Baby Scale: Investigating Models Trained on Individual Children's Language Input

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.29522v1
• Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:06:24 GMT
• Title: Baby Scale: Investigating Models Trained on Individual Children's Language Input
• Abstract summary: Modern language models must be trained on many orders of magnitude more words of training data than human children receive.<n>We benchmark LMs on human-scale datasets to understand how linguistic knowledge emerges from children's natural training data.<n>We find that LMs trained on child data show acceptable scaling for grammar tasks, but lower scaling on semantic and world knowledge tasks than models trained on synthetic data.
• Score: 2.3226022042424934
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern language models (LMs) must be trained on many orders of magnitude more words of training data than human children receive before they begin to produce useful behavior. Assessing the nature and origins of this "data gap" requires benchmarking LMs on human-scale datasets to understand how linguistic knowledge emerges from children's natural training data. Using transcripts from the BabyView dataset (videos from children ages 6-36 months), we investigate (1) scaling performance at child-scale data regimes, (2) variability in model performance across datasets from different children's experiences and linguistic predictors of dataset quality, and (3) relationships between model and child language learning outcomes. LMs trained on child data show acceptable scaling for grammar tasks, but lower scaling on semantic and world knowledge tasks than models trained on synthetic data; we also observe substantial variability on data from different children. Beyond dataset size, performance is most associated with a combination of distributional and interactional linguistic features, broadly consistent with what makes high-quality input for child language development. Finally, model likelihoods for individual words correlate with children's learning of those words, suggesting that properties of child-directed input may influence both model learning and human language development. Overall, understanding what properties make language data efficient for learning can enable more powerful small-scale language models while also shedding light on human language acquisition.

Related papers

• Findings of the BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corpora [84.03928547166873]
  Children can acquire language from less than 100 million words of input.<n>Large language models are far less data-efficient: they typically require 3 or 4 orders of magnitude more data and still do not perform as well as humans on many evaluations.<n>The BabyLM Challenge is a communal effort in which participants compete to optimize language model training on a fixed data budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T23:22:43Z)
• Is Child-Directed Speech Effective Training Data for Language Models? [34.46268640655943]
  We train GPT-2 and RoBERTa models on 29M words of English child-directed speech. We test whether the global developmental ordering or the local discourse ordering of children's training data supports high performance relative to other datasets. These findings support the hypothesis that, rather than proceeding from better data, the child's learning algorithm is substantially more data-efficient than current language modeling techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T08:18:51Z)
• DevBench: A multimodal developmental benchmark for language learning [0.34129029452670606]
  We introduce DevBench, a benchmark for evaluating vision-language models on tasks and behavioral data.<n>We show that DevBench provides a benchmark for comparing models to human language development.<n>These comparisons highlight ways in which model and human language learning processes diverge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T17:49:41Z)
• Visual Grounding Helps Learn Word Meanings in Low-Data Regimes [47.7950860342515]
  Modern neural language models (LMs) are powerful tools for modeling human sentence production and comprehension. But to achieve these results, LMs must be trained in distinctly un-human-like ways. Do models trained more naturalistically -- with grounded supervision -- exhibit more humanlike language learning? We investigate this question in the context of word learning, a key sub-task in language acquisition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T03:33:36Z)
• What Artificial Neural Networks Can Tell Us About Human Language Acquisition [47.761188531404066]
  Rapid progress in machine learning for natural language processing has the potential to transform debates about how humans learn language. To increase the relevance of learnability results from computational models, we need to train model learners without significant advantages over humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T00:12:37Z)
• An Empirical Investigation of Commonsense Self-Supervision with Knowledge Graphs [67.23285413610243]
  Self-supervision based on the information extracted from large knowledge graphs has been shown to improve the generalization of language models. We study the effect of knowledge sampling strategies and sizes that can be used to generate synthetic data for adapting language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T19:49:04Z)
• Word Acquisition in Neural Language Models [0.38073142980733]
  We investigate how neural language models acquire individual words during training, extracting learning curves and ages of acquisition for over 600 words. We find that the effects of concreteness, word length, and lexical class are pointedly different in children and language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T23:26:16Z)
• A Visuospatial Dataset for Naturalistic Verb Learning [18.654373173232205]
  We introduce a new dataset for training and evaluating grounded language models. Our data is collected within a virtual reality environment and is designed to emulate the quality of language data to which a pre-verbal child is likely to have access. We use the collected data to compare several distributional semantics models for verb learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-28T20:47:13Z)
• Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
  Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict. This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data. Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)
• Data Augmentation for Spoken Language Understanding via Pretrained Language Models [113.56329266325902]
  Training of spoken language understanding (SLU) models often faces the problem of data scarcity. We put forward a data augmentation method using pretrained language models to boost the variability and accuracy of generated utterances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-29T04:07:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.