XrayClaw: Cooperative-Competitive Multi-Agent Alignment for Trustworthy Chest X-ray Diagnosis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02695v1
- Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 03:39:30 GMT
- Title: XrayClaw: Cooperative-Competitive Multi-Agent Alignment for Trustworthy Chest X-ray Diagnosis
- Abstract summary: XrayClaw is a novel framework that operationalizes multi-agent alignment through a sophisticated cooperative-competitive architecture.<n>XrayClaw integrates four specialized cooperative agents to simulate a systematic clinical workflow, alongside a competitive agent that serves as an independent auditor.<n>Our results indicate that XrayClaw effectively mitigates cumulative hallucinations and enhances the overall reliability of automated CXR diagnosis.
- Score: 0.8880611506199769
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation is a fundamental yet complex clinical task that increasingly relies on artificial intelligence for automation. However, traditional monolithic models often lack the nuanced reasoning required for trustworthy diagnosis, frequently leading to logical inconsistencies and diagnostic hallucinations. While multi-agent systems offer a potential solution by simulating collaborative consultations, existing frameworks remain susceptible to consensus-based errors when instantiated by a single underlying model. This paper introduces XrayClaw, a novel framework that operationalizes multi-agent alignment through a sophisticated cooperative-competitive architecture. XrayClaw integrates four specialized cooperative agents to simulate a systematic clinical workflow, alongside a competitive agent that serves as an independent auditor. To reconcile these distinct diagnostic pathways, we propose Competitive Preference Optimization, a learning objective that penalizes illogical reasoning by enforcing mutual verification between analytical and holistic interpretations. Extensive empirical evaluations on the MS-CXR-T, MIMIC-CXR, and CheXbench benchmarks demonstrate that XrayClaw achieves state-of-the-art performance in diagnostic accuracy, clinical reasoning fidelity, and zero-shot domain generalization. Our results indicate that XrayClaw effectively mitigates cumulative hallucinations and enhances the overall reliability of automated CXR diagnosis, establishing a new paradigm for trustworthy medical imaging analysis.
Related papers
- Concept-Grounded Reasoning with Prompt-Driven Localization for Interpretable Structured Report Generation [66.62662330558906]
CORAL is a multimodal framework that integrates spatial grounding and concept-level supervision into a unified reasoning process.<n>CORAL employs a prompt-driven medical segmentation model to localize lesions and predicts multi-class clinical attributes through a Concept Bottleneck module.<n>Experiments on BUS-CoT and IU X-ray datasets demonstrate consistent improvements in diagnostic accuracy, concept consistency, and report quality over strong general-purpose and medical MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-14T10:21:23Z) - Dementia Etiology Diagnosis via Collaborative Meta Knowledge Enhancement [81.27196033392559]
We propose a Collaborative Meta Knowledge Enhancement (COME) framework for dementia etiology diagnosis.<n>COME injects multi-center acquisition semantics, source identifiers, and modality indicators as heterogeneity-aware embeddings into a unified Transformer architecture for scale-up training.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art in-domain performance with a mean macro-averaged AUC of 85.62% and a 4.29-point gain over the strongest baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-24T04:26:47Z) - Cerebra: A Multidisciplinary AI Board for Multimodal Dementia Characterization and Risk Assessment [56.62016795093786]
Cerebra is an interactive multi-agent AI team that coordinates specialized agents for EHR, clinical notes, and medical imaging analysis.<n>It supports privacy-preserving deployment by operating on structured representations and remains robust when modalities are incomplete.<n>Cerebra significantly improved expert performance, increasing accuracy by 17.5 percentage points in prospective dementia risk estimation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-23T05:46:45Z) - Clinical Cognition Alignment for Gastrointestinal Diagnosis with Multimodal LLMs [63.535652574541764]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in medical image analysis.<n>Their application in gastrointestinal endoscopy is currently hindered by two critical limitations.<n>We propose a novel Clinical-Cognitive-Aligned (CogAlign) framework to address these challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-21T07:47:37Z) - MedCoRAG: Interpretable Hepatology Diagnosis via Hybrid Evidence Retrieval and Multispecialty Consensus [24.19892707167392]
Existing AI approaches for clinical diagnosis often lack transparency, structured reasoning, and deployability.<n>We propose MedCoRAG, an end-to-end framework that generates diagnostic hypotheses from standardized abnormal findings.<n>It then constructs a patient-specific evidence package by jointly retrieving and pruning UMLS knowledge graph paths and clinical guidelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-05T12:58:45Z) - MedCollab: Causal-Driven Multi-Agent Collaboration for Full-Cycle Clinical Diagnosis via IBIS-Structured Argumentation [6.334763475104128]
We present MedCollab, a novel multi-agent framework that emulates the hierarchical consultation workflow of modern hospitals.<n>The framework incorporates a dynamic specialist recruitment mechanism that adaptively assembles clinical and examination agents according to patient-specific symptoms and examination results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-01T14:25:58Z) - RE-MCDF: Closed-Loop Multi-Expert LLM Reasoning for Knowledge-Grounded Clinical Diagnosis [11.973474883672282]
We propose RE-MCDF, a relation-enhanced multi-expert clinical diagnosis framework.<n>We show that RE-MCDF consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in complex diagnostic scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T15:53:27Z) - AgentsEval: Clinically Faithful Evaluation of Medical Imaging Reports via Multi-Agent Reasoning [73.50200033931148]
We introduce AgentsEval, a multi-agent stream reasoning framework that emulates the collaborative diagnostic workflow of radiologists.<n>By dividing the evaluation process into interpretable steps including criteria definition, evidence extraction, alignment, and consistency scoring, AgentsEval provides explicit reasoning traces and structured clinical feedback.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that AgentsEval delivers clinically aligned, semantically faithful, and interpretable evaluations that remain robust under paraphrastic, semantic, and stylistic perturbations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-23T11:59:13Z) - CXRAgent: Director-Orchestrated Multi-Stage Reasoning for Chest X-Ray Interpretation [62.0150409256153]
We propose CXRAgent, a director-orchestrated, multi-stage agent for CXR interpretation.<n>The agent strategically orchestrates a set of CXR-analysis tools, with outputs normalized and verified by the Evidence-driven Validator.<n>Experiments on various CXR interpretation tasks show that CXRAgent delivers strong performance, providing visual evidence and generalizes well to clinical tasks of different complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-24T10:31:30Z) - RadFabric: Agentic AI System with Reasoning Capability for Radiology [61.25593938175618]
RadFabric is a multi agent, multimodal reasoning framework that unifies visual and textual analysis for comprehensive CXR interpretation.<n>System employs specialized CXR agents for pathology detection, an Anatomical Interpretation Agent to map visual findings to precise anatomical structures, and a Reasoning Agent powered by large multimodal reasoning models to synthesize visual, anatomical, and clinical data into transparent and evidence based diagnoses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-17T03:10:33Z) - Instrumental Variable Learning for Chest X-ray Classification [52.68170685918908]
We propose an interpretable instrumental variable (IV) learning framework to eliminate the spurious association and obtain accurate causal representation.
Our approach's performance is demonstrated using the MIMIC-CXR, NIH ChestX-ray 14, and CheXpert datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-20T03:12:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.