A Mathematical Framework for Temporal Modeling and Counterfactual Policy Simulation of Student Dropout
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08874v1
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 02:26:23 GMT
- Title: A Mathematical Framework for Temporal Modeling and Counterfactual Policy Simulation of Student Dropout
- Abstract summary: Dropout is operationalized as a time-to-event outcome at the enrollment level.<n>Weekly risk is modeled in discrete time via penalized, class-balanced logistic regression over person--period rows.<n>Under a late-event temporal holdout, the model attains row-level AUCs of 0.8350 (train) and 0.8405 (test)
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This study proposes a temporal modeling framework with a counterfactual policy-simulation layer for student dropout in higher education, using LMS engagement data and administrative withdrawal records. Dropout is operationalized as a time-to-event outcome at the enrollment level; weekly risk is modeled in discrete time via penalized, class-balanced logistic regression over person--period rows. Under a late-event temporal holdout, the model attains row-level AUCs of 0.8350 (train) and 0.8405 (test), with aggregate calibration acceptable but sparsely supported in the highest-risk bins. Ablation analyses indicate performance is sensitive to feature set composition, underscoring the role of temporal engagement signals. A scenario-indexed policy layer produces survival contrasts $ΔS(T)$ under an explicit trigger/schedule contract: positive contrasts are confined to the shock branch ($T_{\rm policy}=18$: 0.0102, 0.0260, 0.0819), while the mechanism-aware branch is negative ($ΔS_{\rm mech}(18)=-0.0078$, $ΔS_{\rm mech}(38)=-0.0134$). A subgroup analysis by gender quantifies scenario-induced survival gaps via bootstrap; contrasts are directionally stable but small. Results are not causally identified; they demonstrate the framework's capacity for internal structural scenario comparison under observational data constraints.
Related papers
- $\ exttt{findr}$: Transparent and Fair Credit Risk Decisions through Semi-Structured Regressions [5.58905274289646]
$texttfindr$ is a semi-structured framework for binary credit risk modelling.<n>It decomposes the logit into an interpretable structured component and a neural residual.<n>It measures the structured component's contribution to logit variation, decision agreement, and local directional consistency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-25T14:08:07Z) - SANE: State Anomaly Neutralization for Stable Extreme-Context Delta-Rule Models [53.86918766240095]
Delta-Rule recurrent models maintain a fixed-size state, enabling $O(1)$ inference memory but potentially becoming unstable under extreme-context extrapolation.<n>We propose textbfState Anomaly Neutralization (SANE), which applies adaptive $tanh$ compression at chunk boundaries while preserving the intra-chunk parallel structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-23T10:41:07Z) - Perspective Latents as an Architectural Condition for Causal Emergence in Active Inference Agents [0.0]
I test how reward-free predictive organization relates to information-theoretic signatures in an active inference agent.<n>Results identify $g$ as the architectural locus of $_r$-relevant temporal organization in an active inference agent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-22T20:25:29Z) - Temporal Dropout Risk in Learning Analytics: A Harmonized Survival Benchmark Across Dynamic and Early-Window Representations [0.0]
Student dropout is a persistent concern in Learning Analytics.<n>This study introduces a survival-oriented benchmark for temporal dropout risk modelling.<n>Results support the value of a harmonized, multi-dimensional benchmark in Learning Analytics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-10T02:10:12Z) - Tight Convergence Rates for Online Distributed Linear Estimation with Adversarial Measurements [66.94250413799232]
We study mean estimation of a random vector $X$ in a distributed parameter-server-worker setup.<n>Key challenges are adversarial measurements and asynchrony.<n>Results provide a unified finite-time characterization of robustness, identifiability, and statistical efficiency in distributed linear estimation with adversarial workers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-04-07T11:45:55Z) - $V_{0.5}$: Generalist Value Model as a Prior for Sparse RL Rollouts [81.48669089692189]
Generalist Value Models (such as $V_0.5$) achieve pre-trained value estimation by explicitly encoding model capabilities in-context.<n>We propose $V_0.5$, which adaptively fuses the baseline predicted by such value model with the empirical mean derived from sparse rollouts.<n>$V_0.5$ significantly outperforms GRPO and DAPO, achieving faster convergence and over some 10% performance improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-11T14:57:41Z) - ARTIS: Agentic Risk-Aware Test-Time Scaling via Iterative Simulation [72.78362530982109]
ARTIS, Agentic Risk-Aware Test-Time Scaling via Iterative Simulation, is a framework that decouples exploration from commitment.<n>We show that naive LLM-based simulators struggle to capture rare but high-impact failure modes.<n>We introduce a risk-aware tool simulator that emphasizes fidelity on failure-inducing actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-02T06:33:22Z) - PS$^2$: Parameterized Control for Fine-Grained Student Proficiency Simulation [37.112666030892115]
Student Simulation (PS$2$) is an unsupervised and parameterized model-level framework that simulates students with different proficiencies.<n>PS$2$ achieves finer-grained and consistent proficiency simulation compared to existing baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-31T18:27:56Z) - Drift No More? Context Equilibria in Multi-Turn LLM Interactions [58.69551510148673]
contexts drift is the gradual divergence of a model's outputs from goal-consistent behavior across turns.<n>Unlike single-turn errors, drift unfolds temporally and is poorly captured by static evaluation metrics.<n>We show that multi-turn drift can be understood as a controllable equilibrium phenomenon rather than as inevitable decay.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T04:48:49Z) - Log-Sum-Exponential Estimator for Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning [50.93804891554481]
We introduce a novel estimator based on the log-sum-exponential (LSE) operator, which outperforms traditional inverse propensity score estimators.<n>Our LSE estimator demonstrates variance reduction and robustness under heavy-tailed conditions.<n>In the off-policy learning scenario, we establish bounds on the regret -- the performance gap between our LSE estimator and the optimal policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-07T17:37:10Z) - Adversarial learning for nonparametric regression: Minimax rate and adaptive estimation [3.244945627960733]
We establish the minimax rate of convergence under adversarial $L_risks with $1 leq leq infty$ and propose a piecewise local estimator that achieves the minimax optimality.<n>We construct a data-driven adaptive estimator that is shown to achieve, within a logarithmic factor, the optimal rate across a broad scale of non and adversarial classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-02T02:38:47Z) - Test-Time Regret Minimization in Meta Reinforcement Learning [28.710895687701353]
We consider a finite set of tasks modeled through Markov decision processes with various dynamics.
We focus on regret minimization against the optimal policy in the unknown test task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T12:56:10Z) - Minimax-Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation with Linear Function Approximation [49.502277468627035]
This paper studies the statistical theory of batch data reinforcement learning with function approximation.
Consider the off-policy evaluation problem, which is to estimate the cumulative value of a new target policy from logged history.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-21T19:20:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.