Are they human? Detecting large language models by probing human memory constraints

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00016v1
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 21:15:19 GMT
• Title: Are they human? Detecting large language models by probing human memory constraints
• Abstract summary: The validity of online behavioral research relies on study participants being human rather than machine.<n>General-purpose agents based on large language models (LLMs) can now solve many challenges, threatening the validity of online behavioral research.<n>We show that cognitive modeling on a standard serial recall task can be used to distinguish online participants from LLMs.
• Score: 7.063564727972718
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The validity of online behavioral research relies on study participants being human rather than machine. In the past, it was possible to detect machines by posing simple challenges that were easily solved by humans but not by machines. General-purpose agents based on large language models (LLMs) can now solve many of these challenges, threatening the validity of online behavioral research. Here we explore the idea of detecting humanness by using tasks that machines can solve too well to be human. Specifically, we probe for the existence of an established human cognitive constraint: limited working memory capacity. We show that cognitive modeling on a standard serial recall task can be used to distinguish online participants from LLMs even when the latter are specifically instructed to mimic human working memory constraints. Our results demonstrate that it is viable to use well-established cognitive phenomena to distinguish LLMs from humans.

Related papers

• Emergence of Human to Robot Transfer in Vision-Language-Action Models [88.76648919814771]
  Vision-language-action (VLA) models can enable broad open world generalization, but require large and diverse datasets.<n>We show that human-to-robot transfer emerges once the VLA is pre-trained on sufficient scenes, tasks, and embodiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-27T00:13:11Z)
• HumanPCR: Probing MLLM Capabilities in Diverse Human-Centric Scenes [72.26829188852139]
  HumanPCR is an evaluation suite for probing MLLMs' capacity about human-related visual contexts.<n>Human-P, HumanThought-C, and Human-R feature over 6,000 human-verified multiple choice questions.<n>Human-R offers a challenging manually curated video reasoning test.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T09:52:04Z)
• Theory of Mind abilities of Large Language Models in Human-Robot Interaction : An Illusion? [18.770522926093786]
  Large Language Models have shown exceptional generative abilities in various natural language and generation tasks. We study a special application of ToM abilities that has higher stakes and possibly irreversible consequences. We focus on the task of Perceived Behavior Recognition, where a robot employs a Large Language Model (LLM) to assess the robot's generated behavior in a manner similar to human observer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T18:09:36Z)
• MacGyver: Are Large Language Models Creative Problem Solvers? [87.70522322728581]
  We explore the creative problem-solving capabilities of modern LLMs in a novel constrained setting.<n>We create MACGYVER, an automatically generated dataset consisting of over 1,600 real-world problems.<n>We present our collection to both LLMs and humans to compare and contrast their problem-solving abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T08:52:27Z)
• Human-Like Intuitive Behavior and Reasoning Biases Emerged in Language Models -- and Disappeared in GPT-4 [0.0]
  We show that large language models (LLMs) exhibit behavior that resembles human-like intuition. We also probe how sturdy the inclination for intuitive-like decision-making is.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T08:43:13Z)
• User Behavior Simulation with Large Language Model based Agents [116.74368915420065]
  We propose an LLM-based agent framework and design a sandbox environment to simulate real user behaviors. Based on extensive experiments, we find that the simulated behaviors of our method are very close to the ones of real humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T02:58:35Z)
• Large Language Models as Zero-Shot Human Models for Human-Robot Interaction [12.455647753787442]
  Large-language models (LLMs) can act as zero-shot human models for human-robot interaction. LLMs achieve performance comparable to purpose-built models. We present one case study on a simulated trust-based table-clearing task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T23:16:24Z)
• Self-Improving Robots: End-to-End Autonomous Visuomotor Reinforcement Learning [54.636562516974884]
  In imitation and reinforcement learning, the cost of human supervision limits the amount of data that robots can be trained on. In this work, we propose MEDAL++, a novel design for self-improving robotic systems. The robot autonomously practices the task by learning to both do and undo the task, simultaneously inferring the reward function from the demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T18:51:38Z)
• On pitfalls (and advantages) of sophisticated large language models [0.0]
  Overreliance on large language models can have disruptive consequences. Privacy rights, the possibility of circulating counterfeits of humans, and, last but not least, it makes a massive spread of misinformation possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-25T11:14:39Z)
• Thinking Fast and Slow in Large Language Models [0.08057006406834465]
  Large language models (LLMs) are currently at the forefront of intertwining AI systems with human communication and everyday life. In this study, we show that LLMs like GPT-3 exhibit behavior that resembles human-like intuition - and the cognitive errors that come with it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-10T05:07:30Z)
• Can Machines Imitate Humans? Integrative Turing-like tests for Language and Vision Demonstrate a Narrowing Gap [56.611702960809644]
  We benchmark AI's ability to imitate humans in three language tasks and three vision tasks.<n>Next, we conducted 72,191 Turing-like tests with 1,916 human judges and 10 AI judges.<n>Imitation ability showed minimal correlation with conventional AI performance metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T16:16:52Z)
• Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-trained Language Models [78.19379997967191]
  We draw inspiration from psychometric studies by leveraging human personality theory as a tool for studying machine behaviors. To answer these questions, we introduce the Machine Personality Inventory (MPI) tool for studying machine behaviors. MPI follows standardized personality tests, built upon the Big Five Personality Factors (Big Five) theory and personality assessment inventories. We devise a Personality Prompting (P2) method to induce LLMs with specific personalities in a controllable way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T07:32:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.