A Survey of AI Scientists

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23045v3
• Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 15:08:23 GMT
• Title: A Survey of AI Scientists
• Abstract summary: Artificial intelligence is undergoing a profound transition from a computational instrument to an autonomous originator of scientific knowledge.<n>This survey introduces a unified, six-stage methodological framework that deconstructs the end-to-end scientific process into: Literature Review, Idea Generation, Experimental Preparation, Experimental Execution, Scientific Writing, and Paper Generation.
• Score: 34.89083692070133
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence is undergoing a profound transition from a computational instrument to an autonomous originator of scientific knowledge. This emerging paradigm, the AI scientist, is architected to emulate the complete scientific workflow-from initial hypothesis generation to the final synthesis of publishable findings-thereby promising to fundamentally reshape the pace and scale of discovery. However, the rapid and unstructured proliferation of these systems has created a fragmented research landscape, obscuring overarching methodological principles and developmental trends. This survey provides a systematic and comprehensive synthesis of this domain by introducing a unified, six-stage methodological framework that deconstructs the end-to-end scientific process into: Literature Review, Idea Generation, Experimental Preparation, Experimental Execution, Scientific Writing, and Paper Generation. Through this analytical lens, we chart the field's evolution from early Foundational Modules (2022-2023) to integrated Closed-Loop Systems (2024), and finally to the current frontier of Scalability, Impact, and Human-AI Collaboration (2025-present). By rigorously synthesizing these developments, this survey not only clarifies the current state of autonomous science but also provides a critical roadmap for overcoming remaining challenges in robustness and governance, ultimately guiding the next generation of systems toward becoming trustworthy and indispensable partners in human scientific inquiry.

Related papers

• AI Scientists as Engines of Discovery: A Case for Development within Reformed Institutions [0.10102237605686408]
  Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are beginning to assist, accelerate, and partially automate scientific discovery.<n>We argue that suitably designed multi-agent systems may evolve from passive computational tools into AI scientists''<n>Such systems must be developed and deployed within a scientific ecosystem fit for purpose.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-22T05:06:29Z)
• OmniScientist: Toward a Co-evolving Ecosystem of Human and AI Scientists [47.41269933143946]
  We introduce OmniScientist, a framework that encodes the underlying mechanisms of human research into the AI scientific workflow.<n> OmniScientist achieves end-to-end automation across data foundation, literature review, research ideation, experiment automation, scientific writing, and peer review.<n>This infrastructure empowers agents to not only comprehend and leverage human knowledge systems but also to collaborate and co-evolve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T03:55:19Z)
• A Survey of Scientific Large Language Models: From Data Foundations to Agent Frontiers [251.23085679210206]
  Scientific Large Language Models (Sci-LLMs) are transforming how knowledge is represented, integrated, and applied in scientific research.<n>This survey reframes the development of Sci-LLMs as a co-evolution between models and their underlying data substrate.<n>We formulate a unified taxonomy of scientific data and a hierarchical model of scientific knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T18:30:52Z)
• Virtuous Machines: Towards Artificial General Science [0.0]
  We show that a domain-agnostic, agentic AI system can independently navigate the scientific workflow.<n>The system autonomously designed and executed three psychological studies on visual working memory, mental rotation, and imagery vividness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-19T00:35:56Z)
• From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery [108.1082357960201]
  Agentic AI shows capabilities in hypothesis generation, experimental design, execution, analysis, and iterative refinement.<n>This survey provides a domain-oriented review of autonomous scientific discovery across life sciences, chemistry, materials science, and physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T05:25:54Z)
• AI Scientists Fail Without Strong Implementation Capability [33.232300349142285]
  The emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Scientist represents a paradigm shift in scientific discovery.<n>Recent AI Scientist studies demonstrate sufficient capabilities for independent scientific discovery.<n>Despite this substantial progress, AI Scientist has yet to produce a groundbreaking achievement in the domain of computer science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T06:59:10Z)
• From Automation to Autonomy: A Survey on Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery [67.07598263346591]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are catalyzing a paradigm shift in scientific discovery.<n>This survey systematically charts this burgeoning field, placing a central focus on the changing roles and escalating capabilities of LLMs in science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T15:41:32Z)
• The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
  Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole. AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access. Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.