OrgAgent: Organize Your Multi-Agent System like a Company
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01020v1
- Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2026 15:21:14 GMT
- Title: OrgAgent: Organize Your Multi-Agent System like a Company
- Abstract summary: We introduce OrgAgent, a company-style hierarchical multi-agent framework.<n>We find that multi-agent systems organized in a company-style hierarchy generally outperform other organizational structures.
- Score: 75.47076168155817
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: While large language model-based multi-agent systems have shown strong potential for complex reasoning, how to effectively organize multiple agents remains an open question. In this paper, we introduce OrgAgent, a company-style hierarchical multi-agent framework that separates collaboration into governance, execution, and compliance layers. OrgAgent decomposes multi-agent reasoning into three layers: a governance layer for planning and resource allocation, an execution layer for task solving and review, and a compliance layer for final answer control. By evaluating the framework across reasoning tasks, LLMs, execution modes, and execution policies, we find that multi-agent systems organized in a company-style hierarchy generally outperform other organizational structures. Besides, hierarchical coordination also reduces token consumption relative to flat collaboration in most settings. For example, for GPT-OSS-120B, the hierarchical setting improves performance over flat multi-agent system by 102.73% while reducing token usage by 74.52% on SQuAD 2.0. Further analysis shows that hierarchy helps most when tasks benefit from stable skill assignment, controlled information flow, and layered verification. Overall, our findings highlight organizational structure as an important factor in multi-agent reasoning, shaping not only effectiveness and cost, but also coordination behavior.
Related papers
- BOAD: Discovering Hierarchical Software Engineering Agents via Bandit Optimization [41.08366028094234]
Large language models (LLMs) struggle to generalize to real-world software engineering problems.<n>Existing systems often rely on a single agent to handle the entire workflow-interpreting issues.<n>Motivated by how human engineers decompose complex problems, we propose structuring SWE agents as orchestrators coordinating specialized sub-agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-29T17:41:11Z) - Designing Domain-Specific Agents via Hierarchical Task Abstraction Mechanism [61.01709143437043]
We introduce a novel agent design framework centered on a Hierarchical Task Abstraction Mechanism (HTAM)<n>Specifically, HTAM moves beyond emulating social roles, instead structuring multi-agent systems into a logical hierarchy that mirrors the intrinsic task-dependency graph of a given domain.<n>We instantiate this framework as EarthAgent, a multi-agent system tailored for complex geospatial analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-21T12:25:47Z) - AgentRouter: A Knowledge-Graph-Guided LLM Router for Collaborative Multi-Agent Question Answering [51.07491603393163]
tAgent is a framework that formulates multi-agent QA as a knowledge-graph-guided routing problem supervised by empirical performance signals.<n>By leveraging soft supervision and weighted aggregation of agent outputs, Agent learns principled collaboration schemes that capture the complementary strengths of diverse agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-06T23:20:49Z) - InfiAgent: Self-Evolving Pyramid Agent Framework for Infinite Scenarios [28.65914611521654]
InfiAgent is a Pyramid-like DAG-based Multi-Agent Framework that can be applied to textbfinfinite scenarios.<n>InfiAgent achieves 9.9% higher performance compared to ADAS (similar auto-generated agent framework)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-26T15:44:09Z) - AgentOrchestra: Orchestrating Hierarchical Multi-Agent Intelligence with the Tool-Environment-Agent(TEA) Protocol [22.406849007798858]
We propose the Tool-Environment-Agent Protocol to integrate environments, agents, and tools into an unified system.<n>We introduce AgentOrchestra, a hierarchical multi-agent framework with a central planning agent that decomposes complex objectives and coordinates specialized agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-14T13:45:37Z) - AgentSwift: Efficient LLM Agent Design via Value-guided Hierarchical Search [58.98450205734779]
Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated strong capabilities across diverse domains.<n>Existing agent search methods suffer from three major limitations.<n>We introduce a comprehensive framework to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-06T12:07:23Z) - MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents [59.825725526176655]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents.<n>Existing benchmarks either focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition.<n>We introduce MultiAgentBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-03T05:18:50Z) - Agent-Oriented Planning in Multi-Agent Systems [54.429028104022066]
We propose AOP, a novel framework for agent-oriented planning in multi-agent systems.<n>In this study, we identify three critical design principles of agent-oriented planning, including solvability, completeness, and non-redundancy.<n> Extensive experiments demonstrate the advancement of AOP in solving real-world problems compared to both single-agent systems and existing planning strategies for multi-agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T04:07:51Z) - Agents meet OKR: An Object and Key Results Driven Agent System with
Hierarchical Self-Collaboration and Self-Evaluation [25.308341461293857]
OKR-Agent is designed to enhance the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in task-solving.
Our framework includes two novel modules: hierarchical Objects and Key Results generation and multi-level evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-28T06:16:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.