TaxPraBen: A Scalable Benchmark for Structured Evaluation of LLMs in Chinese Real-World Tax Practice
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.08948v1
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2026 04:36:21 GMT
- Title: TaxPraBen: A Scalable Benchmark for Structured Evaluation of LLMs in Chinese Real-World Tax Practice
- Abstract summary: We introduce TaxPraBen, the first dedicated benchmark for Chinese taxation practice.<n>It combines 10 traditional application tasks, along with 3 pioneering real-world scenarios: tax risk prevention, tax inspection analysis, and tax strategy planning.<n>TaxPraBen features a scalable structured evaluation paradigm designed through process of "structured parsing-field alignment-numerical extraction"
- Score: 18.250570045713882
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various general domains, they exhibit notable gaps in the highly specialized, knowledge-intensive, and legally regulated Chinese tax domain. Consequently, while tax-related benchmarks are gaining attention, many focus on isolated NLP tasks, neglecting real-world practical capabilities. To address this issue, we introduce TaxPraBen, the first dedicated benchmark for Chinese taxation practice. It combines 10 traditional application tasks, along with 3 pioneering real-world scenarios: tax risk prevention, tax inspection analysis, and tax strategy planning, sourced from 14 datasets totaling 7.3K instances. TaxPraBen features a scalable structured evaluation paradigm designed through process of "structured parsing-field alignment extraction-numerical and textual matching", enabling end-to-end tax practice assessment while being extensible to other domains. We evaluate 19 LLMs based on Bloom's taxonomy. The results indicate significant performance disparities: all closed-source large-parameter LLMs excel, and Chinese LLMs like Qwen2.5 generally exceed multilingual LLMs, while the YaYi2 LLM, fine-tuned with some tax data, shows only limited improvement. TaxPraBen serves as a vital resource for advancing evaluations of LLMs in practical applications.
Related papers
- PLawBench: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Real-World Legal Practice [67.71760070255425]
We introduce PLawBench, a practical benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in legal practice scenarios.<n>PLawBench comprises 850 questions across 13 practical legal scenarios, with each question accompanied by expert-designed evaluation rubrics.<n>Using an LLM-based evaluator aligned with human expert judgments, we evaluate 10 state-of-the-art LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-23T11:36:10Z) - Taxon: Hierarchical Tax Code Prediction with Semantically Aligned LLM Expert Guidance [17.32251921642481]
Taxon is a semantically aligned and expert-guided framework for hierarchical tax code prediction.<n>Taxon has been deployed in production within Alibaba's tax service system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-13T10:41:23Z) - Using Large Language Models for Legal Decision-Making in Austrian Value-Added Tax Law: An Experimental Study [0.0]
This paper provides an experimental evaluation of the capability of large language models (LLMs) to assist in legal decision-making within the framework of Austrian and European Union value-added tax (VAT) law.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-11T10:19:56Z) - Verifying the Verifiers: Unveiling Pitfalls and Potentials in Fact Verifiers [59.168391398830515]
We evaluate 12 pre-trained LLMs and one specialized fact-verifier, using a collection of examples from 14 fact-checking benchmarks.<n>We highlight the importance of addressing annotation errors and ambiguity in datasets.<n> frontier LLMs with few-shot in-context examples, often overlooked in previous works, achieve top-tier performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T10:32:10Z) - FinTagging: Benchmarking LLMs for Extracting and Structuring Financial Information [47.37027539828975]
FinTagging is the first comprehensive benchmark for structure-aware and full-scope.<n>tagging.<n> FinNI for numeric identification extracts numerical entities and their types from.<n>financial reports.<n>FinCL for concept linking maps each extracted entity to the corresponding concept in the full U.S. taxonomy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T02:55:53Z) - Taxation Perspectives from Large Language Models: A Case Study on Additional Tax Penalties [5.185522256407782]
We introduce PLAT, a new benchmark designed to assess the ability of LLMs to predict the legitimacy of additional tax penalties.<n>Our experiments with six LLMs reveal that their baseline capabilities are limited, especially when dealing with conflicting issues that demand a comprehensive understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-05T12:24:20Z) - Can Large Language Models Predict the Outcome of Judicial Decisions? [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exceptional capabilities in Natural Language Processing (NLP)<n>We benchmark state-of-the-art open-source LLMs, including LLaMA-3.2-3B and LLaMA-3.1-8B, under varying configurations.<n>Our results demonstrate that fine-tuned smaller models achieve comparable performance to larger models in task-specific contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-15T11:32:35Z) - RuleArena: A Benchmark for Rule-Guided Reasoning with LLMs in Real-World Scenarios [58.90106984375913]
RuleArena is a novel and challenging benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of large language models (LLMs) to follow complex, real-world rules in reasoning.<n> Covering three practical domains -- airline baggage fees, NBA transactions, and tax regulations -- RuleArena assesses LLMs' proficiency in handling intricate natural language instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T06:08:46Z) - CFinBench: A Comprehensive Chinese Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models [61.324062412648075]
CFinBench is an evaluation benchmark for assessing the financial knowledge of large language models (LLMs) under Chinese context.
It comprises 99,100 questions spanning 43 second-level categories with 3 question types: single-choice, multiple-choice and judgment.
The results show that GPT4 and some Chinese-oriented models lead the benchmark, with the highest average accuracy being 60.16%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T14:34:36Z) - CIF-Bench: A Chinese Instruction-Following Benchmark for Evaluating the Generalizability of Large Language Models [53.9835961434552]
We introduce the Chinese Instruction-Following Benchmark (CIF-Bench) to evaluate the generalizability of large language models (LLMs) to the Chinese language.
CIF-Bench comprises 150 tasks and 15,000 input-output pairs, developed by native speakers to test complex reasoning and Chinese cultural nuances.
To mitigate data contamination, we release only half of the dataset publicly, with the remainder kept private, and introduce diversified instructions to minimize score variance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T16:02:12Z) - AlignBench: Benchmarking Chinese Alignment of Large Language Models [99.24597941555277]
We introduce AlignBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating Chinese Large Language Models' alignment.
We design a human-in-the-loop data curation pipeline, containing eight main categories, 683 real-scenario rooted queries and corresponding human verified references.
For automatic evaluation, our benchmark employs a rule-calibrated multi-dimensional LLM-as-Judgecitezheng2023judging approach with Chain-of-Thought to generate explanations and final ratings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-30T17:41:30Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.