Can Large Language Models Simulate Human Cognition Beyond Behavioral Imitation?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27694v1
• Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 13:44:55 GMT
• Title: Can Large Language Models Simulate Human Cognition Beyond Behavioral Imitation?
• Abstract summary: An essential problem in artificial intelligence is whether LLMs can simulate human cognition or merely imitate surface-level behaviors.<n>We introduce a benchmark grounded in the longitudinal research trajectories of 217 researchers across diverse domains of artificial intelligence.<n>A multidimensional cognitive alignment metric is proposed to assess individual-level cognitive consistency.
• Score: 45.36751031924419
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: An essential problem in artificial intelligence is whether LLMs can simulate human cognition or merely imitate surface-level behaviors, while existing datasets suffer from either synthetic reasoning traces or population-level aggregation, failing to capture authentic individual cognitive patterns. We introduce a benchmark grounded in the longitudinal research trajectories of 217 researchers across diverse domains of artificial intelligence, where each author's scientific publications serve as an externalized representation of their cognitive processes. To distinguish whether LLMs transfer cognitive patterns or merely imitate behaviors, our benchmark deliberately employs a cross-domain, temporal-shift generalization setting. A multidimensional cognitive alignment metric is further proposed to assess individual-level cognitive consistency. Through systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs and various enhancement techniques, we provide a first-stage empirical study on the questions: (1) How well do current LLMs simulate human cognition? and (2) How far can existing techniques enhance these capabilities?

Related papers

• HUMANLLM: Benchmarking and Reinforcing LLM Anthropomorphism via Human Cognitive Patterns [59.17423586203706]
  We present HUMANLLM, a framework treating psychological patterns as interacting causal forces.<n>We construct 244 patterns from 12,000 academic papers and synthesize 11,359 scenarios where 2-5 patterns reinforce, conflict, or modulate each other.<n>Our dual-level checklists evaluate both individual pattern fidelity and emergent multi-pattern dynamics, achieving strong human alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T08:56:53Z)
• Individualized Cognitive Simulation in Large Language Models: Evaluating Different Cognitive Representation Methods [36.28947625215469]
  Large language models (LLMs) convincingly mimic surface-level human behavior such as role-play.<n>But their ability to simulate deeper individualized cognitive processes remains poorly understood.<n>We evaluate different cognitive representations, e.g., linguistic features, concept mappings, and profile-based information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T06:18:15Z)
• 11Plus-Bench: Demystifying Multimodal LLM Spatial Reasoning with Cognitive-Inspired Analysis [54.24689751375923]
  This work introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess the spatial reasoning abilities of state-of-the-art MLLMs.<n>Through experiments across 14 MLLMs and human evaluation, we find that current MLLMs exhibit early signs of spatial cognition.<n>These findings highlight both emerging capabilities and limitations in current MLLMs' spatial reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T17:22:34Z)
• Measurement of LLM's Philosophies of Human Nature [113.47929131143766]
  We design the standardized psychological scale specifically targeting large language models (LLM)<n>We show that current LLMs exhibit a systemic lack of trust in humans.<n>We propose a mental loop learning framework, which enables LLM to continuously optimize its value system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T06:22:19Z)
• If an LLM Were a Character, Would It Know Its Own Story? Evaluating Lifelong Learning in LLMs [55.8331366739144]
  We introduce LIFESTATE-BENCH, a benchmark designed to assess lifelong learning in large language models (LLMs)<n>Our fact checking evaluation probes models' self-awareness, episodic memory retrieval, and relationship tracking, across both parametric and non-parametric approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T16:50:57Z)
• Human Cognitive Benchmarks Reveal Foundational Visual Gaps in MLLMs [65.93003087656754]
  VisFactor is a benchmark that digitizes 20 vision-centric subtests from a well-established cognitive psychology assessment.<n>We evaluate 20 frontier Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) from GPT, Gemini, Claude, LLaMA, Qwen, and SEED families.<n>The best-performing model achieves a score of only 25.19 out of 100, with consistent failures on tasks such as mental rotation, spatial relation inference, and figure-ground discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T04:21:32Z)
• Humanlike Cognitive Patterns as Emergent Phenomena in Large Language Models [2.9312156642007294]
  We systematically review Large Language Models' capabilities across three important cognitive domains: decision-making biases, reasoning, and creativity.<n>On decision-making, our synthesis reveals that while LLMs demonstrate several human-like biases, some biases observed in humans are absent.<n>On reasoning, advanced LLMs like GPT-4 exhibit deliberative reasoning akin to human System-2 thinking, while smaller models fall short of human-level performance.<n>A distinct dichotomy emerges in creativity: while LLMs excel in language-based creative tasks, such as storytelling, they struggle with divergent thinking tasks that require real-world context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T02:26:56Z)
• CogniDual Framework: Self-Training Large Language Models within a Dual-System Theoretical Framework for Improving Cognitive Tasks [39.43278448546028]
  Kahneman's dual-system theory elucidates the human decision-making process, distinguishing between the rapid, intuitive System 1 and the deliberative, rational System 2. Recent advancements have positioned large language Models (LLMs) as formidable tools nearing human-level proficiency in various cognitive tasks. This study introduces the textbfCogniDual Framework for LLMs (CFLLMs), designed to assess whether LLMs can, through self-training, evolve from deliberate deduction to intuitive responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T09:33:24Z)
• Large Language Models and Cognitive Science: A Comprehensive Review of Similarities, Differences, and Challenges [14.739357670600102]
  This comprehensive review explores the intersection of Large Language Models (LLMs) and cognitive science.<n>We analyze methods for evaluating LLMs cognitive abilities and discuss their potential as cognitive models.<n>We assess cognitive biases and limitations of LLMs, along with proposed methods for improving their performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T02:30:12Z)
• Human Simulacra: Benchmarking the Personification of Large Language Models [38.21708264569801]
  Large language models (LLMs) are recognized as systems that closely mimic aspects of human intelligence.<n>This paper introduces a framework for constructing virtual characters' life stories from the ground up.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our constructed simulacra can produce personified responses that align with their target characters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T09:11:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.