Investigating Data Interventions for Subgroup Fairness: An ICU Case Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03478v1
• Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 21:56:59 GMT
• Title: Investigating Data Interventions for Subgroup Fairness: An ICU Case Study
• Abstract summary: In high-stakes settings where machine learning models are used to automate decision-making about individuals, the presence of algorithmic bias can exacerbate systemic harm.<n>We investigate the limitations of combining data sources to improve subgroup performance within the context of healthcare.<n>We find that data addition can both help and hurt model fairness and performance, and many intuitive strategies for data selection are unreliable.
• Score: 3.9822386990811593
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In high-stakes settings where machine learning models are used to automate decision-making about individuals, the presence of algorithmic bias can exacerbate systemic harm to certain subgroups of people. These biases often stem from the underlying training data. In practice, interventions to "fix the data" depend on the actual additional data sources available -- where many are less than ideal. In these cases, the effects of data scaling on subgroup performance become volatile, as the improvements from increased sample size are counteracted by the introduction of distribution shifts in the training set. In this paper, we investigate the limitations of combining data sources to improve subgroup performance within the context of healthcare. Clinical models are commonly trained on datasets comprised of patient electronic health record (EHR) data from different hospitals or admission departments. Across two such datasets, the eICU Collaborative Research Database and the MIMIC-IV dataset, we find that data addition can both help and hurt model fairness and performance, and many intuitive strategies for data selection are unreliable. We compare model-based post-hoc calibration and data-centric addition strategies to find that the combination of both is important to improve subgroup performance. Our work questions the traditional dogma of "better data" for overcoming fairness challenges by comparing and combining data- and model-based approaches.

Related papers

• Towards Understanding Valuable Preference Data for Large Language Model Alignment [85.38864561060088]
  Large language model (LLM) alignment is typically achieved through learning from human preference comparisons.<n>We assess data quality through individual influence on validation data using our newly proposed truncated influence function (TIF)<n>To this end, we combine them to offset their diverse error sources, resulting in a simple yet effective data selection rule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T06:57:55Z)
• Group-Level Data Selection for Efficient Pretraining [49.18903821780051]
  Group-MATES is an efficient group-level data selection approach to optimize the speed-quality frontier of language model pretraining.<n>Group-MATES parameterizes costly group-level selection with a relational data influence model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T16:34:46Z)
• Improving Equity in Health Modeling with GPT4-Turbo Generated Synthetic Data: A Comparative Study [1.85743121594882]
  Demographic groups are often represented at different rates in medical datasets.<n>These differences can create bias in machine learning algorithms, with higher levels of performance for better-represented groups.<n>One promising solution is to generate synthetic data to mitigate potential adverse effects of non-representative data sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T20:49:17Z)
• Fair Distributed Machine Learning with Imbalanced Data as a Stackelberg Evolutionary Game [0.0]
  We consider distributed learning as an Stackelberg evolutionary game.<n>We use three medical datasets to highlight the impact of dynamic weighting on underrepresented nodes in distributed learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T17:23:12Z)
• Enhancing Performance for Highly Imbalanced Medical Data via Data Regularization in a Federated Learning Setting [6.22153888560487]
  The goal of the proposed method is to enhance model performance for cardiovascular disease prediction. The method is evaluated across four datasets for cardiovascular disease prediction, which are scattered across different clients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T19:15:38Z)
• Striving for data-model efficiency: Identifying data externalities on group performance [75.17591306911015]
  Building trustworthy, effective, and responsible machine learning systems hinges on understanding how differences in training data and modeling decisions interact to impact predictive performance. We focus on a particular type of data-model inefficiency, in which adding training data from some sources can actually lower performance evaluated on key sub-groups of the population. Our results indicate that data-efficiency is a key component of both accurate and trustworthy machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T16:48:27Z)
• Core-set Selection Using Metrics-based Explanations (CSUME) for multiclass ECG [2.0520503083305073]
  We show how a selection of good quality data improves deep learning model performance. Our experimental results show a 9.67% and 8.69% precision and recall improvement with a significant training data volume reduction of 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T19:36:28Z)
• SANSformers: Self-Supervised Forecasting in Electronic Health Records with Attention-Free Models [48.07469930813923]
  This work aims to forecast the demand for healthcare services, by predicting the number of patient visits to healthcare facilities. We introduce SANSformer, an attention-free sequential model designed with specific inductive biases to cater for the unique characteristics of EHR data. Our results illuminate the promising potential of tailored attention-free models and self-supervised pretraining in refining healthcare utilization predictions across various patient demographics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-31T08:23:56Z)
• Cohort Bias Adaptation in Aggregated Datasets for Lesion Segmentation [0.8466401378239363]
  We propose a generalized affine conditioning framework to learn and account for cohort biases across multi-source datasets. We show that our cohort bias adaptation method improves performance of the network on pooled datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-02T08:32:57Z)
• On the Efficacy of Adversarial Data Collection for Question Answering: Results from a Large-Scale Randomized Study [65.17429512679695]
  In adversarial data collection (ADC), a human workforce interacts with a model in real time, attempting to produce examples that elicit incorrect predictions. Despite ADC's intuitive appeal, it remains unclear when training on adversarial datasets produces more robust models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T00:48:33Z)
• Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
  This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model. We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data. Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z)
• Adversarial Sample Enhanced Domain Adaptation: A Case Study on Predictive Modeling with Electronic Health Records [57.75125067744978]
  We propose a data augmentation method to facilitate domain adaptation. adversarially generated samples are used during domain adaptation. Results confirm the effectiveness of our method and the generality on different tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-13T03:20:20Z)
• Predictive Modeling of ICU Healthcare-Associated Infections from Imbalanced Data. Using Ensembles and a Clustering-Based Undersampling Approach [55.41644538483948]
  This work is focused on both the identification of risk factors and the prediction of healthcare-associated infections in intensive-care units. The aim is to support decision making addressed at reducing the incidence rate of infections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-07T16:13:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.