On the Decompositionality of Neural Networks
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.07868v1
- Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:32:24 GMT
- Title: On the Decompositionality of Neural Networks
- Abstract summary: We introduce neural decompositionality, a formal notion defined as a semantic-preserving abstraction over neural architectures.<n>Our key insight is that decompositionality should be characterized by the preservation of semantic behavior along the model's decision boundary.<n>We develop a boundary-aware framework, SAVED, which operationalizes the proposed definition.
- Score: 5.540814471808276
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent advances in deep neural networks have achieved state-of-the-art performance across vision and natural language processing tasks. In practice, however, most models are treated as monolithic black-box functions, limiting maintainability, component-wise optimization, and systematic testing and verification. Despite extensive work on pruning and empirical decomposition, the field still lacks a principled semantic notion of when a neural network can be meaningfully decomposed. We introduce neural decompositionality, a formal notion defined as a semantic-preserving abstraction over neural architectures. Our key insight is that decompositionality should be characterized by the preservation of semantic behavior along the model's decision boundary, which governs classification outcomes. This yields a semantic contract between the original model and its components, enabling a rigorous formulation of decomposition. Building on this foundation, we develop a boundary-aware framework, SAVED (Semantic-Aware Verification-Driven Decomposition), which operationalizes the proposed definition. SAVED combines counterexample mining over low logic-margin inputs, probabilistic coverage, and structure-aware pruning to construct decompositions that preserve decision-boundary semantics. We evaluate our approach on CNNs, language Transformers, and Vision Transformers. Results show clear architectural differences: language Transformers largely preserve boundary semantics under decomposition, whereas vision models frequently violate the decompositionality criterion, indicating intrinsic limits. Overall, our work establishes decompositionality as a formally definable and empirically testable property, providing a foundation for modular reasoning about neural networks.
Related papers
- SeFaR: Semantic Feature-aware Robustness Testing of Deep Neural Networks [0.6614755043607775]
SeFaR is a framework for semantic-feature-centric testing of vision models.<n>State-of-the-art diffusion and vision-language models are leveraged to generate semantic-preserving perturbations.<n>A feedback-driven adaptive process is adopted to generate interpretable failure-inducing semantic concepts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-10T22:50:17Z) - iFuzz-Meta: An Interpretable Fuzzy Learning Framework Bridging Top-Down and Bottom-Up Knowledge Integration [25.176188581821112]
iFuzz-Meta is an interpretable fuzzy rule-based learning framework.<n>It preserves human-understandable reasoning structures within modern neural architectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-30T02:44:54Z) - OMNIFLOW: A Physics-Grounded Multimodal Agent for Generalized Scientific Reasoning [51.33849811496781]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional logical reasoning capabilities but frequently struggle with the continuous dynamics by Partial Differential Equations (PDEs)<n>We propose OMNIFLOW, a multimodal-symbolic architecture designed to ground frozen LLMs in fundamental physical laws without requiring domain-specific parameter updates.<n>We evaluate it on a benchmark spanning microscopic turbulence, theoretical Navier-Stokes, and macroscopic global weather forecasting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-16T18:29:01Z) - Fluid Representations in Reasoning Models [91.77876704697779]
We present a mechanistic analysis of how QwQ-32B processes abstract structural information.<n>We find that QwQ-32B gradually improves its internal representation of actions and concepts during reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-04T18:34:50Z) - Beyond the Black Box: Identifiable Interpretation and Control in Generative Models via Causal Minimality [52.57416398859353]
We show that causal minimality can endow latent representations of diffusion vision and autoregressive language models with clear causal interpretation and robust, component-wise identifiable control.<n>We introduce a novel theoretical framework for hierarchical selection models, where higher-level concepts emerge from the constrained composition of lower-level variables.<n>These causally grounded concepts serve as levers for fine-grained model steering, paving the way for transparent, reliable systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-11T14:59:14Z) - A Percolation Model of Emergence: Analyzing Transformers Trained on a Formal Language [15.929767234646631]
Increase in data, size, or compute can lead to sudden learning of specific capabilities by a neural network.
"emergence" is a phenomenon often called "emergence"
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T17:44:22Z) - Semantic Loss Functions for Neuro-Symbolic Structured Prediction [74.18322585177832]
We discuss the semantic loss, which injects knowledge about such structure, defined symbolically, into training.
It is agnostic to the arrangement of the symbols, and depends only on the semantics expressed thereby.
It can be combined with both discriminative and generative neural models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-12T22:18:25Z) - Hierarchical Invariance for Robust and Interpretable Vision Tasks at Larger Scales [54.78115855552886]
We show how to construct over-complete invariants with a Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)-like hierarchical architecture.
With the over-completeness, discriminative features w.r.t. the task can be adaptively formed in a Neural Architecture Search (NAS)-like manner.
For robust and interpretable vision tasks at larger scales, hierarchical invariant representation can be considered as an effective alternative to traditional CNN and invariants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-23T16:50:07Z) - LOGICSEG: Parsing Visual Semantics with Neural Logic Learning and
Reasoning [73.98142349171552]
LOGICSEG is a holistic visual semantic that integrates neural inductive learning and logic reasoning with both rich data and symbolic knowledge.
During fuzzy logic-based continuous relaxation, logical formulae are grounded onto data and neural computational graphs, hence enabling logic-induced network training.
These designs together make LOGICSEG a general and compact neural-logic machine that is readily integrated into existing segmentation models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-24T05:43:19Z) - Multi-Relational Hyperbolic Word Embeddings from Natural Language
Definitions [5.763375492057694]
This paper presents a multi-relational model that explicitly leverages such a structure to derive word embeddings from definitions.
An empirical analysis demonstrates that the framework can help imposing the desired structural constraints.
Experiments reveal the superiority of the Hyperbolic word embeddings over the Euclidean counterparts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-12T08:16:06Z) - Learning Disentangled Representations for Natural Language Definitions [0.0]
We argue that recurrent syntactic and semantic regularities in textual data can be used to provide the models with both structural biases and generative factors.
We leverage the semantic structures present in a representative and semantically dense category of sentence types, definitional sentences, for training a Variational Autoencoder to learn disentangled representations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-22T14:31:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.