic outputs. The results identify human in the loop governance as a practical lever to align GenAI productivity with environmental efficiency.

Related papers

The Open Source Economic Index of AI Adoption and Capability [27.900759713490576]
We work towards measuring both AI adoption and the capability of AI to perform discrete labor tasks across various occupations.<n>We develop an open-source economic index that uses publicly available user-LLM chat data and O*NET tasks to replicate studies produced by frontier AI labs.<n>We build a system that generates benchmark scenarios grounded in O*NET occupations, tasks, and model-context-protocol (MCP) servers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-23T18:45:42Z)
AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide [107.0834449839233]
We present an end-to-end analysis of AI across the complete research lifecycle.<n>We identify a sharp, stage-dependent boundary between reliable assistance and unreliable autonomy.<n>We show that greater automation can obscure rather than eliminate failure modes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-18T17:08:26Z)
AI Co-Scientist for Ranking: Discovering Novel Search Ranking Models alongside LLM-based AI Agents with Cloud Computing Access [60.37646376282544]
We present an AI Co-Scientist framework that automates the full search ranking research pipeline.<n>This is the first study in the ranking community to utilize an AI Co-Scientist framework for algorithmic research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T09:29:08Z)
Evaluating Kubernetes Performance for GenAI Inference: From Automatic Speech Recognition to LLM Summarization [0.47084854837124496]
Generative AI (GenAI) rapidly emerges as a dominant workload category.<n>This industry paper demonstrates how emerging-native projects can be combined to deliver the benefits of container orchestration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-03T15:36:08Z)
EmboCoach-Bench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Developing Embodied Robots [68.29056647487519]
Embodied AI is fueled by high-fidelity simulation and large-scale data collection.<n>However, this scaling capability remains bottlenecked by a reliance on labor-intensive manual oversight.<n>We introduce textscEmboCoach-Bench, a benchmark evaluating the capacity of LLM agents to autonomously engineer embodied policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T11:33:49Z)
Simple Agents Outperform Experts in Biomedical Imaging Workflow Optimization [69.36509281190662]
Adapting production-level computer vision tools to bespoke scientific datasets is a critical "last mile" bottleneck.<n>We consider using AI agents to automate this manual coding, and focus on the open question of optimal agent design.<n>We demonstrate that a simple agent framework consistently generates adaptation code that outperforms human-expert solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-02T18:42:26Z)
Agentic AI Sustainability Assessment for Supply Chain Document Insights [0.0]
This paper presents a comprehensive sustainability assessment framework for document intelligence within supply chain operations centered on agentic artificial intelligence (AI)<n>We address the dual objective of improving automation efficiency while providing measurable environmental performance in document-intensive paper extraction.<n>We show that AI-assisted HITL and agentic AI scenarios achieve reductions of up to 7 in energy consumption, 90-97% in carbon dioxide emissions, and 89-98% in water usage compared to manual processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-10T13:38:08Z)
Barbarians at the Gate: How AI is Upending Systems Research [58.95406995634148]
We argue that systems research, long focused on designing and evaluating new performance-oriented algorithms, is particularly well-suited for AI-driven solution discovery.<n>We term this approach as AI-Driven Research for Systems ( ADRS), which iteratively generates, evaluates, and refines solutions.<n>Our results highlight both the disruptive potential and the urgent need to adapt systems research practices in the age of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-07T17:49:24Z)
Exploring Prompt Patterns in AI-Assisted Code Generation: Towards Faster and More Effective Developer-AI Collaboration [3.1861081539404137]
This paper explores the application of structured prompt patterns to minimize the number of interactions required for satisfactory AI-assisted code generation.<n>We analyzed seven distinct prompt patterns to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing back-and-forth communication between developers and AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T12:43:08Z)
Intelligent Green Efficiency for Intrusion Detection [0.0]
This paper presents an assessment of different programming languages and Feature Selection (FS) methods to improve performance of AI. Experiments were conducted using five ML models - Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Long Short-Term Memory. Results demonstrated that FS plays an important role enhancing the computational efficiency of AI models without compromising detection accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T15:01:55Z)
Learn to Code Sustainably: An Empirical Study on LLM-based Green Code Generation [7.8273713434806345]
We evaluate the sustainability of auto-generate codes produced by generative commercial AI language models. We compare the performance and green capacity of human-generated code and code generated by the three AI language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T22:12:01Z)
On the Opportunities of Green Computing: A Survey [80.21955522431168]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved significant advancements in technology and research with the development over several decades. The needs for high computing power brings higher carbon emission and undermines research fairness. To tackle the challenges of computing resources and environmental impact of AI, Green Computing has become a hot research topic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-01T11:16:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.