Faculty Orientations Shape Adoption of AI in Research and Teaching

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18140v1
• Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 09:47:35 GMT
• Title: Faculty Orientations Shape Adoption of AI in Research and Teaching
• Abstract summary: This study examined relationships between AI use, attitudes, institutional context, and instructional practice.<n>Results suggest that existing technology-adoption models may not fully explain adoption in contexts where technologies interact directly with disciplinary reasoning and knowledge production.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite the widespread availability of large language models (LLMs) in higher education, instructors vary substantially in their adoption and use of these tools, and the reasons for this variation remain poorly understood. A mixed-methods survey of 90 STEM faculty in the Research Corporation for Science Advancement (RCSA) Cottrell community examined relationships between AI use, attitudes, institutional context, and instructional practice. Exploratory factor analysis identified a coherent construct, \textit{AI pedagogical orientation}, that strongly predicted self-reported AI use across research, teaching, and other professional activities. Qualitative analysis indicated that this construct reflected differing views about the role AI should play in disciplinary thinking, learning, and expertise development, rather than simply positive or negative attitudes toward AI. Institutional initiatives, demographic variables, and information sources showed comparatively weak associations with AI use. The results suggest that existing technology-adoption models may not fully explain adoption in contexts where technologies interact directly with disciplinary reasoning and knowledge production.

Related papers

• Ontology-supported AI Model and Dataset Management [36.00952535075117]
  This paper aims to answer the question of what is required to exchange and manage AI models and related assets effectively without semantic gaps in an industrial context.<n>We introduce a platform for AI model exchange, which facilitates the usage, exchange, and analysis of AI models and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-21T15:32:57Z)
• A Systematic AI Adoption Framework for Higher Education: From Student GenAI Usage to Institutional Integration [4.908297240926983]
  This study investigates how students utilize generative artificial intelligence tools in computer science-oriented disciplines.<n>It develops a structured, lightweight framework supporting institutional adaptation to pervasive GenAI usage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-23T19:46:15Z)
• Learning AI Without a STEM Background: Mixed-Methods Evidence from a Diverse, Mixed-Cohort AIED Program [0.0]
  This paper presents and evaluates an NSF-funded, innovative mixed-cohort AI education model.<n>We examine learners' academic agency, confidence navigating AI concepts, and perceived expansion of career trajectories.<n>Our findings suggest that human-centered instructional supports, such as ethical scaffolding, mentorship, and structured discussion, are essential components of equitable AI education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-27T01:29:36Z)
• AI Combines, Humans Socialise: A SECI-based Experience Report on Business Simulation Games [0.0]
  This paper reports on the integration of generative AI tools into a Business Simulation Games (BSG) designed for engineering students.<n> AI was embedded as a support mechanism during the simulation to assist students in analysing events, reformulating information, and generating decision-relevant insights.<n>The results suggest a functional boundary in human-AI collaboration within simulation-based learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T07:26:16Z)
• Report on the Scoping Workshop on AI in Science Education Research 2025 [2.0613397238713778]
  Report summarizes the outcomes of a two-day international scoping workshop on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in science education research.<n>As AI rapidly reshapes scientific practice, classroom learning, and research methods, the field faces both new opportunities and significant challenges.<n>Report concludes with actionable recommendations for training, infrastructure, and standards, along with guidance for funders, policymakers, professional organizations, and academic departments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T10:23:22Z)
• AI-Educational Development Loop (AI-EDL): A Conceptual Framework to Bridge AI Capabilities with Classical Educational Theories [8.500617875591633]
  This study introduces the AI-Educational Development Loop (AI-EDL), a theory-driven framework that integrates classical learning theories with human-in-the-loop artificial intelligence (AI)<n>The framework emphasizes transparency, self-regulated learning, and pedagogical oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T15:44:19Z)
• Methodological Foundations for AI-Driven Survey Question Generation [41.94295877935867]
  This paper presents a methodological framework for using generative AI in educational survey research.<n>We explore how Large Language Models can generate adaptive, context-aware survey questions.<n>We examine ethical issues such as bias, privacy, and transparency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T09:50:34Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Generative AI in Education: A Study of Educators' Awareness, Sentiments, and Influencing Factors [2.217351976766501]
  This study delves into university instructors' experiences and attitudes toward AI language models. We find no correlation between teaching style and attitude toward generative AI. While CS educators show far more confidence in their technical understanding of generative AI tools, they show no more confidence in their ability to detect AI-generated work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T19:21:29Z)
• Bringing Generative AI to Adaptive Learning in Education [58.690250000579496]
  We shed light on the intersectional studies of generative AI and adaptive learning. We argue that this union will contribute significantly to the development of the next-stage learning format in education.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T23:54:51Z)
• Toward enriched Cognitive Learning with XAI [44.99833362998488]
  We introduce an intelligent system (CL-XAI) for Cognitive Learning which is supported by artificial intelligence (AI) tools. The use of CL-XAI is illustrated with a game-inspired virtual use case where learners tackle problems to enhance problem-solving skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T16:13:47Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.