Multi-Level Barriers to Generative AI Adoption Across Disciplines and Professional Roles in Higher Education

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27052v1
• Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 23:48:25 GMT
• Title: Multi-Level Barriers to Generative AI Adoption Across Disciplines and Professional Roles in Higher Education
• Abstract summary: This study investigates whether barriers to GenAI adoption are structurally produced.<n>Non-STEM academics report ethical and cultural barriers related to academic integrity.<n> STEM and PSs staff disproportionately emphasize institutional, governance, and infrastructure constraints.
• Score: 0.9029362093259956
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping higher education, yet barriers to its adoption across different disciplines and institutional roles remain underexplored. Existing literature frequently attributes adoption barriers to individual-level factors such as perceived usefulness and ease of use. This study instead investigates whether such barriers are structurally produced. Drawing on a multi-method survey analysis of 272 academic and professional services (PSs) staff at a Russell Group university, we examine how disciplinary contexts and institutional roles shape perceived barriers. By integrating multinomial logistic regression (MLR), structural equation modelling (SEM), and semantic clustering of open-ended responses, we move beyond descriptive accounts to provide a multi-level explanation of GenAI adoption. Our findings reveal clear, systematic differences: non-STEM academics primarily report ethical and cultural barriers related to academic integrity, whereas STEM and PSs staff disproportionately emphasize institutional, governance, and infrastructure constraints. We conclude that GenAI adoption barriers are deeply embedded in organizational ecosystems and epistemic norms, suggesting that universities must move beyond generalized training to develop role-specific governance and support frameworks.

Related papers

• AgentSchool: An LLM-Powered Multi-Agent Simulation for Education [64.62476927093753]
  AgentSchool is a multi-agent simulator that models learning as state transition rather than prompted behavior.<n>It generates plausible traces of peripheral participation, clique formation, aggressor-induced cohesion, and opinion-leader emergence.<n>AgentSchool frames education as a socially meaningful testbed for long-horizon memory, multi-agent coordination, and future institutional reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-28T16:05:58Z)
• Faculty Orientations Shape Adoption of AI in Research and Teaching [0.0]
  This study examined relationships between AI use, attitudes, institutional context, and instructional practice.<n>Results suggest that existing technology-adoption models may not fully explain adoption in contexts where technologies interact directly with disciplinary reasoning and knowledge production.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T09:47:35Z)
• A Systematic AI Adoption Framework for Higher Education: From Student GenAI Usage to Institutional Integration [4.908297240926983]
  This study investigates how students utilize generative artificial intelligence tools in computer science-oriented disciplines.<n>It develops a structured, lightweight framework supporting institutional adaptation to pervasive GenAI usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-23T19:46:15Z)
• From School AI Readiness to Student AI Literacy: A National Multilevel Mediation Analysis of Institutional Capacity and Teacher Capability [7.400138068424031]
  This study develops and tests a 2-2-1 cross-level mediation framework examining how school-level AI readiness is associated with student AI literacy.<n>Using linked survey data from 1,007 vocational institutions, 156,125 teachers, and 2,379,546 students nationwide, multilevel models were estimated to assess direct, indirect, and contextual effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-20T15:38:30Z)
• A Survey of Reasoning in Autonomous Driving Systems: Open Challenges and Emerging Paradigms [49.66022971508878]
  We argue that reasoning should be elevated from a modular component to the system's cognitive core.<n>We derive and systematize seven core reasoning challenges, such as the responsiveness-reasoning trade-off and social-game reasoning.<n>We identify a fundamental and unresolved tension between the high-latency, deliberative nature of LLM-based reasoning and the millisecond-scale, safety-critical demands of vehicle control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-11T07:40:53Z)
• Towards a Science of Collective AI: LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems Need a Transition from Blind Trial-and-Error to Rigorous Science [70.3658845234978]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly extended the capabilities of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS)<n>Despite this rapid progress, the field still relies heavily on empirical trial-and-error.<n>This bottleneck stems from the ambiguity of attribution.<n>We propose a factor attribution paradigm to systematically identify collaboration-driving factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T04:19:52Z)
• Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning based AI tutor for Socratic Interdisciplinary Instruction [21.65910532497379]
  We propose ERL4SIIP, a novel Evolutionary Reinforcement Learning (ERL) framework specifically tailored for this domain.<n>ERL4SIIP integrates: (1) a dynamic student simulator grounded in a STEM knowledge graph for latent state modeling; (2) a Hierarchical Reward Mechanism that decomposes long-horizon goals into dense signals; and (3) a LoRA-Division based optimization strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T02:51:27Z)
• Beyond Automation: Socratic AI, Epistemic Agency, and the Implications of the Emergence of Orchestrated Multi-Agent Learning Architectures [0.0]
  Generative AI is no longer a peripheral tool in higher education.<n>This paper presents findings from a controlled experiment evaluating a Socratic AI Tutor.<n>Students using the Tutor reported significantly greater support for critical, independent, and reflective thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T07:49:03Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• Advancing Education through Tutoring Systems: A Systematic Literature Review [3.276010440333338]
  This study systematically reviews the transformative role of Tutoring Systems, encompassing Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) and Robot Tutoring Systems (RTS)<n>The findings reveal significant advancements in AI techniques that enhance adaptability, engagement, and learning outcomes.<n>The study highlights the complementary strengths of ITS and RTS, proposing integrated hybrid solutions to maximize educational benefits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T18:47:07Z)
• To accept or not to accept? An IRT-TOE Framework to Understand Educators' Resistance to Generative AI in Higher Education [0.0]
  This study aims to develop a theoretical model to empirically predict the barriers preventing educators from adopting Generative Artificial Intelligence in their classrooms. Our approach is grounded in the Innovation Resistance Theory (IRT) framework and augmented with constructs from the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T15:59:19Z)
• Investigating Bi-Level Optimization for Learning and Vision from a Unified Perspective: A Survey and Beyond [114.39616146985001]
  In machine learning and computer vision fields, despite the different motivations and mechanisms, a lot of complex problems contain a series of closely related subproblms. In this paper, we first uniformly express these complex learning and vision problems from the perspective of Bi-Level Optimization (BLO) Then we construct a value-function-based single-level reformulation and establish a unified algorithmic framework to understand and formulate mainstream gradient-based BLO methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T16:20:23Z)
• Distributed and Democratized Learning: Philosophy and Research Challenges [80.39805582015133]
  We propose a novel design philosophy called democratized learning (Dem-AI) Inspired by the societal groups of humans, the specialized groups of learning agents in the proposed Dem-AI system are self-organized in a hierarchical structure to collectively perform learning tasks more efficiently. We present a reference design as a guideline to realize future Dem-AI systems, inspired by various interdisciplinary fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-18T08:45:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.