Conformal Prediction Assessment: A Framework for Conditional Coverage Evaluation and Selection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27189v1
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 08:30:17 GMT
- Title: Conformal Prediction Assessment: A Framework for Conditional Coverage Evaluation and Selection
- Abstract summary: Conformal Prediction Assessment (CPA) is a framework that reframes the evaluation of conditional coverage as a supervised learning task.<n> Conditional Validity Index (CVI) decomposes reliability into safety (undercoverage risk) and efficiency (overcoverage cost)
- Score: 8.778189690708578
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Conformal prediction provides rigorous distribution-free finite-sample guarantees for marginal coverage under the assumption of exchangeability, but may exhibit systematic undercoverage or overcoverage for specific subpopulations. Assessing conditional validity is challenging, as standard stratification methods suffer from the curse of dimensionality. We propose Conformal Prediction Assessment (CPA), a framework that reframes the evaluation of conditional coverage as a supervised learning task by training a reliability estimator that predicts instance-level coverage probabilities. Building on this estimator, we introduce the Conditional Validity Index (CVI), which decomposes reliability into safety (undercoverage risk) and efficiency (overcoverage cost). We establish convergence rates for the reliability estimator and prove the consistency of CVI-based model selection. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that CPA effectively diagnoses local failure modes and that CC-Select, our CVI-based model selection algorithm, consistently identifies predictors with superior conditional coverage performance.
Related papers
- Audited Conformal Prediction for Classification under Unknown Distribution Shift [18.25994880093428]
We propose Audited Conformal Prediction to train an auxiliary audit model identifying inputs where the legacy model is likely to fail.<n>ACP produces prediction sets that guarantee marginal coverage while achieving substantially higher conditional coverage in practice than existing approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-12T19:28:40Z) - Conditional Coverage Diagnostics for Conformal Prediction [47.93989136542648]
We show that conditional coverage estimation can be a classification problem.<n>We call the resulting family of metrics excess risk of the target coverage (ERT)<n>We release an open-source package for ERT as well as previous conditional coverage metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-12T18:47:39Z) - COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z) - SConU: Selective Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models [59.25881667640868]
We propose a novel approach termed Selective Conformal Uncertainty (SConU)<n>We develop two conformal p-values that are instrumental in determining whether a given sample deviates from the uncertainty distribution of the calibration set at a specific manageable risk level.<n>Our approach not only facilitates rigorous management of miscoverage rates across both single-domain and interdisciplinary contexts, but also enhances the efficiency of predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-19T03:01:45Z) - Rectifying Conformity Scores for Better Conditional Coverage [75.73184036344908]
We present a new method for generating confidence sets within the split conformal prediction framework.<n>Our method performs a trainable transformation of any given conformity score to improve conditional coverage while ensuring exact marginal coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-22T19:54:14Z) - Noise-Adaptive Conformal Classification with Marginal Coverage [53.74125453366155]
We introduce an adaptive conformal inference method capable of efficiently handling deviations from exchangeability caused by random label noise.<n>We validate our method through extensive numerical experiments demonstrating its effectiveness on synthetic and real data sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-29T23:55:23Z) - Probabilistic Conformal Prediction with Approximate Conditional Validity [81.30551968980143]
We develop a new method for generating prediction sets that combines the flexibility of conformal methods with an estimate of the conditional distribution.
Our method consistently outperforms existing approaches in terms of conditional coverage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T20:44:48Z) - The Penalized Inverse Probability Measure for Conformal Classification [0.5172964916120902]
The work introduces the Penalized Inverse Probability (PIP) nonconformity score, and its regularized version RePIP, that allow the joint optimization of both efficiency and informativeness.
The work shows how PIP-based conformal classifiers exhibit precisely the desired behavior in comparison with other nonconformity measures and strike a good balance between informativeness and efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T07:37:16Z) - Conformal Prediction with Learned Features [22.733758606168873]
We propose Partition Learning Conformal Prediction (PLCP) to improve conditional validity of prediction sets.
We implement PLCP efficiently with gradient alternating descent, utilizing off-the-shelf machine learning models.
Our experimental results over four real-world and synthetic datasets show the superior performance of PLCP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-26T15:43:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.