ResearchEVO: An End-to-End Framework for Automated Scientific Discovery and Documentation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.05587v1
• Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 08:29:41 GMT
• Title: ResearchEVO: An End-to-End Framework for Automated Scientific Discovery and Documentation
• Abstract summary: ResearchEVO is an end-to-end framework that instantiates the discover-then-explain paradigm.<n>ResearchEVO is the first system to cover this full pipeline end to end.<n>We validate the framework on two cross-disciplinary scientific problems.
• Score: 21.79305115558105
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: An important recurring pattern in scientific breakthroughs is a two-stage process: an initial phase of undirected experimentation that yields an unexpected finding, followed by a retrospective phase that explains why the finding works and situates it within existing theory. We present ResearchEVO, an end-to-end framework that computationally instantiates this discover-then-explain paradigm. The Evolution Phase employs LLM-guided bi-dimensional co-evolution -- simultaneously optimizing both algorithmic logic and overall architecture -- to search the space of code implementations purely by fitness, without requiring any understanding of the solutions it produces. The Writing Phase then takes the best-performing algorithm and autonomously generates a complete, publication-ready research paper through sentence-level retrieval-augmented generation with explicit anti-hallucination verification and automated experiment design. To our knowledge, ResearchEVO is the first system to cover this full pipeline end to end: no prior work jointly performs principled algorithm evolution and literature-grounded scientific documentation. We validate the framework on two cross-disciplinary scientific problems -- Quantum Error Correction using real Google quantum hardware data, and Physics-Informed Neural Networks -- where the Evolution Phase discovered human-interpretable algorithmic mechanisms that had not been previously proposed in the respective domain literatures. In both cases, the Writing Phase autonomously produced compilable LaTeX manuscripts that correctly grounded these blind discoveries in existing theory via RAG, with zero fabricated citations.

Related papers

• ECLAIR: A Causally-Grounded AI Framework for Scientific Discovery in Empirical Software Engineering [51.19819833971252]
  This paper introduces ECLAIR, a causally grounded AI framework that integrates Large Language Models into every stage of the scientific process.<n>ECLAIR treats LLMs as active scientific agents operating under the principles of causal inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-03T14:47:03Z)
• ReasFlow: Assisting Reasoning-Centric Scientific Discovery in Applied Mathematics via a Knowledge-Based Multi-Agent System [29.871573462927643]
  We introduce ReasFlow, an end-to-end autonomous agent system for reasoning-centric scientific discovery.<n>The system unifies literature synthesis, algorithm design, theorem proving, experimentation, and manuscript preparation in a single system.<n>ReasFlow is publicly accessible via the ReasLab platform, providing a collaborative workspace for AI-assisted theoretical research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-15T13:27:20Z)
• LECTOR: Joint Optimization of Scientific Reasoning Graphs and Introduction Generation [57.70907667652966]
  Introduction writing is especially challenging, which demands logical soundness and verifiable faithfulness.<n>Most AI-assisted methods treat the task as text generation instead of reasoning and structuring, leading to severe drawbacks.<n>We propose LECTOR, a novel Logic-Expression Co-Reinforcement Learning framework that can strictly follow the scientist's logic, add high-quality citations and keep structured expressions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-25T15:41:16Z)
• AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide [107.0834449839233]
  We present an end-to-end analysis of AI across the complete research lifecycle.<n>We identify a sharp, stage-dependent boundary between reliable assistance and unreliable autonomy.<n>We show that greater automation can obscure rather than eliminate failure modes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T17:08:26Z)
• Intern-Atlas: A Methodological Evolution Graph as Research Infrastructure for AI Scientists [35.81584849462589]
  Intern-Atlas is a methodological evolution graph that automatically identifies method-level entities.<n>Built from 1,030,314 papers spanning AI conferences, journals, and arXiv preprints, the resulting graph comprises 9,410,201 semantically typed edges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-30T17:44:55Z)
• Early Discoveries of Algorithmist I: Promise of Provable Algorithm Synthesis at Scale [9.349595533902479]
  Algorithmist is an autonomous researcher agent on top of GitHub Copilot.<n>We evaluate it on research-level tasks in private data analysis and clustering.<n>Results suggest a new paradigm in which LLM systems generate research-paper-quality algorithmic artifacts tailored to each dataset and deployment setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-23T04:06:55Z)
• Can we automatize scientific discovery in the cognitive sciences? [20.166894780789725]
  We propose a paradigm shift toward a fully automated, in silico science of the mind.<n>This framework implements every stage of the discovery cycle using Large Language Models (LLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-22T00:15:58Z)
• Towards a Science of Collective AI: LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems Need a Transition from Blind Trial-and-Error to Rigorous Science [70.3658845234978]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have greatly extended the capabilities of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS)<n>Despite this rapid progress, the field still relies heavily on empirical trial-and-error.<n>This bottleneck stems from the ambiguity of attribution.<n>We propose a factor attribution paradigm to systematically identify collaboration-driving factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T04:19:52Z)
• ATHENA: Agentic Team for Hierarchical Evolutionary Numerical Algorithms [4.235429894371577]
  ATHENA is an agentic framework designed as an Autonomous Lab to manage the end-to-end computational research lifecycle.<n>Its core is the HENA loop, a knowledge-driven diagnostic process framed as a Contextual problem.<n>The framework achieves super-human performance, reaching validation errors of $10-14$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T06:05:27Z)
• A Survey of AI Scientists [34.89083692070133]
  Artificial intelligence is undergoing a profound transition from a computational instrument to an autonomous originator of scientific knowledge.<n>This survey introduces a unified, six-stage methodological framework that deconstructs the end-to-end scientific process into: Literature Review, Idea Generation, Experimental Preparation, Experimental Execution, Scientific Writing, and Paper Generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T06:13:21Z)
• WebWeaver: Structuring Web-Scale Evidence with Dynamic Outlines for Open-Ended Deep Research [73.58638285105971]
  This paper tackles textbfopen-ended deep research (OEDR), a complex challenge where AI agents must synthesize vast web-scale information into insightful reports.<n>We introduce textbfWebWeaver, a novel dual-agent framework that emulates the human research process.<n>Our framework establishes a new state-of-the-art across major OEDR benchmarks, including DeepResearch Bench, DeepConsult, and DeepResearchGym.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-16T17:57:21Z)
• CodeScientist: End-to-End Semi-Automated Scientific Discovery with Code-based Experimentation [48.12054700748627]
  We introduce CodeScientist, a novel ASD system that frames ideation and experiment construction as a form of genetic search jointly.<n>We use this paradigm to conduct hundreds of automated experiments on machine-generated ideas broadly in the domain of agents and virtual environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T22:37:17Z)
• Automating Intervention Discovery from Scientific Literature: A Progressive Ontology Prompting and Dual-LLM Framework [56.858564736806414]
  This paper proposes a novel framework leveraging large language models (LLMs) to identify interventions in scientific literature.<n>Our approach successfully identified 2,421 interventions from a corpus of 64,177 research articles in the speech-language pathology domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T16:42:23Z)
• Large Language Models for Automated Open-domain Scientific Hypotheses Discovery [50.40483334131271]
  This work proposes the first dataset for social science academic hypotheses discovery. Unlike previous settings, the new dataset requires (1) using open-domain data (raw web corpus) as observations; and (2) proposing hypotheses even new to humanity. A multi- module framework is developed for the task, including three different feedback mechanisms to boost performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T05:19:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.